Global Justice

  • Abhishek Choudhary
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3572-1

Synonyms

Definition

Global justice is a theoretical stand that addresses the issue of just distribution of benefits and burdens across the world and looks at the viability of the institutions required to secure such a just distribution.

Introduction

Global justice is a theoretical stand that addresses the issue of “just distribution of benefits and burdens across the world” and also looks at the viability of the institutions required to “secure such a just distribution” (Kukathas 2006: 1). The basis of cosmopolitan global justice lies in the consideration of individual human beings as the primary object of concern wherein the territorial boundaries does not imply any constraint on the deliverance of justice. The idea of global justice is rooted in the theory of cosmopolitanism, which is defined as a moral ideal that emphasizes tolerance towards differences and envisages the possibility of a more...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aurelius M (2006) Meditations. (trans: Hammond M). Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayoob M (2002) Humanitarian intervention and state sovereignty. Int J Hum Rights 6(1):81–102.  https://doi.org/10.1080/714003751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beitz CR (1979) Political theory and international relations. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  4. Brock G (2009) Global justice: a cosmopolitan account. Oxford University Press, Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230938.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cabrera L (2004) Political theory of global justice: a cosmopolitan case for the World State. Routledge, Oxfordshire.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caney S (2003) Cosmopolitan justice and equalizing opportunities. In: Pogge TW (ed) Global justice. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Choudhary A (2016) Cosmopolitanism as biopower: creating and targeting cultural others. IAFOR J Polit Econ Law 3(1):13–23.  https://doi.org/10.22492/ijpel.3.1.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choudhary A (2018) Justice, morality, and international relations: a critical–theoretical reading. Jadavpur J Int Rel 22(1):22–38.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0973598418757818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cicero MT (1887) Ethical writing of Cicero: De Officiis; De Senectute; De Amicitia, and Scipio’s dream (trans: Peabody AP). Little, Brown and Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hurrell A (1990) Kant and the Kantian paradigm in international relations. Rev Int Stud 16(3):183–205.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050011246XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jelnikar A (2011) Rabindranath Tagore. In: Chatterjee DK (ed) Encyclopedia of global justice. Springer, Utah.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kant I (2002) Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals (trans: Wood AW). Yale University Press, New Haven/LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Kant I (2006) Toward perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace, and history (trans: Colclasure DL). Yale University Press, New Haven/London.Google Scholar
  14. Kukathas C (2006) The mirage of global justice. In: Paul EF, Miller FD Jr, Paul J (eds) Justice and global politics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Mouffe C (2005) On the political. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Nussbaum MC (2002.) Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism) In: Nussbaum MC, Cohen J (eds) For love of country? Debating the limits of patriotism. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Oruka HO (1989) The philosophy of foreign aid: a question of the right to a human minimum. Prax Int 8(4):465–475Google Scholar
  18. Oruka HO (1997) Practical philosophy: in search of an ethical minimum. East African Educational Publishers, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  19. Pande BN (1993) The Vedant and Sufism: a comparative study. In: Hameed SS (ed) Contemporary relevance of Sufism. Indian Council for Cultural Relations, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  20. Peetush A (2011) Ahimsa. In: Chatterjee DK (ed) Encyclopedia of global justice. Springer, Utah.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pogge TW (1992) Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethics 103(1):48–75.  https://doi.org/10.1086/293470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pogge TW (2001) Introduction: global justice. In: Pogge TW (ed) Global justice, vol 32. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, p 1Google Scholar
  23. Pogge TW (2008) World poverty and human rights. Polity, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Pogge TW (2010) Politics as usual: what lies behind the pro-poor rhetoric. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Rawls J (1971) A theory of justice. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Rawls J (1993) The law of peoples. Crit Enq 20:36–68.  https://doi.org/10.1086/448700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sen A (1985) The standard of living. The Tanner lectures on human values, delivered at Clare Hall on March 11 and 12. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Sen A (1995) Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sen A (2002) Justice across Borders. In: De Greiff P, Cronin C (eds) Global justice and transnational politics: essays on the moral and political challenges of globalization. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Seok B (2011) Justice and religion: Confucianism. In: Chatterjee DK (ed) Encyclopedia of global justice. Springer, Utah.  https://doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2011.39.4.303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sherman N (2005) Stoic warriors: the ancient philosophy behind the military mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195315912.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Snow NE (2011) Mahatma Gandhi. In: Chatterjee DK (ed) Encyclopedia of global justice. Springer, Utah.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walzer M (1994) Thick and thin moral argument at home and abroad. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  34. Weber M (1968) Economy and society: an outline of interpretative sociology, vol I (trans: Roth G, Wittich C). University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilson EK (2010) Beyond dualism: expanded understandings of religion and global justice. Int Stud Q 54(3):733–754.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00607.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for International Politics, Organisation and Disarmament, School of International StudiesJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia