Advertisement

X-Ray Tomography

  • Johann Kastner
  • Christoph Heinzl
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Over the past years, a large number of novel X-ray imaging and data processing methods have been developed. The application areas of X-ray computed tomography (XCT) are highly diverse and extensive, since any material or component may be examined using XCT. The major application areas of XCT in science and industry are found in non-destructive testing, 3D materials characterization, and dimensional measurements (metrology). The nonmedical XCT market is steadily growing, but the full potential of this technique for industrial applications has not been exploited yet. There are many useful XCT applications which still have to be discovered. This chapter provides an overview of the principles of XCT, of drawbacks such as measurement artifacts as well as their correction, of different XCT methods and scanning protocols, as well as of applications of XCT. The focus of this chapter lies on XCT for materials simulation and high-resolution, quantitative, in situ, and phase-contrast XCT.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the project “Multimodal and in-situ characterization of inhomogeneous materials” (MiCi) of the federal government of Upper Austria and the European Regional Development Fund (EFRE) in the framework of the EU program IWB2020. The research leading to these results has also received funding from the FFG Bridge Early Stage, project no. 851249 (“Advanced multimodal data analysis and visualization of composites based on grating interferometer micro-CT data (ADAM)”) as well as from the FWF-FWO 2016 Lead Agency Call for Joint Projects, project no. I3261-N36/S004217 N (“Quantitative X-ray tomography of advanced polymer composites”).

References

  1. Adams R, Bischof L (1994) Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16:641–647.  https://doi.org/10.1109/34.295913.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amirkhanov A (2012) Visualization of Industrial 3DXCT Data, PhD Thesis, TU ViennaGoogle Scholar
  3. Amirkhanov A, Heinzl C, Reiter M, Gröller E (2010) Visual Optimality and Stability Analysis of 3DCT Scan Positions. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 16:1477–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amirkhanov A, Heinzl C, Kastner J, Gröller E, Fuzzy CT (2013) Metrology: dimensional measurements on uncertain data. In: SCCG proceedings (digital library) Smolenice castle, Slovakia, p 8Google Scholar
  5. Amirkhanov A, Amirkhanov A, Salaberger D, Kastner J, Gröller M, Heinzl C (2016) Visual analysis of defects in glass fiber reinforced polymers for 4DCT interrupted in-situ tests. Comput Graphics Forum 35:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banhart J (ed) (2008) Advanced tomographic methods in materials research and engineering. Research Oxford University Press, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartscher M, Neuschaefer-Rube U, Illemann J, Borges de Oliveira F, Stolfi A, Carmignato S (2018) Qualification and testing of CT systems. In: Carmignato S, De Wulf W, Bartscher M (eds) Industrial X-ray computed tomography. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  8. Baruchel J, Buffiere JY, Maire E, Peix G (eds) (2000) X-ray tomography in material science. Hermes Science Publications, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Beucher S, Lantuejoul C (1979) Use of watersheds in contour detection. In: International workshop on image processing: real-time edge and motion detection/estimation, Rennes, Sept 1979Google Scholar
  10. BIPM JCGM 100 (2008) Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. International Organisation for Standardisation, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  11. Buffiere J-Y, Maire E, Adrien J, Masse J-P, Boller E (2010) In-situ experiments with X ray tomography: an attractive tool for experimental mechanics. Exp Mech 50:289–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buzug TM (2008) Computed tomography: from photon statistics to modern Cone-Beam CT. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  13. Carmignato S, Dewulf W, Leach R (eds) (2018) Industrial X-ray computed tomography. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  14. De Chiffre L, Carmignato S, Kruth JP, Schmitt R, Weckenmann A (2014) Industrial applications of computed tomography. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63:655–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW (1984) Practical cone beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am 6:612–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gusenbauer C, Reiter M, Salaberger D, Kastner J (2016) Comparison of metal artefact reduction algorithms from medicine applied to industrial XCT applications. In: Proceedings 19th World conference on non-destructive testing 2016 (WCNDT 2016). www.ndt.net
  17. Hanke R, Fuchs T, Uhlmann N (2008) X-ray based methods for non-destructive testing and material characterization. Nucl Inst Methods Phys Res A 59:14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrer B, Kastner J (2011) Cone Beam CT for non-destructive testing Fabrication and Characterization in the Micro-Nano Range: new Trends for two and three dimensional Structures, ‘X-ray Microtomography: characterization of structures and defect analysis’. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 119–150Google Scholar
  19. Heinzl C, Stappen S (2017) STAR: visual Computing in Materials Science. Comput Graphics Forum 36(3):647–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heinzl C, Kastner J, Gröller E (2007) Surface extraction from multi-material components for metrology using dual energy CT. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 13:1520–1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heinzl C, Amirkhanov A, Kastner J (2018) Processing, analysis and visualization of CT data. In: Carmignato S, De Wulf W, Bartscher M (eds) Industrial X-ray computed tomography. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  22. Herman GT (1979) Correction for Beam Hardening in computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 24:81–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hermanek P, Carmignato S (2017) Porosity measurements by X-ray computed tomography: accuracy evaluation using a calibrated object. Precis Eng 49:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hsieh J (2003) Computed tomography, principles, design, artifacts and recent advances. In: SPIE The International Society for Optical Engineering, BellinghamGoogle Scholar
  25. Janssens E, Pereira LF, De Beenhouwer J, Tsang R, Van Dael M, Verboven P, Nicolaï B, Sijbers J (2016) Fast inline inspection by Neural Network Based Filtered Backprojection: application to apple inspection. Case Stud Nondestruct Test Eval 6:14–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csndt.2016.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen T, Bech M, Bunk O, Donath T, David C, Feidenhans’l R, Pfeiffer F (2010) Directional x-ray dark-field imaging. Phys Med Biol 55:3317–3323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joseph PM, Spital RD (1982) The effects of scatter in x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys 9:464–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kasperl S (2005) Qualitätsverbesserungen durch referenzfreie Artefaktreduzierung und Oberflächennormierung in der industriellen 3D-Computertomographie. PhD Thesis, Technische Fakultät der Universität Erlangen, NürnbergGoogle Scholar
  29. Kastner J (2016) Proceedings of 6th conference on industrial computed tomography (iCT2016) 2016, 9–12 Feb 2016, Wels. www.ndt.net
  30. Kastner J, Harrer B, Requena G, Brunke O (2010a) A comparative study of high resolution cone beam X-ray tomography and synchrotron tomography applied to Fe- and Al-alloys. NDT&E Int 43:599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kastner J, Plank B, Salaberger D, Sekelja J (2010b) Defect and porosity determination of fiber reinforced polymers by X-ray computed tomography. In: 2nd international symposium on NDT in Aerospace. www.ndt.net
  32. Kastner J, Salaberger D, Plank B (2012a) High resolution X-ray computed tomography of fibre and particle filled polymers. In: Proceedings of 12th World conference on non-destructive testing, Durban. www.ndt.net
  33. Kastner J, Salaberger D and Plank B (2012b) Microstructure characterization of high-strength Al-alloys by high resolution X-ray computed tomography. In: Proceedings of 12th World conference on non-destructive testingGoogle Scholar
  34. Kastner J, Harrer B, Requena G (2012c) Non-destructive characterization of polymers and Al-alloys by poly-chromatic cone-beam phase contrast tomography. Mater Charact 64:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kastner J, Zaunschirm S, Baumgartner S, Requena G, Pinto H, Garcés G (2014) 2D-microstructure characterization of thermo-mecanically treated Mg-alloys by high resolution X-ray computed tomography. In: 11th European conference on non-destructive testing (ECNDT 2014), October 6–10, PragueGoogle Scholar
  36. Kastner J, Heinzl C, Plank B, Salaberger D, Gusenbauer C, Senck S (2017a) New X-ray computed tomography methods for research and industry. In: 7th conference on industrial computed Tomography (iCT2017), LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  37. Kastner J, Salaberger D, Heinzl C, Gusenbauer C, Rao G (2017b) High resolution X-ray computed tomography for non-destructive characterization and in-situ investigations. In: 15th Asia Pacific conference for non-destructive testing (APCNDT2017), SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  38. Krumm M, Kasperl K, Franz M (2008) Reducing Non-linear artifacts of multimaterial objects in industrial 3D computed tomography. NDT&E Int 41:242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kruth JP, Bartscher M, Carmignato S, Schmitt R, De Chiffre L, Weckenmann A (2011) Computed tomography for dimensional metrology. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60:821–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lambert JH (1760) Photometria, sive de mensura et gradibus luminis colorum et umbrae. Sumptibus Vidae Eberhardi Klett, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  41. Landis EN, Keane DT (2010) X-ray microtomography. Mater Charact 61:1305–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu Y, Straumit I, Vasiukov D, Lomov SV, Panier S (2017) Prediction of linear and non-linear behavior of 3D woven composite using mesoscopic voxel models recon-structed from X-ray micro-tomography. Compos Struct 179:568–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maire E, Withers PJ (2014) Quantitative X-ray tomography. Int Mater Rev 59:1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Malecki A D (2013) X-ray tensor tomography from two-dimensional directional X-ray dark-field imaging to three dimensions, PhD Thesis, TU MunichGoogle Scholar
  45. McDonald AA, Holzner C, Lauridsen EM, Reischig P, Merkle AP, Withers PJ (2017) Microstructural evolution during sintering of copper particles studied by laboratory diffraction contrast tomography (LabDCT). Sci Rep 7:5251.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04742-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meyer E, Raupach R, Lell M, Schmidt B, Kachelrieß M (2010) Normalized metal artifact reduction (NMAR) in computed tomography. Med Phys 37:5482–5493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Millner MR, McDavid WD, Waggener RG, Dennis MJ, Payne WH, Sank VJ (1979) Extraction of information from CT scans at different energies. Med Phys 6:70–71.  https://doi.org/10.1118/1.594555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Müller P (2012) Coordinate metrology by traceable computed tomography, pavel müller, PhD thesis, Technical University of DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  49. Oberpeilsteiner S, Salaberger D, Reiter T (2014) Coupling of in-situ-CT with virtual testing by FEM of short fiber reinforced materials. In: Proceeding ICT2014, 25–28 Feb 2014, WelsGoogle Scholar
  50. Oh W, Lindquist WB (1999) Image thresholding by indicator kriging. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 21:590–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oster R (1999) Computed tomography as a non-destructive test method for Fiber Main Rotor Blades in development, series and maintenance. In: Proceedings of international symposium on digital industrial radiology and computed tomography Berlin (DGZfP-Berichtsband 67-CD), www.dgzfp.de. (DGZfP-Berichtsband 67-CD)
  52. Paganin D, Mayo SC, Gureyev TE, Miller PR, Wilkins SW (2002) Simultaneous phase and amplitude extraction from a single defocused image of a homogeneous object. J Microsc 206:33–40.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01010.xMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pereira L, Janssens E, Cavalcanti G, Tsang IR, Van Dael M, Verboven P, Nicolai B, Sijbers J (2017) Inline discrete tomography system. Comput Electron Agric 138:117–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.04.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pfeiffer F, Weitkamp T, Bunk O, David C (2006) Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance X-ray sources. Nat Phys 2:258–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Plank B, Kastner J, Schneider R, Busch R (2009) Charakterisierung von Porositäten in Sintermetallen mit 3D-CT Anwendungsbeispiel selektives Lasersintern. In: Proceedings of DGZfP annual conference. DGZfP, Münster, pp 810–816Google Scholar
  56. Prade F, Schaff F, Senck S, Meyer P, Mohr J, Kastner J, Pfeiffer F (2017) Nondestructive characterization of fiber orientation in short fiber reinforced polymer composites with X-ray vector radiography. NDT&E Int 86:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reh A, Plank B, Kastner J, Gröller E, Heinzl C (2012) Porosity maps: interactive exploration and visual analysis of porosity in carbon fiber reinforced polymers using X-ray computed tomography. Comput Graph Forum 31(3):1185–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reims N, Schoen T, Boehnel M, Sukowski F, Firsching M (2014) Strategies for efficient scanning and reconstruction methods on very large objects with high-energy x-ray computed tomography. SPIE Optical Engineering & Applications:921209–921209Google Scholar
  59. Reiter M, Erler M, Kuhn C, Gusenbauer C, Kastner J (2016) SimCT: a simulation tool for X-ray imaging. In: Proceedings 6th conference on industrial computed tomography (iCT2016) 2016, 9–12 February 2016, Wels. www.ndt.net
  60. Requena G, Cloetens P, Altendorfer W, Poletti C, Tolnai D, Warchomicka F, Degischer HP (2009) Sub-micrometer synchrotron tomography of multiphase metals using Kirkpatrick–Baez optics. Scr Mater 61:760–763.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.025 ISSN 1359-6462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Revol V, Plank B, Kaufmann R, Kastner J, Kottler C, Neels A (2013) Laminate fiber structure characterization of carbon fiber-reinforced polymers by X-ray scatter dark field imaging with a grating interferometer. NDT&E Int 58:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Russ JC (2002) The image processing handbook. CRC Press LLC, Boca RatonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. Salaberger D, Kannappan KA, Kastner J, Reussner J, Auinger T (2011) CT Data evaluation of fiber reinforced polymers to determine fiber length distribution. Int Polym Process 3:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Salvo L, Suérya M, Marmottant A, Limodin N, Bernard D (2010) 3D imaging in material science: application of X-ray tomography. C R Phys 11:641–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schladitz K (2011) Quantitative micro-CT. J Microsc 243:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schmitt R, Niggemann C (2010) Uncertainty in measurement for X-Ray computer tomography using calibrated work pieces. Meas Sci Technol 21:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sezgin M, Sankur B (2004) Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation. J Electron Imaging 13(1):146–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sheppard AP, Sok RM, Averdunk H (2004) Techniques for image enhancement and segmentation of tomographic images of porous materials. Phys A 339:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Straumit S, Hahn C, Winterstein E, Plank B, Lomov SV, Wevers M (2016) Computation of permeability of a non-crimp carbon textile reinforcement based on X-ray computed tomography images open overlay panel. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 81:289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tuy-Smith K (1983) An inversion formula for cone-beam reconstruction. SIAM J Appl Math 43:546–552MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ueda R, Kudo H, Dong J (2017) Applications of compressed sensing image reconstruction to sparse view phase tomography. In: Proceedings of SPIE 10391, developments in X-ray tomography XI, 103910H, 3 Oct 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2273691
  72. Wiegert J (2007) Scattered radiation in cone-beam computed tomography: analysis, quantification and compensation. PhD Thesis, RWTH Aachen, AachenGoogle Scholar
  73. Williams J, Yazzie KE, Padilla E, Chawla N, Xiao X, De Carlo F (2013) Understanding fatigue crack growth in aluminum alloys by in-situ X-ray synchrotron tomography. Int J Fatigue 57:79–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yashiro W, Terui Y, Kawabata K, Momose A (2010) On the origin of visibility contrast in x-ray Talbot interferometry. Opt Express 18:16890–16901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhigeng P, Jianfeng L (2007) A bayes-based region-growing algorithm for medical image segmentation. Comput Sci Eng 9:32–38Google Scholar
  76. Zhou S-A, Brahme A (2008) Development of phase-contrast X-ray imaging techniques and potential medical applications. Phys Med 24:129–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhou J, Maisl M, Reiter H, Arnold W (1996) Computed laminography for materials testing. Appl Phys Lett 68:3500–3502CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences Upper AustriaWelsAustria

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ida Nathan
    • 1
  • Norbert Meyendorf
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of AkronAkronUSA
  2. 2.Center for Nondestructive EvaluationIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations