Comparative Public Management Systems

  • Adeyemi O. Adebayo
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1207-1

Synonyms

Definition

Comparative public management is an aspect of public administration that considers governmental activities in different socioeconomic, political, and cultural settings.

For the purposes of this study, systems connote a set of procedures or principles by which something is done. Thus, taken together, comparative public management systems entail methodology, methods, theoretical perspectives, and\or techniques by which comparative analysis in public management is and can be conducted.

Introduction

Comparative public management is an aspect of public administration that considers governmental activities in different socioeconomic, political, and cultural settings. Thus, this comparative public management is an approach to methodology in the field of public management. In this way, comparative public management...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acerete JB, Shaoul J, Stafford A, Stapleton P (2010) The cost of using private finance for roads in Spain and the UK. Aus J Publ Adm 69:S48–S60.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00654.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alford J, O’Flynn J (2012) Rethinking public service delivery: managing with external providers. Palgrave Macmilian, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashworth R, Ferlie E, Hammerschmid G, Moon MJ, Reay T (2013) Theorizing contemporary public management: international and comparative perspectives. Br J Manag 24(S3):S1–S17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avellaneda CN (2017) The delegation of municipal spending in Honduras: does the decision context matter? In: Meier KJ, Rutherford A, Avellaneda CN (eds) Comparative public management. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp 154–174Google Scholar
  5. Carpintero S, Siemiatycki M (2015) PPP projects in local infrastructure: evidence from schools in the Madrid region, Spain. Publ Money Manag 35(6):439–446.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1083690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gopalkrishna N, Karnam G (2015) Performance analysis of National Highways Public Private Partnerships in India. Public Work Manag Policy 20(3):264–285.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X14558270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grimsey D, Lewis M (2004) Public private partnerships. The worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Eldward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  8. Higgins CD, Huque AS (2015) Public money and Mickey mouse: evaluating performance and accountability in the Hong Kong Disneyland joint venture public–private partnership. Public Manag Rev 17(8):1103–1123.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.881533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hodge G, Greve C (2010) Public-private partnerships: governance scheme or language game? Aust J Public Adm 69:S8–S22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00659.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnston J (2010) Examining “Tunnel Vision” in Australian PPPs: rationales, rhetoric, risks and rogues. Aust J Public Adm 69:S61–S73.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00660.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klijn E, Teisman GR (2002) Institutional and strategic barriers to public-private partnership: an analysis of Dutch cases. Networks 23:9–11.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00361Google Scholar
  12. Knox C (2017) Comparative policy reforms. In: Global Encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance, pp 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5
  13. O’Toole J, Meier KJ (2017) Comparative public management: a framework for analysis. In: Comparative public management. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Peters GB (1994) Theory and methodology in the study of comparative public administration. In: Baker R (ed) Comparative public management: putting U.S. public policy and implementation in context. Praeger Publishers, Westport, pp 67–91Google Scholar
  15. Pollit C, Bouckaert G (2011) Public management reform: a comparative analysis, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Reeves E, Ryan J (2007) Piloting public-private partnerships: expensive lessons from Ireland’s schools’ sector. Public Money Manag 27(5):331–338.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00604.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rutherford A, O’Toole LJ, Meier KJ (2017) The future role of context: the international research agenda. In: Meier KJ, Rutherford A, Avellanda CN (eds) Comparative public management. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp 195–211Google Scholar
  18. Siemiatycki M, Friedman J (2012) The trade-offs of transferring demand risk on urban transit public-private partnerships. Public Work Manag Policy 17(3):283–302.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724x12436993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Van Gestel K, Willems T, Verhoest K, Voets J, Van Garsse S (2014) Public–private partnerships in Flemish schools: a complex governance structure in a complex context. Public Money Manag 34(5):363–370.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2014.945808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Vecchi V, Hellowell M, Longo F (2010) Are Italian healthcare organizations paying too much for their public–private partnerships? Public Money Manag 30(2):125–132.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540961003665586CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adeyemi O. Adebayo
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South AfricaPretoriaSouth Africa