Administrative Discretion in Participatory Processes

  • Roberto Falanga
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3547-1

Synonyms

Definition

Administrative discretion in participatory processes refers to the degrees of power exerted by public officials at the margins of formal roles. As participatory processes in policymaking require public officials to intermediate between political representatives and social agents, administrative discretion is a key feature for the (re)configuration of public officials’ roles in public administration.

Introduction

Weber’s theoretical model of bureaucracy provided an ideal type of organization for the management of democratic governance in the nineteenth century. The author identifies formal rules and procedures and argues the adoption of impersonal behavior by public officials in order to ensure a clear-cut separation between personal and organizational interests. The autonomy of bureaucracies...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Fung A (2015) Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Adm Rev 75(4):513–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gaventa J, Barret G (2010) So what differences does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. Working Paper, IDS, vol 347, pp 1–72Google Scholar
  3. Gouldner AW (1959) Organizational analysis. In: Merton RK, Broom L, Cottrell LS (eds) Sociology today: problems and prospects. Harper Torchbook, New York, pp 400–428Google Scholar
  4. Hoppe R (2011) Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy Polit 39(2):163–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lipsky M (1980) Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russel Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Merton RK (1938) Social structure and anomie. Am Sociol Rev 3:672–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Osborne D, Gaebler T (1992) Reinventing government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  8. Page EC (2007) Middle level bureaucrats: policy, discretion and control. In: Raadschelders JCN, Toonen TAJ, Van der Meer FM (eds) The civil service in the 21st century. Comparative perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Rhodes RAW (1996) The new governance: governing without governance. Polit Stud 44(4):652–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosenbaum WA (1976) The paradoxes of public participation. Adm Soc 8(3):355–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Selznick P (1957) Leadership in administration. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Theodoulou SZ, Kofinis C (2004) The art of the game: understanding policy making. Thomson Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas JC (1995) Public participation in public decisions. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. Thompson J (1995) Participatory approaches in government bureaucracies: facilitating the process of institutional change. World Dev 15(4):1521–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vigoda E (2002) From responsiveness to collaboration: governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Adm Rev 62(5):527–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology, Instituto de Ciências SociaisUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal