Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Personality Pattern Inventory

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_60-1

Definition

The Personality Pattern Inventory® (PPI) (Kahler 1982, 1996) is a personality assessment instrument designed to provide information regarding individual choices from which specific communication, interaction, and motivational preferences can be determined.

Introduction

In the development of the PPI, Kahler (1982) built on the work of Berne (1961, 1964), who described ego states as thoughts and feelings manifested by corresponding behavior patterns and who said we all construct a scenario for our lives in early childhood under the influence of parental messages. Berne called this scenario “script.” Kahler (1972) developed the concept of the miniscript, drawn from the results of his research into links between scripts and how they are formed. The miniscript shows how we disclose our script in the way we formulate our sentences. This is observable second by second in speech patterns and behavior. The miniscript became the basic construct of the Process Communication Model...

Keywords

Personality Type Character Strength Environmental Preference Personality Structure Kaiser Normalization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ampaw, F. D., Gilbert, M. B., & Donlan, R. A. (2013). Verifying the validity and reliability of the Personality Pattern Inventory: Preliminary results. Journal of Process Communication, 1(1), 27–46.Google Scholar
  2. Berne, E. (1961). Transactional analysis in psychotherapy. New York: Grove.Google Scholar
  3. Berne, E. (1964). Games people play: The psychology of human relationships. New York: Grove.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, D., Pauley, J. A., & Pauley, J. F. (2006). Effective classroom management: Six keys to success. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Collignon, G., Legrand, P., & Parr, J. (2012). Parlez-vous personality. Paris: Intereditions (trans. from French by K. Flangan).Google Scholar
  6. Gilbert, M. B. (2012). Communicating effectively: Tools for educational leaders (2nd ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Education.Google Scholar
  7. Kahler, T. (1972). Predicting academic underachievement in ninth and twelfth grade males with the Kahler Transactional Analysis Script checklist. Dissertations Abstracts International-A, 33(09): 4838. (University Microfilms No. AAT7306052).Google Scholar
  8. Kahler, T. (1979a). Managing with the process communication model. Little Rock: Human Development Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Kahler, T. (1979b). Process therapy in brief. Little Rock: Human Development Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Kahler, T. (1982). Personality pattern inventory. Little Rock: Kahler Communications, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Kahler, T. (1996). Personality pattern inventory (revised). Little Rock: Kahler Communications, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Kahler, T. (2006). The mastery of management, or how to solve the mystery of mismanagement. Little Rock: Kahler Communications.Google Scholar
  13. Kahler, T. (2008). The process therapy model. Little Rock: Taibi Kahler Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Kahler Communications, Inc. (1982). Personality Pattern Inventory validation procedures. Little Rock: Author.Google Scholar
  15. Pauley, J. A., Bradley, D., & Pauley, J. F. (2002). Here’s how to reach me: Matching instruction to personality types in your classroom. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Stansbury, P. (1990). Abridged test-retest reliability study for the PPI. Little Rock: Kahler Communications, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Leadership (Emeritus)Central Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA
  2. 2.Department of Educational LeadershipIndiana State University,Terre HauteUSA