Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

UCLA Loneliness Scale

  • Heidi M. PontinenEmail author
  • Jeffrey A. Swails
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_95-1

Definition

The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) is a 20-item item self-report inventory that uses a four-point Likert-type scale format to assess subjective feelings of loneliness (Russell 1996).

Introduction

The UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3 is the third installment and was developed for two primary reasons that remained constant since the first edition of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russell 1996; Russell et al. 1978, 1980). First, the UCLA Loneliness Scales (original, revised, and version 3) intended to address concerns about preexisting measures of loneliness showing internal reliability, lack of generalizability, and excessive length (Russell et al. 1978). The final product was the UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3, which is superior in its internal consistency, concurrent validity, and construct validity (Russell 1996; Britton and Conner 2007; Vassar and Crosby 2008; DiTammaso et al. 2004).

Secondly, all versions of the UCLA Loneliness Scale were designed to explore the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, K. B., Sanders, S., & Auth, E. A. (2004). Loneliness and depression in independent living retirement communities: Risk and resilience factors. Aging & Mental Health, 8, 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Britton, P. C., & Conner, K. R. (2007). Brief report: Reliability of the UCLA loneliness scale in opiate dependent individuals. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 368–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DiTommaso, E., Brannen, C., & Best, L. (2004). Measurement and validity characteristics of the short version of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freberg, K., Adams, R., McGaughey, K., & Freberg, L. (2010). The rich get richer: Online and offline social connectivity predicts subjective loneliness. Media Psychology Review, 3(1), 103–115.Google Scholar
  5. Geller, J., Janson, P., McGovern, E., & Valdini, A. (1999). Loneliness as a predictor of hospital emergency department use. Journal of Family Practice, 48, 801–804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gul, N. (2015). Translation and adaptation: The loneliness scale University of California Los Angeles. Science International (Lahore), 27, 731–732.Google Scholar
  7. McWhirter, B. T. (1990). Loneliness: A review of current literature, with implications for counseling and research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 68, 417–422.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb02521.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Russell, D. (1996). The UCLA loneliness scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sisenwein, R. J. (1964). Loneliness and the individual as viewed by himself and others (Doctoral dissertation). (University Microfilms No. 65–4768).Google Scholar
  12. Steptoe, A., Owen, N., Kunz-Ebrecht, S. R., & Brydon, L. (2004). Loneliness and neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and inflammatory stress responses in middle-aged men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 593–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vassar, M., & Crosby, J. W. (2008). A reliability generalization study of coefficient alpha for the UCLA loneliness scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 601–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Weinan, Z., Kaiyin, Y., Ying, H., & Ze-Wei, M. (2016). Explicit self-esteem, loneliness, and pathological internet use among Chinese adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44, 965–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yildiz, M. A., & Duy, B. (2014). Adaptation of the short-form of the UCLA loneliness scale (ULS-8) to Turkish for the adolescents. Dusunen Adam: Journal of Psychiatry & Neurological Sciences, 27, 194–203.  https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2014270302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zarei, S., Memari, A. H., Moshayedi, P., & Shayestehfar, M. (2016). Validity and reliability of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 in Farsi. Educational Gerontology, 42, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWichita State UniversityWichitaUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Brendan Clark
    • 1
  1. 1.Wichita State UniversityWichitaUSA