A primary component of natural selection in which human and nonhuman animals compete for potential mates within the same sex and species, in relation to reproductive success, by means of female choice and male competition.
Sexual selection and the evolution of human mating behaviors may serve a function of the large individual differences in biology, motivation, cognition, and personality traits (e.g., Big 5) in any given population. Because sexual selection is a primary factor in human evolution, it should have a significant impact on the success of a species in natural selection for specific differences among individual and group selection for mates with personality and individual traits selected for by the opposite sex.
Human sexual behavior and human sex differences have been studied from various approaches and, recently, have been studied from an evolutionary psychology framework (Geary et al. 2004)....
- Buss, D. M. (1998). The psychology of human mate selection: Exploring the complexity of the strategic repertoire. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 405–429). Mahwah: Lawerence Erbaum.Google Scholar
- Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2006). The evolution of aggression. In M. Schaller, J. A. Simpson, & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 263–285). Madison: Psychosocial Press.Google Scholar
- Buss, D. M., & Penke, L. (2015). Evolutionary personality psychology. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 4: Personality processes and individual differences (pp. 3–29). Washington, DC: APA Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Campbell, B. (1972). Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
- Cronin, H. (1991). The ant and the peacock. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (Vol. 1 & 2). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
- Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. (1989). Human ethology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Mather, R. D. (2007). Toward a unified social psychology: The integrative social paradigm. Journal of Scientific Psychology, 8–13.Google Scholar
- Mather, R. D. (2015). Planetary altruist brother, can you spare a dime? Cash or check is fine. PsycCRITIQUES, 60(40).Google Scholar
- Miller, G. F. (1998). How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In C. Crawford & D. L. Krebs (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 87–129). Mahwah: Lawerence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Miller, G. F. (2011). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
- Ruse, M. (2015). Sexual selection: Why does it play such a large role in The Descent of Man? In T. Hoquet (Ed.), Current perspectives on sexual selection: What’s left after Darwin? (pp. 3–17). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar