Skip to main content

Fairness

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Synonyms

Deservingness; Distributive justice; Equality; Equity; Justice; Justice sensitivity; Morality; Need; Procedural justice

Introduction

Judgments of fairness, justice, and morality are omnipresent in people’s lives. People value being treated fairly and to get respect from important figures, for instance, in-group members or societal authorities (Lind and Tyler 1998). Moreover, unjust situations can evoke intense emotions, such as moral outrage, both when these situations are personally experienced and also when they are merely witnessed (Lerner 1980). That is why a great wealth of research is concerned with issues of social justice, fairness, and morality in the field of social psychology. In the current contribution, we discuss individual differences in fairness judgments and propose a taxonomy of important antecedents of these judgments.

Individual Differences in Fairness Judgments

Even though the concern for fairness seems to be a universal value (see, e.g., Lerner 1980),...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bal, M., & Van den Bos, K. (2012). Blaming for a better future: Future orientation and associated intolerance of personal uncertainty lead to harsher reactions toward innocent victims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 835–844.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, N. J. (2000). But it’s not fair! Commonsense notions of unfairness. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 898–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., & Maes, J. (2010). The justice sensitivity inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data. Social Justice Research, 23, 211–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2005). Justice for all, or just for me? More evidence of the importance of the self-other distinction in just-world beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 637–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèlle Bal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bal, M., van den Bos, K. (2017). Fairness. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2096-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2096-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics