Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Pleasure

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_544-1

Abstract

Pleasure is the subjective state, or states, of experienced enjoyment. It can be thought of as the “liking” component of reward, which distinguishes it from the “desire” and “learning” components. Multiple terms are used to differentiate pleasure of various types or intensities; these include liking, delight, and ecstasy. Common sources of pleasure are sexual and other sensual activity, positive social interaction, eating, and engagement with nature and the arts. However, deriving pleasure from a particular stimulus is an interplay between properties of the stimulus and the individual: no stimulus is found to be equally pleasurable by all people. As well as between-individual differences, the pleasurable aspect of a particular stimulus varies in a state-specific way for any given person.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barbano, M., & Cador, M. (2007). Opioids for hedonic experience and dopamine to get ready for it. Psychopharmacology, 191(3), 497–506. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0521-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berridge, K., & Kringelbach, M. (2015). Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron, 86(3), 646–664. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.018.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Berridge, K., & Robinson, T. (2003). Parsing reward. Trends in Neurosciences, 26(9), 507–513.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Duprat, R., De Raedt, R., Wu, G.-R., & Baeken, C. (2016). Intermittent theta burst stimulation increases reward responsiveness in individuals with higher hedonic capacity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 294.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Henderson, L. W., & Knight, T. (2012). Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to more comprehensively understand wellbeing and pathways to wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 196–221. doi: 10.5502/ijw.v2i3.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Olds, J. (1956). Pleasure centers in the brain. Scientific American, 195, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wyvell, C., & Berridge, K. (2000). Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: Enhancement of reward ‘wanting’ without enhanced ‘liking’ or response reinforcement. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20(21), 8122–8130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zacharopoulos, G., Lancaster, T. M., Bracht, T., Ihssen, N., Maio, G. R., & Linden, D. E. J. (2016). A hedonism hub in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex, 26(10), 3921–3927. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of PsychologySouthern Cross UniversityCoffs HarbourAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Monika Wróbel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of PsychologyUniversity of LodzLodzPoland