Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Continuum Models

  • James E. MadduxEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_649-1

Continuum models are concerned with identifying and measuring individual differences in psychological phenomena, such as emotion, mood, intelligence, and interpersonal styles.

Models of personality – and their corresponding measurements of personality – typically fall into two broad categories: those that assume that people can be usefully assigned to discrete personality categories or types and those that assume that the best way to understand and measure personality is to view personality as consisting of continuous personality traits or dimensions. Personality typologies are similar to psychiatric diagnostic categories. Psychiatric diagnostic categories put psychological problems into this category or that one without regard to the severity of the person’s problems or to what extent the person displays the characteristics that define a particular diagnostic category. Likewise, a personality typology assumes that a person has this type of personality or that type without regard to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Briggs, K. C., & Myers, I. B. (1998). Myers-Briggs type indicator. Menlo Park: Consulting Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  2. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  3. Gerlach, M., Farb, B., Revelle, W., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2018). A robust data-driven approach identifies four personality types across four large data sets. Nature Human Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0419-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. R. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Center for the Advancement of Well-BeingGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • John F. Rauthmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA