Advertisement

Neonatology pp 1007-1013 | Cite as

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Neonates

  • Anne Greenough
  • Niovi Papalexopoulou
  • Munir Ahmed
  • Adam P. R. Smith
Reference work entry

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a modified form of cardiopulmonary bypass such that patients can be supported for a prolonged period, even up to weeks, until the patient’s respiratory and/or cardiac function recovers or definitive treatment is administered. A systematic review of results of 244 infants entered into randomized trials demonstrated that ECMO was associated with a reduction in mortality (relative risk 0.44, 95% CI 0.31–0.61) and the number needed to treat was three. Survival is best in neonates with meconium aspiration syndrome and worse in those with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Chronic respiratory, neurological, and growth problems have been reported following ECMO. Overall, follow-up of infants into the largest randomized trial, the UK ECMO trial, showed at 7 years of age a continuing benefit of ECMO for the primary outcome of death or severe disability (relative risk 0.64, 95% CI 0.47–0.86; p = 0.004). While treatment was cost-effective in most diagnostic groups, the cost ratio for infants with CDH was far poorer. Subsequent advances in other respiratory support techniques for term and near-term infants, including high-frequency oscillation and nitric oxide, and, however, have reduced the number of cases referred for ECMO and altered the profile of such patients.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Nicholas Barrett (Consultant in Critical Care at Guy’s and St Thomas’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust) for providing data on the current mortality and Mrs Deirdre Gibbons for secretarial assistance.

The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Facility at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health.

References

  1. Arzuaga BH, Groner A (2013) Utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in congenital hypertrophic cardiomyopathy caused by maternal diabetes. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 6:345–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartlett RH, Gazzaniga AB, Jefferies MR et al (1976) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cardiopulmonary support in infancy. Trans Am Soc Artif Int Organs 22:80–93Google Scholar
  3. Bartlett RH, Roloff DW, Cornell RG et al (1985) Extracorporeal circulation in neonatal respiratory failure: a prospective randomized study. Pediatrics 76:479–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beardsmore C, Dundas I, Poole K et al (2000) Respiratory function in survivors of the United Kingdom Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161:1129–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett CC, Johnson A, Field DJ et al (2001) UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: follow-up to age 4 years. Lancet 357:1094–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coppola CP, Tyree M, Larry K et al (2008) A 22-year experience in global transport extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg 43:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dyamenahalli U, Tuzcu V, Fontenot E et al (2012) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for intractable primary arrhythmias and complete congenital heart block in newborns and infants: short- term and medium-term outcomes. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ELSO (2015) Guidelines for neonatal respiratory failure 2013. [Cited 18 Dec 2015]. Available from: https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/IGD/Archive/FileManager/8588d1a580cusersshyerdocumentselsoguidelinesforneonatalrespiratoryfailure13.pdf
  9. Frenckner B, Radell P (2008) Respiratory failure and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Semin Pediatr Surg 17:34–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibbon JH Jr (1954) Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med 37:171–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gross SJ, Bifano EM, D’Euqenio DB et al (1994) 86 prospective randomized controlled trial of conventional treatment or transport for ecmo in infants with severe persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN): two year follow up. Pediatr Res 36:17A-AGoogle Scholar
  12. Hintz SR, Suttner DM, Sheehan AM et al (2000) Decreased use of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): how new treatment modalities have affected ECMO utilization. Pediatrics 106:1339–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ijsselstijn H, van Heijst AF (2014) Long-term outcome of children treated with neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: increasing problems with increasing age. Semin Perinatol 38:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McMullan DM, Thiagarajan RR, Smith KM et al (2014) Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in term and premature neonates. Pediatr Crit Care Med 15:e9–e16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McNally H, Bennett CC, Elbourne D et al (2006) United Kingdom collaborative randomized trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: follow-up to age 7 years. Pediatrics 117:e845–e854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morris AH, Wallace CJ, Menlove RL et al (1994) Randomized clinical trial of pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation and extracorporeal CO2 removal for adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149:295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mugford M, Elbourne D, Field D (2008) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe respiratory failure in newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3, CD001340Google Scholar
  18. Noah MA, Peek GJ, Finney SJ et al (2011) Referral to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center and mortality among patients with severe 2009 influenza A(H1N1). JAMA 306:1659–1668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Rourke PP, Crone RK, Vacanti JP et al (1989) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and conventional medical therapy in neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a prospective randomized study. Pediatrics 84:957–963PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Organization ELS (2015) ECLS registry report – international summary 2015 July. Available from: https://www.elso.org/Registry/Statistics/InternationalSummary.aspx
  21. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R et al (2009) Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374:1351–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Petrou S, Bischof M, Bennett C et al (2006) Cost-effectiveness of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation based on 7-year results from the United Kingdom Collaborative ECMO Trial. Pediatrics 117:1640–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Polito A, Barrett CS, Wypij D et al (2013) Neurologic complications in neonates supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. An analysis of ELSO registry data. Intensive Care Med 39:1594–1601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prodhan P, Stroud M, El-Hassan N et al (2014) Prolonged extracorporeal membrane oxygenator support among neonates with acute respiratory failure: a review of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. ASAIO J 60:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qureshi FG, Jackson HI, Brown J et al (2013) The changing population of the United States and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Surg Res 184:572–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rais BK, Van Meurs KP (2014) Venoarterial versus venovenous ECMO for neonatal respiratory failure. Semin Perinatol 38:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rais-Bahrami K, Van Meurs KP (2014) Venoarterial versus venovenous ECMO for neonatal respiratory failure. Semin Perinatol 38:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rehder KJ, Turner DA, Cheifetz IM (2013) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for neonatal and pediatric respiratory failure: an evidence-based review of the past decade (2002–2012). Pediatr Crit Care Med 14:851–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spoel M, Laas R, Gischler SJ et al (2012) Diagnosis-related deterioration of lung function after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eur Respir J 40:1531–1537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. UK Collaborative ECMO Trial Group (1996) UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Lancet 348:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van der Cammen-van Zijp M, Janssen A, Raets M et al (2014) Motor performance after neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a longitudinal evaluation. Pediatrics 134:e427–e435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vasavada R, Feng Q, Undar A (2011) Current status of pediatric/neonatal extracorporeal life support: clinical outcomes, circuit evolution, and translational research. Perfusion 26:294–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zapol WM, Snider MT, Hill JD et al (1979) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe acute respiratory failure. A randomized prospective study. JAMA 242:2193–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Greenough
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Niovi Papalexopoulou
    • 1
  • Munir Ahmed
    • 1
  • Adam P. R. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, MRC Centre for Allergic Mechanisms of AsthmaKing’s College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.NIHR Biomedical Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.NICUKing’s College HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations