Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Living Edition
| Editors: Virgil Zeigler-Hill, Todd K. Shackelford

Sexual Selection

  • Justin D. Durham
  • Robert D. Mather
  • Steven M. DunnEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1573-1

Synonyms

Definition

A primary component of natural selection in which human and nonhuman animals compete for potential mates within the same sex and species, in relation to reproductive success, by means of female choice and male competition.

Overview

Sexual selection and the evolution of human mating behaviors may serve a function of the large individual differences in biology, motivation, cognition, and personality traits (e.g., Big 5) in any given population. Because sexual selection is a primary factor in human evolution, it should have a significant impact on the success of a species in natural selection for specific differences among individual and group selection for mates with personality and individual traits selected for by the opposite sex.

Introduction

Human sexual behavior and human sex differences have been studied from various approaches and, recently, have been studied from an evolutionary psychology framework (Geary et al. 2004)....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andersson, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2006). Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apostolou, M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: The role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(6), 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3–4), 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgia, G. (2006). Preexisting male traits are important in the evolution of elaborated male sexual display. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 36, 249–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (1984). Evolutionary biology and personality psychology: Toward a conception of human nature and individual differences. American Psychologist, 39(10), 1135–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, D. M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 42(1), 459–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M. (1998). The psychology of human mate selection: Exploring the complexity of the strategic repertoire. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 405–429). Mahwah: Lawerence Erbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2006). The evolution of aggression. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 263–285). Madison: Psychosocial Press.Google Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M., & Penke, L. (2015). Evolutionary personality psychology. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 3–29). Washington, DC: APA Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Human aggression in evolutionary psychological perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 17(6), 605–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, B. (1972). Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Cronin, H. (1991). The ant and the peacock. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (Vol. 1 & 2). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  14. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: APA Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geary, D. C., Vigil, J., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2004). Evolution of human mate choice. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gersick, A., & Kurzban, R. (2014). Covert sexual signaling: Human flirtation and implications for other social species. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(3), 549–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mather, R. D. (2007). Toward a unified social psychology: The integrative social paradigm. Journal of Scientific Psychology, 8–13.Google Scholar
  21. Mather, R. D. (2015). Planetary altruist brother, can you spare a dime? Cash or check is fine. PsycCRITIQUES, 60(40).Google Scholar
  22. Miller, G. F. (1998). How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 87–129). Mahwah: Lawerence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, G. F. (2011). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  24. Miller, G. F., & Todd, P. M. (1998). Mate choice turns cognitive. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(5), 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nettle, D. (2005). An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nettle, D. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61(6), 622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruse, M. (2015). Sexual selection: Why does it play such a large role in The Descent of Man? In T. Hoquet (Ed.), Current perspectives on sexual selection: What’s left after Darwin? (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., Von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2008). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shan, W., Shenghua, J., Davis, H. M., Peng, K., Shao, X., Wu, Y., … Qiao, M. (2012). Mating strategies in Chinese culture: Female risk avoiding vs. male risk taking. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(3), 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Zhou, C., Wang, X. L., Zheng, W. J., Zhou, X. D., Li, L., & Hesketh, T. (2012). The high sex ratio in China: What do the Chinese think? Journal of Biosocial Science, 44(1), 121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhu, W. X., Lu, L., & Hesketh, T. (2009). China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child policy: Analysis of data from 2005 national intercensus survey. BMJ, 338, b1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justin D. Durham
    • 1
  • Robert D. Mather
    • 1
  • Steven M. Dunn
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.University of Central OklahomaEdmondUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Jon Sefcek
    • 1
  1. 1.Kent State UniversityKentUSA