Spontaneity is defined as “an appropriate response to a situation or a new response to an old situation” (Moreno 1953 cited in Kipper and Hundal 2005, p. 120). Spontaneity is also viewed as a theory that is claimed as the bedrock of psychodrama – “a method of clinical intervention and group therapy” (Moreno 1941, 1953, 1964 cited in Kipper 2000, p. 33). On the other hand, spontaneity is also seen as a way of life or philosophy (Kipper and Hundal 2005). This two-pronged perspective on spontaneity is detailed as follows: “as a philosophy, the idea of a spontaneous person reflected a way of living and a general outlook on life that valued taking advantage of living ‘in the moment’” (Kipper and Hundal 2005, p. 119). As a therapeutic agent, spontaneity was said to be a specific curative factor believed to increase openness, reduce inhibitions, and enhance one’s psychological well-being...
- Collins, L. A., Kumar, V. K., Treadwell, T. W., & Leach, E. (1997). The personal attitude scale: A scale to measure spontaneity. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 49(4), 147–156.Google Scholar
- Kellar, H., Treadwell, T., Kumar, V. K., & Leach, E. (2002). The personal attitude scale-II: A revised measure of spontaneity. The International Journal of Action Methods: Psychodrama, Skill Training, and Role Playing, 55, 35–46.Google Scholar
- Kipper, D. (2000). Spontaneity: Does the experience match the theory? The International Journal of Action Methods, 53, 33–47.Google Scholar