Responsibility – The extent to which an outcome of an event (often a behavior or specific consequence) is attributed to a person or object directly or indirectly related to that particular outcome.
The current section reviews and compares several models of responsibility within the context of attribution research. Specific components and dimensions of each model are discussed as they relate to other models. These models are then couched within the historical trends and emerging trends of research on responsibility.
A person’s responsibility for an event or outcome has captured attention in psychology for several decades. This stems from a general motivation to explain others’ behaviors and distinguish whether or not the behavior can be attributed to the disposition of that person. Early theories of behavior have focused on the distinction between internal and external causes (this primarily included...
- Hart, H. L. A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shultz, T. R., & Schleifer, M. (1983). Towards a refinement of attribution concepts. In J. Jaspars, F. D. Fincham, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Attribution theory and research: Conceptual, developmental and social dimensions (pp. 37–62). London: Academic.Google Scholar
- Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar