Skip to main content

Consensual Validation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences

Consensual Validation

People vary in their beliefs and attitudes about a variety of issues, ranging from the existence of God to whether transgender people should be allowed to go into public bathrooms that align with their gender identity (a topic that was in the media when we wrote this entry). People also have beliefs about themselves, which can be very holistic (I am a person of worth) to very specific (I have nice eyes). Regardless of the unique beliefs they hold, people want theirs validated; that is, they want to believe their beliefs are the correct ones. For most beliefs, people have no objective, external criteria to determine their correctness or superiority. Instead, people make social comparisons with others. The social comparison process is not unbiased, however. People strategically seek validation of their beliefs through consensus with others (i.e., consensual validation). It is more affectively rewarding to learn that friends, family, and potential acquaintances have...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berzoff, J. (2015). H. S. Sullivan and his contribution to the relational school. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 85, 54–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blitsten, D. R. (1953). The social theories of Harry Stack Sullivan. New York: William-Frederick Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., & Clore, G. L. (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An International Journal, 1, 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A. H. (1976). Harry Stack Sullivan: His life and his work. New York: Putnam Adult.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental interference and romantic love: The Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Levine, J. M. (2009). Shared reality experiencing commonality with others’ inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 496–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Gerard, H. B., Hymovitch, B., Kelley, H. H., & Raven, B. (1952). The influence process in the presence of extreme deviates. Human Relations, 5, 327–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 634–650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hochbaum, G. M. (1953). Certain personality aspects and pressures to uniformity in social group. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., Adelman, J. R., & Blagg, R. D. (2010). Religion in the face of uncertainty: An uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 72–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, J. (2009). A summary of the primary causes of the housing bubble and the resulting credit crisis: A non-technical paper. The Journal of Business Inquiry, 8, 120–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2004). On the importance of cognitive evaluation as a determinant of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 696–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 64–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullahy, P. (1970). Psychoanalysis and interpersonal psychiatry: The contributions of Harry Stack Sullivan. New York: Spence House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, B. A., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Motivations for group membership: The role of subjective importance and uncertainty reduction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Silton, N. R., Flannelly, K. J., Ellison, C. G., Galek, K., Jacobs, M. R., Marcum, J. P., & Silton, F. J. (2011). The association between religious beliefs and practices and end-of-life fears among members of the Presbyterian church (USA). Review of Religious Research, 53, 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, H. C., Hood, K. B., & Wright, B. L. (2014). Revisiting the Romeo and Juliet effect: Reexamining the links between social network opinions and romantic relationship outcomes. Social Psychology, 45, 170–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1981). Seek, and ye shall find: Testing hypotheses about other people. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 277–303). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The influence of parents and friends on the quality and stability of romantic relationships: A three-wave longitudinal investigation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 888–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprecher, S., Treger, S., Hilaire, N., Fisher, A., & Hatfield, E. (2013). You validate me, you like me, you’re fun, you expand me: “I’m yours!”. Current Research in Social Psychology, 22, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1964). The fusion of psychiatry and social science. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, W. B., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2012). Self as functional fiction. Social Cognition, 30, 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1971). Developmental changes in sources of consensual validation in preadolescence. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 15, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, G. (1952). Groupthink. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam J. Hampton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hampton, A.J., Sprecher, S. (2017). Consensual Validation. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1287-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1287-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics