Personality and Subjective Well-Being
- 94 Downloads
For psychologists, the most intriguing aspect of well-being is how people subjectively experience quality of their own lives. People react and evaluate external conditions basing on their expectations, values, beliefs, and previous experiences, and thus the subjective element is essential for life’s quality. Subjective well-being (SWB) is a complex construct defined as “a person’s cognitive and affective evaluations of his or her life” (Diener et al. 2002, p. 63). Therefore, SWB (labeled also as happiness) is described as a combination of global judgment of life satisfaction and the relative frequency of experiencing positive versus negative affect (Diener et al. 1991). A happy person has a high level of satisfaction with life and experiences a greater positive affect and little negative affect.
Subjective Well-Being: Conceptualization and Measurement
SWB is usually assessed with self-report questionnaires. A number of tools have been developed to measure separable...
- Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO-personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., & Lucas, R. (1999). Personality and subjective well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., Sandvik, E., & Pavot, W. (1991). Happiness is the frequency, not the intensity, of positive versus negative affect. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 119–139). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
- Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for personality. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series, 39. Springer: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
- Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Watson, D. (2000). Mood and temperament. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar