Advertisement

The Discovery of the First Exoplanets

  • Davide CenadelliEmail author
  • Andrea Bernagozzi
Living reference work entry

Abstract

In this chapter, we will deal with the discovery of the first extrasolar planets around normal stars. This discovery took place in the mid-1990s thanks to the analysis of periodic Doppler shifts in stellar spectra and turned out to be a landmark achievement, in that it established a new field of research that is growing at full speed since then, and at the same time, it answered a question – do other worlds exist in the cosmos? – that dates back to ancient times. This major result was made possible by the impressive improvement in Doppler analysis techniques during the second half of the twentieth century, until the precision boosted to values suitable to detect massive planets in close-in orbits. In the late 1980s, two objects came to the limelight: HD 114762 b and γ Cep b. They were suspected to be exoplanets, but it was not possible to rule out alternative explanations, so no undisputable discovery could be claimed. A few years later, in 1995, the discovery of 51 Peg b was announced and confirmed as the first secure one. However, the features of this planet were quite weird as compared to those of the planets of the Solar System, as it was massive and very close to its parent star. Its discovery overturned the previously widespread idea that other systems had to be made like ours and opened the floodgates to the spotting of many other planets. In this chapter, we will tell this story, mainly dwelling upon the historical and epistemological aspects.

Keywords

First exoplanets HD 114762 b Cep b 51 Peg b 70 Vir b 47 UMa b radial velocities dynamics of scientific discovery 

References

  1. Artymowicz P (1993) Disk-satellite interaction via density waves and the eccentricity evolution of bodies embedded in disks. ApJ 419:166–180.  https://doi.org/10.1086/173470ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailes M, Lyne AG, Shemar SL (1991) A planet orbiting the neutron star PSR 1829-10. Nature 352:311–313.  https://doi.org/10.1038/352311a0ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler RP, Marcy GW (1996) A planet orbiting 47 UMa. ApJ Lett 464:L153–L156.  https://doi.org/10.1086/310102ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler RP, Marcy GW, Williams E, Hauser H, Shirts P (1997) Three new “51 Pegasi-type” planets. ApJ 474:L115–L118.  https://doi.org/10.1086/310444ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler RP, Marcy GW, Fischer DA et al (1999) Evidence for multiple companions to υ Andromedae. ApJ 526:916–927.  https://doi.org/10.1086/308035ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell B, Walker GAH (1979) Precision radial velocities with an absorption cell. PASP 91:540–545.  https://doi.org/10.1086/130535ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell B, Walker GAH, Yang S (1988) A search for substellar companions to solar-type stars. ApJ 331:902–921.  https://doi.org/10.1086/166608ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cenadelli D, Bernagozzi A (2015) Youth plus experience: the discovery of 51 Pegasi b. Eur Phys J H 40:527–552.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2015-60041-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charbonneau D, Brown TM, Latham DW, Mayor M (2000) Detection of planetary transits across a sun-like star. ApJ 529:L45–L48.  https://doi.org/10.1086/312457ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Croswell K (1997) Planet quest: the epic discovery of alien solar systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Curiel S, Cantó J, Georgiev L, Chávez CE, Poveda A (2011) A fourth planet orbiting υ Andromedae. A&A 525(A):78.  https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015693ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duquennoy A, Mayor M (1991) Multiplicity among solar type stars in the solar neighbourhood. II distribution of the orbital elements in an unbiased sample. A&A 248:485–524ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Duquennoy A, Mayor M, Halbwachs JL (1991) Multiplicity among solar type stars in the solar neighbourhood. I. CORAVEL radial velocity observations of 291 stars. A&A Suppl Ser 88:281–324ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Fellget PB (1953) A proposal for a radial velocity photometer. Opt Acta 2:9–15ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldreich P, Tremaine S (1980) Disk-satellite interactions. ApJ 241:425–441.  https://doi.org/10.1086/158356ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray D (1997) Absence of a planetary signature in the spectra of the star 51 Pegasi. Nature 385:795–796.  https://doi.org/10.1038/385795a0ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray D (1998) A planetary companion for 51 Pegasi implied by absence of pulsations in the stellar spectra. Nature 391:153–154.  https://doi.org/10.1038/34365ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gregory HW, Marcy GW, Butler RP, Vogt SS (2000) A transiting “51 Pegasi-like” planet. ApJ 529:L41–L44.  https://doi.org/10.1086/312458ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Griffin RF (1967) A photoelectric radial-velocity spectrometer. ApJ 148:465–476.  https://doi.org/10.1086/149168ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffin RF, Griffin RE (1973) On the possibility of determining stellar radial velocities to 0.01 km s-1. MNRAS 162:243–253ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatzes AP, Cochran WD, Johns-Krull CM (1997) Testing the planet hypothesis: a search for variability in the spectral-line shapes of 51 Pegasi. ApJ 478:374–380.  https://doi.org/10.1086/303770ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatzes AP, Cochran WD, Bakker EG (1998) Further evidence for the planet around 51 Pegasi. Nature 391:154–156.  https://doi.org/10.1038/34369ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hatzes AP, Cochran WD, Endl M et al (2003) A planetary companion to γ Cephei a. ApJ 599:1383–1394.  https://doi.org/10.1086/379281ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Joergens V (ed) (2014) 50 years of brown dwarfs – from prediction to discovery to forefront of research, Astrophysics and space science library, vol 401. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  25. Latham DW (2012) The unseen companion of HD 114762. New Astron. Rev. 56:16–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2011.06.003ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Latham DW, Mazeh T, Stefanik RP, Mayor M, Burki G (1989) The unseen companion of HD114762: a probable brown dwarf. Nature 339:38–40.  https://doi.org/10.1038/339038a0ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin DNC, Papaloizou J (1986) On the tidal interaction between protoplanets and the protoplanetary disk. III – orbital migration of protoplanets. ApJ 309:846–857.  https://doi.org/10.1086/164653ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin CC, Shu FH (1964) On the spiral structure of disk galaxies. ApJ 140:646–655.  https://doi.org/10.1086/147955ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin DNC, Bodenheimer P, Richardson DC (1996) Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi to its present location. Nature 380:606–607.  https://doi.org/10.1038/380606a0ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luhman KL (2013) Discovery of a binary Brown dwarf at 2 pc from the sun. ApJ lett 767: article id. L1, 6 pp.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/767/1/L1ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lyne AG, Bailes M (1992) No planet orbiting PSR 1829-10. Nature 355:213.  https://doi.org/10.1038/355213b0ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marcy GW (1998) Extrasolar planets: back in focus. Nature 401:127.  https://doi.org/10.1038/34298ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marcy GW, Butler RP (1995) The planet around 51 Pegasi. Bull Astron Am Soc 27:1379ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Marcy GW, Butler RP (1996) A planetary companion to 70 Vir. ApJ Lett 464:L147–L151.  https://doi.org/10.1086/310096ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marcy GW, Butler RP, Williams E et al (1997) The planet around 51 Pegasi. ApJ 481:926–935.  https://doi.org/10.1086/304088ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayor M, Frei PY (2003) New worlds in the cosmos. The discovery of exoplanets. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayor M, Queloz D (1995) A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star. Nature 378:355–359.  https://doi.org/10.1038/378355a0ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayor M, Lovis C, Santos NC (2014) Doppler spectroscopy as a path to the detection of earth-like planets. Nature 513:328–335.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13780ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Serkowski K (1978) Possibilities of improving the accuracy of stellar radial velocities. In: Hack M (ed) Proceedings of the 4th international colloquium on astrophysics, high resolution spectrometry, Trieste, 3–7 July 1978, pp 245–267Google Scholar
  40. Serkowski K, Frecker JE, Heacox WD, Roland EH (1979a) Fabry-Perot radial velocity spectrometer. In: Proceedings of the seminar on instrumentation in astronomy III, Tucson, 29 Jan–1 Feb 1979. Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, pp 130–133.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.957075
  41. Serkowski K, Frecker JE, Heacox WD, KenKnight CE, Roland EH (1979b) Retrograde rotation of the stratosphere of Venus measured with a Fabry-Perot radial velocity spectrometer. ApJ 228:630–634.  https://doi.org/10.1086/156888ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walker GAH (2012) The first high-precision radial velocity search for extra-solar planets. New Astron. Rev. 56:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2011.06.001ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walker GAH, Bohlender DA, Walker AR et al (1992) γ Cephei: rotation or planetary companion? ApJ Letters 396:L91–L94.  https://doi.org/10.1086/186524ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolszczan A (1994) Confirmation of earth-mass planets orbiting the millisecond pulsar PSR 1257+12. Science 264:538–342.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.264.5158.538ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wolszczan A, Frail DA (1992) A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR 1257+12. Nature 355:145–147.  https://doi.org/10.1038/355145a0ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Osservatorio Astronomico della Regione Autonoma Valle d’AostaNus (Aosta)Italy
  2. 2.Scuola di Scienze e Tecnologia, Sezione di Geologia, UNICAMearth Working GroupUniversità degli Studi di CamerinoCamerinoItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Tsevi Mazeh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Physics and AstronomyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations