Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Feedback Loops

  • Alexandra, Sophia MalinowskiEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1795-1

Definition

Feedback refers to an event whereby outputs from one system are fed into a coupled system as inputs, increasing or decreasing subsequent effects and forming a continuous circuit. Often, feedback and self-correction leads to varying adjustments resulting in differences between actual output and desired output, ultimately increasing the change to a given system or reducing change reverting the system to normal functioning (Carver and Scheier 1982).

Introduction

Though traditionally applied to cybernetics, feedback loops are a useful tool in the conceptualization and analysis of human behavior through self-regulation, as explained by Carver and Scheier using control theory (Carver and Scheier 1982).

Types

Positive Feedback

There are two types of feedback: positive feedback and negative feedback. The positive classification refers to accelerating or increasing a process rather than the desirability of the outcome. In a positive feedback loop: A produces more of B which in turn...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. J. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, J. D. W. (1989). Psychotherapy of depression: A self-confirmation model. Psychological Review, 96(4), 576–607.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.576.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Ruiter, N. M. P., Van Geert, P. L. C., & Kunnen, E. S. (2017). Explaining the “how” of self-esteem development: The self-organizing self-esteem model. Review of General Psychology, 21(1), 49–68.  https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drummond, P. D., Camacho, L., Formentin, N., Heffernan, T. D., Williams, F., & Zekas, T. E. (2003). The impact of verbal feedback about blushing on social discomfort and facial blood flow during embarrassing tasks. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(4), 413–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00021-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lowrey, P. L., & Takahashi, J. S. (2004). Mammalian circadian biology: Elucidating genome-wide levels of temporal organization. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 5(1), 407–441.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.5.061903.175925.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Stapelberg, N. J. C., Pratt, R., Neumann, D. L., Shum, D. H. K., Brandis, S., Muthukkumarasamy, V., et al. (2018). From feedback loop transitions to biomarkers in the psycho-immune-neuroendocrine network: Detecting the critical transition from health to major depression. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 90, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Catherine Cottrell
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Social SciencesNew College of FloridaSarasotaUSA