Policy Diffusion in Latin America

Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2712-2

Introduction

Studies about public policy diffusion address questions about political change. Among these we can find: Why different governments adopt the same type of policy? Why others do not do it? Why some innovations in policy are scattered and concentrated in a given territory? What explains the speed of a policy diffusion process? (Coêlho 2016). To answer these questions, it is assumed that the information about new policies or institutions is communicated by the members of a social system in an uncoordinated way, and where the first adoptions of an innovation affects the chances of doing so by those who have not applied it (Rogers 2004).

From the 1960s onwards, the contributions of innovation diffusion studies – such as those of Rogers (2004) – began to be applied to the field of public policy. The objective is to explain policy-making processes where several different actors formulate and design similar policies, assuming that this process is not explained exclusively by...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bender K, Keller S, Willing H (2014) The role of international policy transfer and diffusion for policy change in social protection – a review of the state of the art. IZNE Social Protection Working Paper 14/1, International Policy Learning and Policy Change: Scientific Inputs for the Dialogue on Social Protection with Global PartnersGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry FS, Berry W (2007) Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview, Boulder, pp 223–260Google Scholar
  3. Brooks S (2009) Social protection and the market in Latin America: the transformation of social security institutions. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Brooks S (2015) Social protection for the poorest: the adoption of antipoverty Cash Transfer programs in the Global South. Polit Soc 43(4):551–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coêlho DB (2016) Mecanismos de difusão de Políticas Sociais no Brasil: uma análise do Programa Saúde da Família. Revista de Sociologia e Política 24(58). (En impresión)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Faria C (2003) Idéias, conhecimento e políticas públicas. Um inventário sucinto das principais vertentes analíticas recentes. in Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 18(51):21–29Google Scholar
  7. De Faria C (2012) A difusão de políticas sociais como estratégia de inserção internacional: Brasil e Venezuela comparado. Interseções 14(2):335–371Google Scholar
  8. Elkins Z, Simmons B (2005) On waves, clusters, and diffusion: a conceptual framework. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 598:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilardi F (2012) Transnational diffusion: norms, ideas, and policies. In: Carlsnaes W, Risse T, Simmons B (eds) Handbook of international relations. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 453–477Google Scholar
  10. Jordana J, Levi-Faur D (2005) The diffusion of regulatory capitalism in Latin America: sectorial and national channels in the making of a new order. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 598(1):102–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jordana J, Levi-Faur D, Fernández i Marín X (2009) The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: channels of transfer and stages of diffusion. IBEI Working Papers 2009/28Google Scholar
  12. Jordana J, Levi-Faur D, Fernández i Marín X (2011) The global diffusion of regulatory agencies: channels of transfer and stages of diffusion. Comp Pol Stud 44(10):1343–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Levi-Faur D (2005) The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 598(1):12–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meseguer C (2004) What role for learning? The diffusion of privatization in the OECD and Latin American. J Publ Policy 24(3):299–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Meseguer C (2005) Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 598:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meseguer C, Gilardi F (2008) Reflexiones sobre el debate de la difusión de políticas. en Política y Gobierno Vol. XV(2):315–351Google Scholar
  17. Meseguer C, Gilardi F (2009) What is new in the study of policy diffusion? Rev Int Polit Econ 16(3):527–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Osorio C (2014) La difusión de los Programas de Transferencia Condicionada en América Latina 1990–2010, Doctorado en Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. Departamento de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  19. Osorio C (2015) ¿Cómo se difunden y adoptan los Programas de Transferencia Condicionada en América Latina? Propuesta de operacionalización de los mecanismos de difusión aplicado al caso chileno. In FLACSO – Ecuador (ed) Revista Íconos. Número 53. pp 31–48. ISSN: 1390-1249Google Scholar
  20. Porto de Oliveira O (2016) International policy diffusion and participatory budgeting: Ambassadors of participation, international institutions and transnational networks. Palgrave McMillanGoogle Scholar
  21. Rogers EM (2004) A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. J Health Commun 9(6):13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Simmons B, Zachary E (2005) On waves, clusters and diffusion: a conceptual framework. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 598(1):33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Simmons B, Dobbins F, Garrett G (eds) (2008) The global diffusion of markets and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Strang D (1991) Adding social structure to diffusion models: An event history framework. en Sociological Methods and Research 19(3):324–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sugiyama NB (2013) Diffusion of good government. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre DameGoogle Scholar
  26. Walker JL (1969) The diffusion of innovations among the American states. Am Polit Sci Rev 63(3):880–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weyland K (2002) The politics of market reform in fragile democracies. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Weyland K (ed) (2004) Learning from foreign models in Latin American policy reform. Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington, DC/BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  29. Weyland K (2005) The diffusion of innovations. How cognitive heuristics shaped Bolivia’s pension reform. Comp Polit 38(1):21–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weyland K (2006) Bounded rationality and policy diffusion: social sector reform in Latin America. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  31. Weyland K (2014) Making waves. Democratic contention in Europe and Latin America since the revolutions of 1848. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Alberto HurtadoSantiagoChile