Advertisement

Ontological Expansion

  • Ilkka Tuomi
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Much of science and philosophy is based on the assumption that a reality exists that is independent of who observes it (realism) or that this reality is primarily a construction of the mind (idealism). In both cases, the reality is often assumed to be static, and large bodies of philosophical literature exist that study what can we know about this reality. This chapter proposes a different approach, arguing that reality is continuously expanding. Innovation and evolution create things that did not exist before. We have data or facts only about things that already exist, and the traditional epistemic theories of realism and idealism therefore have little to say about the nature of innovation, qualitative novelty, and creative evolution.

In many practical areas of concern, such as strategy and policy development, design, and innovation management and impact assessment, emerging futures play a central role. This chapter studies how realities expand and become real. It characterizes three main principles—functional shift, constant creation, and relational ontology—that underpin ontological expansion. It then discusses the dynamics of this expansion in the context of learning, narrative chronotopes, innovation theory, and the cognitive theory of “dominants” proposed by A.A. Ukhtomsky in the first decades of the 20th century. The chapter then suggests ways in which the key processes of ontological expansion can be formally modeled, using concepts from category theory.

Keywords

Innovation Evolution Anticipatory systems Chronotope Unpredictability Relational ontology Functional shift Constant creation Bergsonism Cultural-historical activity theory Memory Evolutive systems futures literacy Futures studies Business strategy Policy development Category theory Emergence 

References

  1. Antliff, M. (1993). Inventing Bergson: Cultural politics and the Parisian avant-garde. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Awodey, S. (2010). Category theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. (1981). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel: Notes toward a historical poetics. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (pp. 84–258). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, A.G. (1876). Improvement in telegraphy. In Coe, L. (1995). The telephone and its many inventors. Jefferson, N.C.: McFarland, Appendix 10.Google Scholar
  5. Bergson, H. (1983). Creative evolution (first edition 1907). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  6. Bergson, H. (1988). Matter and memory (first edition 1896). New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buber, M. (2000). I and Thou. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chebanov, S. V. (2015). Ukhtomsky’s idea of chronotope as frame of anticipation. In M. Nadin (Ed.), Anticipation: Learning from the past – the Russian/Soviet contributions to the science of anticipation (pp. 137–150). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Constant, E. W. (1984). Communities and hierarchies: Structure in the practice of science and technology. In R. Laudan (Ed.), The nature of technological knowledge: Are models of scientific change relevant? (pp. 27–46). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehresmann, A. C., & Vanbremeersch, J.-P. (2007). Memory evolutive systems. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Ehresmann, A., Tuomi, I., Miller, R., Béjean, M., & Vanbremeersch, P. (forthcoming). Towards a formal framework for describing collective intelligence knowledge creation processes that “Use-the-future.” In Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century (p. Ch. 3). Paris: Routledge/UNESCO.Google Scholar
  13. Engels, F. (1907). “Anti-Duehring” (Original title: Herrn Eugen Dührings Umwältzung der Wissenschaft, 1878). Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Company. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/31933.Google Scholar
  14. Engels, F. (1966). Dialectics of nature. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental work research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit.Google Scholar
  16. Fischer, C. S. (1992). America calling: A social history of telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, C., & Louçã, F. (2001). As time goes by: From the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gunter, P. A. Y. (1983). Introduction to the UPA edition: Philosophical method and biological time. In H. Bergson (Ed.), Creative evolution (pp. xvii–xvli). Lanham: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  20. Kingslover, J. G., & Koehl, M. A. R. (1985). Aerodynamics, thermoregulation, and the evolution of insect wings: Differential scaling and evolutionary change. Evolution, 39(3), 488–504.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2408648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kohonen, T. (1998). The self-organizing map. Neurocomputing, 21(1), 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(98)00030-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  26. Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lie, M., & Sørensen, K. H. (1996). Making technology our own? Domesticating technology into everyday life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Louie, A. H. (2009). More than life itself: A synthetic continuation in relational biology. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Louie, A. H. (2010). Robert Rosen’s anticipatory systems. Foresight, 12(3), 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luria, A. R., & Vygotsky, L. (1992). Ape, primitive man, and child: Essays in the history of behavior. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, R. (2007). Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. Futures, 39(4), 341–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mivart, G. (1871). On the genesis of species. London: Macmillan and Co. Retrieved from http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/20818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morson, G. S., & Emerson, C. (1990). Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of Prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nadin, M. (Ed.). (2015). Anticipation: Learning from the past – the Russian/Soviet contributions to the science of anticipation. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Nishida, K. (1987). Last writings: Nothingness and the religious worldview. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nishitani, K. (1991). Nishida Kitaro. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Perez, C. (1985). Microelectronics, long waves and world structural change: New perspectives for developing countries. World Development, 13(3), 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perez, C. (2002). Technological revolutions and financial capital: The dynamics of bubbles and golden ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rashevsky, N. (1954). Topology and life: In search of general mathematical principles in biology and sociology. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 16, 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosen, R. (1958a). A relational theory of biological systems. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 20, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosen, R. (1958b). The representation of biological system from the standpoint of the theory of categories. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 20, 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosen, R. (1985). Anticipatory systems: Philosophical, mathematical and methodological foundations. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rosen, R. (1987). On the scope of syntactics in mathematics and science: The machine metaphor. In J. L. Casti & A. Karlqvist (Eds.), Real brains, artificial minds (pp. 1–23). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  45. Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: A comprehensible inquiry into the nature, origin and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Russell, B. (1946). History of western philosophy. London: Unwin Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  47. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Schumpeter, J. A. (2005). The analysis of economic change. Reprinted from review of economic statistics, May 1935, 2–10. In R. V. Clemence (Ed.), Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles and the evolution of capitalism (pp. 134–149). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In L. Silverstone & R. Mansell (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 44–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sokolova, L. V. (2015). On the legacy and life of academician Alexei A. Ukhtomsky. In M. Nadin (Ed.), Anticipation: Learning from the past – the Russian/Soviet contributions to the science of anticipation (pp. 113–136). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stigler, S. M. (1999). Statistics on the table: The history of statistical concepts and methods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tuomi, I. (1999). Corporate knowledge: Theory and practice of intelligent organizations. Helsinki: Metaxis.Google Scholar
  54. Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of innovation: Change and meaning in the age of the internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Tuomi, I. (2012). Foresight in an unpredictable world. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(8), 735–751.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.715476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1994). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Vygotsky, L., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. Wertsch, J. V., & Tulviste, P. (1996). L.S. Vygotsky and contemporary development of psychology. In H. Daniels (Ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 53–74). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. (Corrected Edition). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  62. Zueva, E. Y., & Zuev, K. B. (2015). The concept of dominance by A.A. Ukhtomsky and anticipation. In M. Nadin (Ed.), Anticipation: Learning from the past – the Russian/Soviet contributions to the science of anticipation (pp. 13–35). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Meaning ProcessingHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study (STIAS)Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations