Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Projective Tests

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson, L. (1986). The comparative validities of the Rorschach and MMPI: A meta-analysis. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 27, 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardos, A. N., & Doropoulou, M. (2014). Draw-A-person screening procedure for emotional disturbance validity evidence. In L. Handler, A. D. Thomas, L. Handler, & A. D. Thomas (Eds.), Drawings in assessment and psychotherapy: Research and application (pp. 42–57). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. C., & Kaufman, S. H. (1970). Kinetic family drawings (K-F-D): An introduction to understanding children through kinetic drawings. Oxford: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. S., & Ones, D. S. (2010). Another perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 1092–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costantino, G., Malgady, R. G., & Rogler, L. H. (1988). TEMAS (tell-me-A-story) manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E. (1974). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner, J. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garb, H. N. (1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment, 6, 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • George, C., & West, M. (2001). The development and preliminary validation of a new measure of adult attachment: The adult attachment projective. Attachment & Human Development, 3, 30–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730010024771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pineda, J. A., Porcelli, P., Hubbard, D., Zennaro, A., & Cauda, F. (2017). Human movement responses to the Rorschach and mirroring activity: An fMRI study. Assessment, 0, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117731813

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodenough, F. (1926). A new approach to the measurement of intelligence of young children. The Pedagogical Seminary and Journal of Genetic Psychology, 33, 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, J. B., Rosenthal, R., Bornstein, R. F., Berry, D. R., & Brunell-Neuleib, S. (1999). A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity. Psychological Assessment, 11, 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, C. J., & Bornstein, R. F. (Eds.). (2014). Multimethod clinical assessment. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, G. H., & Rosanoff, A. (1910). A study of association in insanity. American Journal of Insanity, 67, 37–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerner, J. (1857). Klexographien: Part VI. In R. Pissen (Ed.), Kerners Wake. Berlin: Boag & Co..

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J. (1998). Technical foundations for measuring ego development: The Washington University sentence completion test. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure (A method of personality investigation). In Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure: A method of personality investigation (pp. 3–32). Springfield: Charles C Thomas Publisher.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. J., & Archer, R. P. (2001). The hard science of Rorschach research: What do we know and where do we go? Psychological Assessment, 13, 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. J., & Kurtz, J. E. (2006). Advancing personality assessment terminology: Time to retire ‘objective’ and ‘projective’ as personality test descriptors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 223–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_01

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. J., Viglione, D. J., Mihura, J. L., Erard, R. E., & Erdberg, P. (2011). Rorschach performance assessment system: Administration, coding, interpretation, and technical manual. Toledo: Rorschach Performance Assessment System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, G. J., Viglione, D. J., & Mihura, J. L. (2017). Psychometric foundations of the Rorschach Performance Assessment System (R-PAS). In R. Erard & B. Evans (Eds.), The Rorschach in multimethod forensic practice (pp. 23–91). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihura, J. L., Bombel, G., Dumitrascu, N., Roy, M., & Meadows, E. A. (2018). Why we need a formal systematic approach to validating psychological tests: The case of the Rorschach Comprehensive System. Manuscript accepted with minor revisions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihura, J. L., Meyer, G. J., Dumitrascu, N., & Bombel, G. (2013). The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 548–605. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mihura, J. L., Meyer, G. J., Bombel, G., & Dumitrascu, N. (2015). Standards, accuracy, and questions of bias in Rorschach meta-analyses: Reply to Wood, Garb, Nezworski, Lilienfeld, and Duke (2015). Psychological Bulletin, 141, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mihura, J. L., Roy, M., & Graceffo, R. A. (2017). Psychological assessment training in clinical psychology doctoral programs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1201978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morey, L. C. (1991). The personality assessment inventory: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic apperception test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naglieri, J., McNeish, T., & Bardos, A. (1991). Draw a person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance. Austin: Pro-Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, K. C., Hanson, R. K., & Hunsley, J. (1988). MMPI, Rorschach, and WAIS: A meta-analytic comparison of reliability, stability, and validity. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzler, B., & Alter, B. (1986). Rorschach teaching in APA-approved clinical graduate programs: Ten years later. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5001_6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. E., & Gruber, C. (2005). Roberts-2. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, A. R. (1946). Explorations in personality by the sentence completion method. Journal of Applied Psychology, 30, 169–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rorschach, H. (1942). Psychodiagnostik (Hans Huber, Trans.) Bern: Verlag. (Original work published 1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Searls, D. (2017). The inkblots: Hermann Rorschach, his iconic test, and the power of seeing. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Eichler, W. C., Norman, K. R., & Smith, S. R. (2015). The effectiveness of collaborative/therapeutic assessment for psychotherapy consultation: A pragmatic replicated single-case study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.955917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soilevuo Grønnerød, J., & Grønnerød, C. (2012). The Wartegg Zeichen test: A literature overview and a meta-analysis of reliability and validity. Psychological Assessment, 24, 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sorokowski, P., & Wrembel, M. (2014). Color studies in applied psychology and social sciences: An overview. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology, 12, 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M., Hilsenroth, M., Slavin-Mulford, J., & Pinsker, J. (2011). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global Rating Method (SCORS-G; 4th ed.). Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. V., & Jolley, R. P. (1998). Drawing conclusions: A re-examination of empirical and conceptual bases for psychological evaluation of children from their drawings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01289.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Villemor-Amaral, A. E., Pavan, P. M. P., Tavella, R. R., Cardoso, L. M., & Biasi, F. C. (2016). Validity evidence of the Z-Test-SC for use with children. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 26, 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272664201607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value, and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493–518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, K. R., Bigler, E. D., Dennis, M., Gerhardt, C. A., Rubin, K., Taylor, H. G., et al. (2014). Self-awareness of peer-rated social attributes in children with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40, 272–284.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. M., Garb, H. N., Nezworski, M. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Duke, M. C. (2015). A second look at the validity of widely used Rorschach indices: Comment on Mihura, Meyer, Dumitrascu, and Bombel (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 141, 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. S. (1920). Personal data sheet. Chicago: Stoelting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. V., Beattie, S. G., Galper, D. I., Church, A. S., Bufka, L. F., Brabender, V. M., & Smith, B. L. (2017). Assessment practices of professional psychologists: Results of a national survey. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 48, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000086

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The first author (Joni L Mihura) receives royalties from a psychological test (R-PAS; Meyer et al., 2011) and associated products.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA

    Joni L. Mihura & Emily A. Meadows

Authors
  1. Joni L. Mihura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emily A. Meadows
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joni L. Mihura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Virgil Zeigler-Hill

  2. Oakland University, Rochester, USA

    Todd K. Shackelford

Section Editor information

  1. Department of Educational Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Patrizia Velotti

  2. Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Patrizia Velotti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mihura, J.L., Meadows, E.A. (2018). Projective Tests. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_839-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_839-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation