The Sixteen-Factor Model of Personality
Definition
The sixteen-factor model of personality represents a unique and momentous chapter in the history of personality research. Emerging out of the lexical tradition and factor analytic studies, the sixteen-factor model was the first scientifically derived personality taxonomy (Tucker 2009). The sixteen-factor model of personality provided researchers with a taxonomy to describe, understand, and study personality at a time when no adequate taxonomy of personality characteristics was available (John 1990). Moreover, the sixteen-factor model stimulated new thinking and generated a vast quantity of research in contemporary personality psychology (Ryckman 2012). Furthermore, this model introduced the quantitative approach to the study of personality, which paved the way for the development of later trait models such as the five-factor model of personality (Matz et al. 2016).
Introduction
Despite its revolutionary impact, the sixteen-factor model was subjected to many criticisms and as...
References
- Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i-171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Arnold, M. (1997). The importance of personality in the performance of diagnostic radiographers. Radiography, 3(2), 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barrett, P., & Kline, P. (1982). An item and radial parcel factor analysis of the 16PF Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barton, K., & Dreger, R. M. (1986). Prediction of marital roles from normal and pathological dimensions of personality: 16PF and MMPI. Psychological Reports, 59(2 Pt 1), 459–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barton, K., Dielman, T. E., & Cattell, R. B. (1971). The prediction of school grades from personality and IQ measures. Personality, 2, 325–333.Google Scholar
- Ben-Porath, Y. S. (1990). Cross-cultural assessment of personality: The case for replicatory factor analysis. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 8, pp. 27–48). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bernardin, H. J. (1977). The relationship of personality variables to organizational withdrawal. Personnel Psychology, 30(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boyle, G. (1989). Re-examination of the major personality-type factors in the Cattell, Comrey and Eysenck scales: Were the factor solutions by Noller et al. optimal? Personality and Individual Differences, 10(12), 1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(4), 476–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, R. B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 58(1), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, R. B. (1947). Confirmation and clarification of primary personality factors. Psychometrika, 12(3), 197–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, R. B. (1948). The primary personality factors in women compared with those in men. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1(2), 114–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, H. E. (2001). The sixteen personality factor (16PF) questionnaire. In W. I. Dorfman & M. Hersen (Eds.), Perspectives on individual differences: Understanding psychological assessment (pp. 187–218). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, H. E. (2004). The sixteen personality factor (16PF) Questionnaire. In M. J. Hilsenroth & D. L. Segal (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Personality assessment (Vol. 2). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cattell, H. E., & Mead, A. D. (2008). The sixteen personality factor questionnaire (16PF). In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Personality measurement and testing (Vol. 2, pp. 135–159). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, R. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1967). Likeness and completeness theories examined by sixteen personality factor measures on stably and unstably married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(4), 351–361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, H. E., & Schuerger, J. M. (2003). Essentials of 16PF assessment (Eds: Kaufman, A. S. & Kaufman, N. L.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cattell, R. B., & Warburton, F. W. (1961). A cross-cultural comparison of patterns of extraversion and anxiety. British Journal of Psychology, 52(1), 3–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cattell, R. B., Pichot, P., & Rennes, P. (1961). Constance interculturelle des facteurs de personnalite mesures par le test 16PF. II. Comparaison fraoco-americaine. Revue de Psychotogie Apptiquee, 11, 165–196.Google Scholar
- Cattell, R. B., Schmidt, L. R., & Pawlik, K. (1973). Cross cultural comparison (U.S.A, Japan, Austria) of the personality factor structures of 10 to 14 year olds in objective tests. Social Behavior and Personality, 1(2), 182–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2016). Personality: Theory and research (13th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Conn, S. R., & Rieke, M. L. (1994). The 16PF fifth edition technical manual. Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc.Google Scholar
- Csoka, L. S. (1993). Psychological profiles for predicting leader performance. Human Resource Management Review, 3(4), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DeLamatre, J., & Schuerger, J. (1992). Personality disorder concept scales and 16PF dimensions. Psychological Reports, 70(3), 839–849.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Digman, J. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Digman, J. M. (1996). The curious history of the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–20). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Eicke, F. J., Blake, G., & Replogle, W. (1993). A comparative view of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Family Medicine, 25(3), 186–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: 16, 5 or 3?-Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(8), 773–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ferrer, L., & Kirchner, T. (2015). Suicidal tendency among adolescents with adjustment disorder: Risk and protective personality factors. Crisis: The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention, 36(3), 202–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Golden, C. J. (1978). Cross-cultural second order factor structures of the 16PF. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42(2), 167–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hergenhahn, B., & Olson, M. H. (2007). An introduction to theories of personality (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Hetland, H., & Sandal, G. M. (2003). Transformational leadership in Norway: Outcomes and personality correlates. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12(2), 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hewstone, M., Fincham, F. D., & Foster, J. (2005). Psychology. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Holland, J. L. (1960). The prediction of college grades from personality and aptitude variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Howarth, E. (1976). Were Cattell’s ‘personality sphere’ factors correctly identified in the first instance? British Journal of Psychology, 67(2), 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- John, O. P. (1990). The search for the basic dimensions of personality: Review and critique. In P. McReynolds, J. C. Rosen, & G. J. Chelune (Eds.), Advances in psychological assessment (Vol. 7). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114–158). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Jones, W. P. (1976). Some implications of the sixteen personality factor questionnaire for marital guidance. Family Coordinator, 25(2), 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jones, H. L., Sasek, J., & Wakefield, J. A. (1976). Maslow’s need hierarchy and Cattell’s 16PF. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 74–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karol, D., & Russell, M. (1995). Summary of recent research: 16PF 5th edition questionnaire and relationship adjustment. In M. Russell (Ed.), The 16PF fifth edition couple’s counseling report user’s guide (pp. 23–49). Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
- Karson, S., & Pool, K. B. (1957). The construct validity of the sixteen personality factors test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 13(3), 245–252.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krug, S. E., & Johns, E. F. (1986). A large scale cross-validation of second-order personality structure defined by the 16PF. Psychological Reports, 59, 683–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liebert, R. M., & Spiegler, M. D. (1970). Personality: An introduction to theory and research. Homewood: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
- Lounsbury, J., Park, S. H., Sundstrom, E., Williamson, J. M., & Pemberton, A. E. (2004). Personality, career satisfaction, and life satisfaction: Test of a directional model. Journal of Career Assessment, 12(4), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Love, K. G., & DeArmond, S. (2007). The validity of assessment center ratings and 16PF personality trait scores in police sergeant promotions: A case of incremental validity. Public Personnel Management, 36(1), 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Low, J. M., Williamson, D., & Cottingham, J. (2004). Predictors of university student lawbreaking behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Matz, S., Chan, Y. W., & Kosinski, M. (2016). Models of personality. In M. Tkalcic, B. D. Carolis, M. de Gemmis, A. Odic, & A. Kosir (Eds.), Emotions and personality in personalized services: Models, evaluations and applications (pp. 35–56). Switzerland: Springer International Publishings.Google Scholar
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1985). Updating Norman’s ‘adequacy taxonomy’: Intelligence and personality dimensions in natural language and in questionnaires. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 710–721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 175–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Noller, P., Law, H., & Comrey, A. L. (1987). Cattell, Comrey, and Eysenck personality factors compared: More evidence for the five robust factors? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Philip, A. E. (1972). Cross-cultural stability of second-order factors in the 16PF. The British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11(3), 276–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rivera, H. (1996). Critique of 16PF. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED401304).Google Scholar
- Rossier, J., Meyer de Stadelhofen, F., & Berthoud, S. (2004). The hierarchical structures of the NEO PI-R and the 16PF 5. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Russell, M. T. (1995). The 16PF couple’s counseling report user’s guide. Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
- Ryckman, R. M. (2012). Theories of personality (10th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Schuerger, J. M. (1992). The sixteen personality factor questionnaire and its junior versions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71(2), 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schuerger, J. M., & Watterson, D. G. (1998). Occupational interpretation of the 16PF questionnaire. Cleveland: Watterson and Associates.Google Scholar
- Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2005). Theories of personality (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning Inc.Google Scholar
- Shergill, H. K. (2010). Psychology-part 1. New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.Google Scholar
- Strack, K. M., Dunaway, M. H., & Schulenberg, S. E. (2008). On the multicultural utility of the 16PF and the CPI-434 in the United States. In L. A. Suzuki & J. G. Ponterotto (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment: Clinical, psychological, and educational applications (3rd ed., pp. 375–401). San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Tango, R. A., & Kolodinsky, P. (2004). Investigation of placement outcomes 3 years after a job skills training program for chronically unemployed adults. Journal of Employment Counseling, 41(2), 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tsujioka, B., & Cattell, R. B. (1965). A cross-cultural comparison of second-stratum questionnaire personality factor structures – Anxiety and extraversion – In America and Japan. The Journal of Social Psychology, 65, 205–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tucker, W. H. (2009). The Cattell controversy: Race, science, and ideology. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
- Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 225–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vaughan, G. M., & Cattell, R. B. (1976). Personality differences between young New Zealanders and Americans. The Journal of Social Psychology, 99(1), 3–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2003). The effect of group counseling on improvement of self-confidence of college students. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17(4), 235–239.Google Scholar
- Weiner, I. B., & Craighead, W. E. (Eds.). (2010). The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 4, 4th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Williams, J. D., Dudley, H. K., & Overall, J. E. (1972). Validity of the 16PF and the MMPI in a mental hospital setting. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 80(3), 261–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar