Encyclopedia of GIS

Living Edition
| Editors: Shashi Shekhar, Hui Xiong, Xun Zhou

Indoor Wayfinding Tools

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_1622-1

Synonyms

Historical Background

Indoor wayfinding tools have been in use for a very long time. In fact, there is a very good chance that you are reading this entry in a building that employs the most basic tool: a systematic use of room numbers. Room numbers alone can already encode useful information as of where a specific room is located in a building.

Imagine a hotel where rooms 100–135 are located on the first floor, rooms 200–233 on the second floor, and so on. Such systematic use of room numbers allows for restricting the search space for a specific room to a single floor without knowing anything else about the hotel. If, upon exiting the lift at the respective floor, there are also signs telling in which direction to head for each room, for example, “100–116 to the left and 117–135 to the right”; then this implements a fully functional wayfinding tool for finding rooms in this hotel using only a very few simple measures. Airports work...

Keywords

Global Position System Global Navigation Satellite System Global Navigation Satellite System Path Planning Indoor Localization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arthur P, Passini R (1992) Wayfinding: people, signs, and architecture. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  2. Baus J, Krüger A, Wahlster W (2002) A resource-adaptive mobile navigation system. In: IUI ’02: proceedings of the 7th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. ACM, New York, pp 15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerovsek T (2011) A review and outlook for a ‘Building Information Model’ (BIM): a multi-standpoint framework for technological development. Adv Eng Inf 25(2):224–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cuayáhuitl H, Dethlefs N, Richter KF, Tenbrink T, Bateman J (2010) A dialogue system for indoor way-finding using text-based natural language. Int J Comput Linguist Appl 1(1-2):285–304Google Scholar
  5. de Laat R, van Berlo L (2011) Integration of BIM and GIS: the development of the CityGML GeoBIM extension. In: Kolbe TH, König G, Nagel C (eds) Advances in 3D geo-information sciences. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 211–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghafourian M, Karimi HA (2009) Universal navigation: concept and algorithms. In: World congress on computer science and information engineering, IEEE computer society, Los Alamitos, vol 2, pp 369–373. doi: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/CSIE.2009.959
  7. Gröger G, Kolbe TH, Nagel C, Häfele KH (2012) OGC city geography markup language (CityGML) encoding standard. OGC 12-019, Open Geospatial ConsortiumGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirtle SC, Sorrows ME (1998) Designing a multi-modal tool for locating buildings on a college campus. J Environ Psychol 18(3):265–276. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0096
  9. Kim JS, Yoo SJ, Li KJ (2014) Integrating IndoorGML and CityGML for indoor space. In: Pfoser D, Li KJ (eds) Web and wireless geographical information systems. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8470. Springer, Berlin, pp 184–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klippel A, Freksa C, Winter S (2006) You-are-here maps in emergencies – the danger of getting lost. J Spat Sci 51(1):117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kolodziej KW, Hjelm J (2006) Local positioning systems – LBS applications and services. Taylor & Francis, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kray C, Kortuem G, Krüger A (2005) Adaptive navigation support with public displays. In: IUI ’05: proceedings of the 10th international conference on intelligent user interfaces. ACM, New York, pp 326–328. doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1040830.1040916
  13. Kray C, Fritze H, Fechner T, Schwering A, Li R, Anacta V (2013) Transitional spaces: between indoor and outdoor spaces. In: Tenbrink T, Stell J, Galton A, Wood Z (eds) Spatial information theory. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 8116. Springer, Berlin, pp 14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krüger A, Baus J, Heckmann D, Kruppa M, Wasinger R (2007) Adaptive mobile guides. In: Brusilovsky P, Kobsa A, Nejdl W (eds) The adaptive Web. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4321. Springer, Berlin, pp 521–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levine M (1982) You-are-here maps – psychological considerations. Environ Behav 14(2):221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ohlbach HJ, Stoffel EP (2008) Versatile route descriptions for pedestrian guidance in buildings – conceptual model and systematic method. In: Proceedings of11th AGILE international conference on geographic information science, Gerona, University of GeronaGoogle Scholar
  17. Petrenko A, Sizo A, Qian W, Knowles AD, Tavassolian A, Stanley K, Bell S (2014) Exploring mobility indoors: an application of sensor-based and GIS systems. Trans GIS 18(3):351–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Richter KF, Winter S, Santosa S (2011) Hierarchical representations of indoor spaces. Environ Plan B Plan Design 38(6):1052–1070. http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=b37057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van de Ven J, Dylla F (2013) The spatial interaction laboratory – a distributed middleware and qualitative representation for ambient intelligence. In: Space, time, and ambient intelligence: proceedings from the AAAI workshop, BellevueGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of Zurich – IrchelZurichSwitzerland