Comparative Conservation Studies: A “Bottom-Up” Collaborative Governance

  • Emmanuel Yeboah-AssiamahEmail author
  • Kobus Muller
  • Kwame Ameyaw Domfeh
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3394-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Collaborative Governance entails the new governance system that emphasizes on different stakeholders to prudently and methodically govern natural resources (Yeboah-Assiamah et al. 2016). In this entry, it connotes the creation of synergies between formal and informal governance structures as well as formal and informal institutions.

Conservation is the appropriate management of a natural resource to avert its exploitation, annihilation, or degradation.

Bottom up connotes strategies or activities that are initiated, propelled, and championed by either an individual, group of individuals, and groups within a local community before gaining subsequent formal or external recognition and support. It could also be an initiative of the entire local community through its legitimate leaders.

Introduction

The complexity and high stakes associated with natural resources render them rather problematic...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Atkinson P, Hammersley M (1994) Ethnography and participant observation. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 248–260Google Scholar
  2. Borrini-Feyerabend G, Pimbert M, Farvar T, Kothari A, Renard Y (2004) Sharing power. Learning by doing in co-management of natural resources throughout the world. Iied and iucn/ceesp/cmwg, Cenesta, TeheránGoogle Scholar
  3. Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson JG (ed) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, New York, pp 241–258Google Scholar
  4. Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (2011) The sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, –Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  6. Eshun G, Tonto JNP (2014) Community-based ecotourism: its socio-economic impacts at Boabeng-fiema monkey sanctuary, Ghana. Bulletin of Geography Socio-economic Series 26(26):67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Estrada A, Garber PA, Rylands AB, Roos C, Fernandez-Duque E, Di Fiore A et al (2017) Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: why primates matter. Sci Adv 3(1):1–16Google Scholar
  8. Gray B (1989) Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. Hayes TM (2006) Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Dev 34(12):2064–2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kowalski AA, Jenkins LD (2015) The role of bridging organizations in environmental management: examining social networks in working groups. Ecol Soc 20(2):16–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Olson M (1982) The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation and social rigidities. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  12. Olsson P, Folke C, Galaz V, Hahn T, Schultz L (2007) Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vatternrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden. Ecol Soc 12(1):28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Olsson P, Gunderson L, Carpenter S, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11(1)Google Scholar
  14. Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2009) The meaning of social capital and its link to collective action. In: Svendsen GT (ed) Handbook of social capital: the troika of sociology, political science and economics. Edwards Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  15. Putnam RD (1993) The prosperous community: social capital and public life. Am Prospect 4Google Scholar
  16. Reeves S, Kuper A, Hodges BD (2008) Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ 337:512–514Google Scholar
  17. Sayles JS, Baggio JA (2017) Who collaborates and why: assessment and diagnostic of governance network integration for salmon restoration in Puget Sound, USA. J Environ Manag 186:64–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson S (2008) Research is ceremony: indigenous research methods. Fernwood, WinnipegGoogle Scholar
  19. Yamaki K (2016) Role of social networks in urban forest management collaboration: a case study in northern Japan. Urban For Urban Green 18:212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yeboah-Assiamah E, Muller K, Domfeh KA (2016) Rising to the challenge: a framework for optimising value in collaborative natural resource governance. Forest Policy Econ 67:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yeboah-Assiamah E, Muller K, Domfeh KA (2017) ‘Complex crisis’ and the rise of collaborative natural resource governance: institutional trajectory of a wildlife governance experience in Ghana. Environ Dev Sustain:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9985-x

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kobus Muller
    • 1
  • Kwame Ameyaw Domfeh
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Public LeadershipStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Public Administration and Health Services ManagementUniversity of Ghana Business SchoolAccraGhana