Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Multidimensional Self-Concept

  • A. Katrin Arens
  • Isabelle Schmidt
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2333-1

Synonyms

Introduction

Self-concept is defined as an individual’s self-perceptions. Contemporary self-concept research and theory assume that individuals establish self-concepts in relation to different domains, making self-concept a multidimensional construct. The multidimensionality of self-concept was formulated in the model by Shavelson et al. (1976) and has been extensively empirically validated in the last decades. Respective findings have led to the development of instruments considering the domain specificity of self-concept and inspired research on the development of a multidimensional self-concept and on group differences in the mean levels of multiple self-concept facets. Multidimensionality primarily reflects the separation of self-concept into domain-specific facets; yet, the conceptualization of multidimensionality might also be used in extended ways addressing an even more fine-grained separation of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arens, A. K., Yeung, A. S., Craven, R. G., & Hasselhorn, M. (2011). The twofold multidimensionality of academic self-concept: Domain specificity and separation between competence and affect components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 970–981.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34, 139–153.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunner, M., Keller, U., Dierendonck, C., Reichert, M., Ugen, S., Fischbach, A., & Martin, R. (2010). The structure of academic self-concepts revisited: The nested Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 964–981.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne, B. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 599–613.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–533.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.519.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Herbert, J., & Stipek, D. (2005). The emergence of gender differences in children's perceptions of their academic competence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 276–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.02.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D. W., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  11. Marsh, H. W. (1989). Age and sex effects in multiple dimensions of self-concept: Preadolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 417–430.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marsh, H. W. (1992). Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 35–42.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.1.35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. L. (1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 567–601. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23093373.Google Scholar
  14. Marsh, H. W., & Ayotte, V. (2003). Do multiple dimensions of self-concept become more differentiated with age? The differential distinctiveness hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 687–706.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marsh, H. W., & Redmayne, R. S. (1994). A multidimensional physical self-concept and its relations to multiple components of physical fitness. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 43–55.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.16.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marsh, H. W., Ellis, L. A., & Craven, R. G. (2002). How do preschool children feel about themselves? Unraveling measurement and multidimensional self-concept structure. Developmental Psychology, 38, 376–393.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.38.3.376.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). A meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1129–1167.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309337522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicholls, J. G. (1979). Development of perception of own attainment and causal attributions for success and failure in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 94–99.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Mara, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., & Debus, R. L. (2006). Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis. Educational Psychologist, 41, 181–206.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pinxten, M., Marsh, H. W., De Fraine, B., Van Den Noortgate, W., & van Damme, J. (2014). Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived math effort expenditure. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 152–174.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruble, D. N., Boggiano, A. K., Feldman, N. S., & Loebl, J. H. (1980). Developmental analysis of the role of social comparison in self-evaluation. Developmental Psychology, 16, 105–115.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.16.2.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046003407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Trautwein, U., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2004). Des einen Freud’, der anderen Leid? Der Beitrag schulischen Problemverhaltens zur Selbstkonzeptentwicklung [One man’s meat is another man’s poison – Psychosocial consequences of adolescents’ problem behavior in school]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18, 15–29.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.18.1.15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., Freedman-Doan, C., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Changes in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A three-year study.  Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yeung, A. S., Chui, H.-S., Lau, I. C.-y., McInerney, D. M., Russell-Bowie, D., & Suliman, R. (2000). Where is the hierarchy of academic self-concept? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 556–567.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DIPF|Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in EducationFrankfurtGermany
  2. 2.University of TrierTrierGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Virgil Zeigler-Hill
    • 1
  1. 1.Oakland UniversityRochesterUSA