Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Reference Group Effect

  • Christoph SchildEmail author
  • Karolina Ścigała
  • Ingo Zettler
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_840-1

Definition

The Reference Group Effect (RGE) describes “the confounding role of context in comparisons of mean questionnaire responses across different groups” (Heine et al. 2002, p. 904).

Introduction

According to social comparison theory (Festinger 1954), people seek for evaluation of their or others characteristics since an inaccurate estimation of characteristics can lead to negative consequences in a variety of situations. If objective means are not given, the evaluations derive from comparisons with others. Heine et al. (2002) adopted this idea and suggested that such comparison processes might be the underlying mechanism of the Reference Group Effect (RGE) which describes “the confounding role of context in comparisons of mean questionnaire responses across different groups” (Heine et al. 2002, p. 904).

In the following, we will (i) introduce the RGE in more detail and (ii) explain how it can affect personality research. Furthermore, we will (iii) follow up with implications for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Credé, M., Bashshur, M., & Niehorster, S. (2010). Reference group effects in the measurement of personality and attitudes. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 390–399.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.497393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.  https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Heine, S. J., Buchtel, E. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2008). What do cross-national comparisons of personality traits tell us? The case of conscientiousness. Psychological Science, 19, 309–313.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02085.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2003). Big-Fish-Little-Pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58, 364–376.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rothenbusch, S., Zettler, I., Voss, T., Lösch, T., & Trautwein, U. (2016). Exploring reference group effects on teachers’ nominations of gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 883–897.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wood, A. M., Brown, G. D. A., Maltby, J., & Watkinson, P. (2012). How are personality judgments made? A cognitive model of reference group effects, personality scale responses, and behavioral reactions. Journal of Personality, 80, 1275–1311.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00763.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Schild
    • 1
    Email author
  • Karolina Ścigała
    • 1
  • Ingo Zettler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Section editors and affiliations

  • Patrizia Velotti
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Educational SciencesUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Sapienza University of RomeRomeItaly