Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Dictator Game

  • Johannes Leder
  • Astrid Schütz
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_652-1

Definition

The dictator game is an experimental paradigm in which one participant (the dictator) receives an endowment and then decides to what extent she/he wants to split this endowment with another, anonymous participant (the recipient). The action space of the dictator ranges from giving nothing to giving all of the endowment to the recipient. The dictator fully determines the final allocation as the recipient plays a passive role. After learning these rules, the dictator makes a decision. The endowment split, i.e., the pie size given to the recipient, is the dependent variable of the game.

Introduction

Although self-interest drives the homo economicus, does this apply to homo sapiens as well? Researchers have long asked whether humans show willingness to sacrifice personal payoffs to ensure fairness. In the wake of this question, researchers developed the dictator gamewith the goal of answering this question. The dictator game, a kind of bargaining experiment without any...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andreoni, J., & Bernheim, B. D. (2009). Social image and the 50-50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects. Econometrica, 77(5), 1607–1636.  https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA7384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bardsley, N. (2008). Dictator game giving: Altruism or artefact? Experimental Economics, 11, 122–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9172-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bekkers, R. (2007). Measuring altruistic behavior in surveys: The all-or-nothing dictator game. Survey Research Methods, 1(3), 139–144.  https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2007.v1i3.54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandstätter, H., & Güth, W. (2002). Personality in dictator and ultimatum games. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 10(3), 191.Google Scholar
  6. Dana, J. D., Cain, D. M., & Dawes, R. M. (2006). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Costly (but quiet) exit in dictator games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100(2), 193–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dana, J. D., Weber, R. A., & Kuang, X. (2007). Exploiting moral wriggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 33, 67–80.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.400900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A Meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forsythe, R., Horowitz, J. L., Savin, N. E., & Sefton, M. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6(3), 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franzen, A., & Pointner, S. (2013). The external validity of giving in the dictator game. Experimental Economics, 16(2), 155–169.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-012-9337-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2009). Pillars of cooperation: Honesty-humility, social value orientations, and economic behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 516–519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilbig, B. E., Thielmann, I., Hepp, J., Klein, S. A., & Zettler, I. (2015). From personality to altruistic behavior (and back): Evidence from a double-blind dictator game. Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 46–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business, 59(4), 285–300.  https://doi.org/10.1086/296367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhao, K., Ferguson, E., & Smillie, L. D. (2017). Individual differences in good manners rather than compassion predict fair allocations of wealth in the dictator game. Journal of Personality, 85(2), 244–256.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of BambergBambergGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • John F. Rauthmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA