Encyclopedia of GIS

Living Edition
| Editors: Shashi Shekhar, Hui Xiong, Xun Zhou

Spatiotemporal Change Footprint Pattern Discovery

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_1512-1

Synonyms

Definition

Given a definition of change and a dataset about spatiotemporal (ST) phenomena, ST change footprint discovery is the process of identifying the location and/or time of such changes from the dataset. As shown in Fig.  1, there are four main components of a change footprint pattern discovery process: ST data from an application is the input of the problem. A definition of a change pattern is given based on the underlying application. Finally, a method (e.g., statistical, computational) that discovers the pattern from the data will produce the ST footprints as output.

Keywords

Land Cover Change Change Pattern Change Point Detection Change Vector Analysis Interest Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aach T, Kaup A (1995) Bayesian algorithms for adaptive change detection in image sequences using markov random fields. Signal Process Image Commun 7(2):147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aach T, Kaup A, Mester R (1993) Statistical model-based change detection in moving video. Signal Process 31(2):165–180CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronov B, Driemel A, Kreveld MV, Löffler M, Staals F (2015) Segmentation of trajectories on nonmonotone criteria. ACM Trans Algorithms (TALG) 12(2):26MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry D, Hartigan J (1993) A bayesian analysis for change point problems. J Am Stat Assoc 88:309–319MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Basseville M, Nikiforov IV et al (1993) Detection of abrupt changes: theory and application, vol 104. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  6. Berman, M. L. and GIS, C. H. (2003). A data model for historical gis: The chgis time series. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Yenching Institute Technical Report. Google Scholar
  7. Bruzzone L, Prieto DF (2002) An adaptive semiparametric and context-based approach to unsupervised change detection in multitemporal remote-sensing images. IEEE Trans Image Proces 11(4):452–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen J, Gupta AK (2001) On change point detection and estimation. Commun Stat Simul Comput 30(3):665–697MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen G, Hay GJ, Carvalho LM, Wulder MA (2012) Object-based change detection. Int J Remote Sens 33(14):4434–4457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coppin P, Jonckheere I, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Lambin E (2004) Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int J Remote Sens 25(9):1565–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglas DH, Peucker TK (1973) Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitized line or its caricature. Cartograph Int J Geograph Inf Geovis 10(2):112–122Google Scholar
  12. Fagan W, Fortin M, Soykan C (2003) Integrating edge detection and dynamic modeling in quantitative analyses of ecological boundaries. BioScience 53(8):730–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabriel E, Allard D (2008) Evaluating the sampling pattern when detecting zones of abrupt change. Environ Ecol Stat 15(4):469–489MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ge Y, Xiong H, Zhou Z-h, Ozdemir H, Yu J, Lee KC (2010) Top-eye: Top-k evolving trajectory outlier detection. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, Toronto. ACM, pp 1733–1736Google Scholar
  15. Gustafsson F, Gustafsson F (2000) Adaptive filtering and change detection, vol 1. Wiley, LondresMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Im J, Jensen J (2005) A change detection model based on neighborhood correlation image analysis and decision tree classification. Remote Sens Environ 99(3):326–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keogh E, Chu S, Hart D, Pazzani M (2001) An online algorithm for segmenting time series. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM 2001), San Jose. IEEE, pp 289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kulldorff M (1997) A spatial scan statistic. Commun Stat Theory Methods 26(6):1481–1496 (Xc912 Times Cited:716 Cited References Count:22)Google Scholar
  19. Lee J-G, Han J, Li X (2008) Trajectory outlier detection: a partition-and-detect framework. In: IEEE 24th International Conference on Data engineering (ICDE 2008), Toronto, Cancun, Mexico. IEEE, pp 140–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lu H, Carlin B (2005) Bayesian areal wombling for geographical boundary analysis. Geograph Anal 37(3):265–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu D, Mausel P, Brondizio E, Moran E (2004) Change detection techniques. Int J Remote Sens 25(12):2365–2401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lunetta RS, Elvidge CD et al (1999) Remote sensing change detection: environmental monitoring methods and applications. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Neill D, Moore A (2004) Rapid detection of significant spatial clusters. ACM, ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Neill D, Moore A, Sabhnani M, Daniel K (2005) Detection of emerging space-time clusters. ACM, ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Page ES (1954) Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 41(1/2):100–115MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Radke R, Andra S, Al-Kofahi O, Roysam B (2005) Image change detection algorithms: a systematic survey. IEEE Trans Image Process 14(3):294–307MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Remote Sensing and Geospatial Analysis Laboratory (2013) University of Minnesota. Twin cities metro area impervious surface data 1998 and 2002Google Scholar
  28. University of Nebraska-Lincoln (2011) Historical GIS: the 1840-1845-1850-1861-1870 railroad system in America, State and National shapefiles. http://railroads.unl.edu/resources/
  29. Womble W (1951) Differential systematics. Science 114(2961):315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wong W, Neill D (2009) Tutorial on event detection. Presentation in ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. http://www.pptsearch.net/download.php?fid=109746 Google Scholar
  31. Zhou X, Shekhar S, Mohan P, Liess S, Snyder PK (2011) Discovering interesting sub-paths in spatiotemporal datasets: a summary of results. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems, Chicago, IL, USA. ACM, pp 44–53Google Scholar
  32. Zhou X, Shekhar S, Ali RY (2014) Spatiotemporal change footprint pattern discovery: an inter-disciplinary survey. Wiley Int Rev Data Mining Knowl Discov 4(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management SciencesUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA