Advertisement

Mechanical Regulation of Microvascular Growth and Remodeling

  • Laxminarayanan Krishnan
  • Steven A. LaBelle
  • Marissa A. Ruehle
  • Jeffrey A. Weiss
  • James B. Hoying
  • Robert E. GuldbergEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 216 Downloads
Part of the Reference Series in Biomedical Engineering book series (RSBE)

Abstract

Microvascular growth and remodeling processes are essential to tissue maintenance and repair. While several biochemical regulators have been elucidated, the effects of dynamic mechanical regulatory factors, including local tissue deformation, extracellular matrix mechanical properties, and both luminal and abluminal flow, are incompletely understood. Mechanical regulation is particularly relevant to the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent experimental evidence suggests that microvessels are highly sensitive to changes in local tissue properties like stiffness, ECM density, and external loading. However, an integrated understanding of how microvascular networks are regulated by mechanical factors has not been fully established. In this review, we discuss the microvascular responses to mechanical factors first in terms of cell-based responses and then describe the nuances of these responses when integrated into a multicellular microvessel structure. Finally, we consider the progress in computational modeling approaches to study angiogenesis, wherein the integration of multiple synergistic, antagonistic, or competing stimuli driving the process of microvascular growth and remodeling can be studied, providing better control over experimentally inaccessible variables. By creating a loop wherein experimental data informs computational experiments and vice versa, mechanical effects on microvasculature can be more fully understood and leveraged for engineered tissues.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the US Department of Defense (DoD) through the Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine (AFIRM) grant W81XWH-14-2-0003 to RG; NIH R01-AR069297 to RG, LK, JW; and R01-HL131856 to JW, JH.

Supplementary material

Video 1

Time-lapse of neovessels (red) growing from parent microvessels over six days in 3D collagen (green fibrils) showing the dynamic neovessel growth behavior, including inosculation between neovessels, and collagen fibril remodeling. (Adapted from Utzinger et al. 2015). (WMV 3300 kb)

References

  1. Adams RH, Eichmann A (2010) Axon guidance molecules in vascular patterning. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a001875.  https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson AR, Chaplain MA (1998) Continuous and discrete mathematical models of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Bull Math Biol 60:857–899.  https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.1998.0042CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Atala A, Kasper FK, Mikos AG (2012) Engineering complex tissues. Sci Transl Med 4:160rv112.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3004890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ausprunk DH, Folkman J (1977) Migration and proliferation of endothelial cells in preformed and newly formed blood vessels during tumor angiogenesis. Microvasc Res 14:53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Awolesi MA, Sessa WC, Sumpio BE (1995) Cyclic strain upregulates nitric oxide synthase in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 96:1449–1454.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI118181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauer AL, Jackson TL, Jiang Y (2007) A cell-based model exhibiting branching and anastomosis during tumor-induced angiogenesis. Biophys J 92:3105–3121.  https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.101501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bauer AL, Jackson TL, Jiang Y (2009) Topography of extracellular matrix mediates vascular morphogenesis and migration speeds in angiogenesis. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000445.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000445MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bauer AL, Jackson TL, Jiang Y, Rohlf T (2010) Receptor cross-talk in angiogenesis: mapping environmental cues to cell phenotype using a stochastic, Boolean signaling network model. J Theor Biol 264:838–846.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.03.025CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Bentley K, Gerhardt H, Bates PA (2008) Agent-based simulation of notch-mediated tip cell selection in angiogenic sprout initialisation. J Theor Biol 250:25–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergers G, Song S (2005) The role of pericytes in blood-vessel formation and maintenance. Neuro-Oncology 7:452–464.  https://doi.org/10.1215/S1152851705000232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bergmann CE et al (2006) Arteriogenesis depends on circulating monocytes and macrophage accumulation and is severely depressed in op/op mice. J Leukoc Biol 80:59–65.  https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0206087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boerckel JD, Uhrig BA, Willett NJ, Huebsch N, Guldberg RE (2011) Mechanical regulation of vascular growth and tissue regeneration in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:E674–E680.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1107019108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bookholt FD, Monsuur HN, Gibbs S, Vermolen FJ (2016) Mathematical modelling of angiogenesis using continuous cell-based models. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 15:1577–1600.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-016-0784-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bordeleau F et al (2017) Matrix stiffening promotes a tumor vasculature phenotype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:492–497.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613855114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burton AC (1954) Relation of structure to function of the tissues of the wall of blood vessels. Physiol Rev 34:619–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buschmann I et al (2010) Pulsatile shear and Gja5 modulate arterial identity and remodeling events during flow-driven arteriogenesis. Development 137:2187–2196.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.045351. 137/13/2187 [pii]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caille N, Tardy Y, Meister JJ (1998) Assessment of strain field in endothelial cells subjected to uniaxial deformation of their substrate. Ann Biomed Eng 26:409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Califano JP, Reinhart-King CA (2008) A balance of substrate mechanics and matrix chemistry regulates endothelial cell network assembly. Cell Mol Bioeng 1:122.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-008-0022-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carmeliet P, Jain RK (2011) Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473:298–307.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carosi JA, Eskin SG, McIntire LV (1992) Cyclical strain effects on production of vasoactive materials in cultured endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 151:29–36.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041510106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ceccarelli J, Cheng A, Putnam AJ (2012) Mechanical strain controls endothelial patterning during angiogenic sprouting. Cell Mol Bioeng 5:463–473.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-012-0242-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chambers RC, Leoni P, Kaminski N, Laurent GJ, Heller RA (2003) Global expression profiling of fibroblast responses to transforming growth factor-beta1 reveals the induction of inhibitor of differentiation-1 and provides evidence of smooth muscle cell phenotypic switching. Am J Pathol 162:533–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chang CC et al (2012) Determinants of microvascular network topologies in implanted neovasculatures. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 32:5–14.  https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.238725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chaplain MA, McDougall SR, Anderson AR (2006) Mathematical modeling of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 8:233–257.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chappell JC, Wiley DM, Bautch VL (2011) Regulation of blood vessel sprouting. Semin Cell Dev Biol 22:1005–1011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Charest JM, Califano JP, Carey SP, Reinhart-King CA (2012) Fabrication of substrates with defined mechanical properties and topographical features for the study of cell migration. Macromol Biosci 12:12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201100264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Checa S, Prendergast PJ (2009) A mechanobiological model for tissue differentiation that includes angiogenesis: a lattice-based modeling approach. Ann Biomed Eng 37:129–145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-008-9594-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Costa KD, Hucker WJ, Yin FC (2002) Buckling of actin stress fibers: a new wrinkle in the cytoskeletal tapestry. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 52:266–274.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.10056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Costa G, Harrington KI, Lovegrove HE, Page DJ, Chakravartula S, Bentley K, Herbert SP (2016) Asymmetric division coordinates collective cell migration in angiogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 18:1292–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cullen JP, Sayeed S, Sawai RS, Theodorakis NG, Cahill PA, Sitzmann JV, Redmond EM (2002) Pulsatile flow-induced angiogenesis: role of G(i) subunits. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22:1610–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davies PF, Tripathi SC (1993) Mechanical stress mechanisms and the cell. An endothelial paradigm. Circ Res 72:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Davies PF, Dewey CF Jr, Bussolari SR, Gordon EJ, Gimbrone MA Jr (1984) Influence of hemodynamic forces on vascular endothelial function. In vitro studies of shear stress and pinocytosis in bovine aortic cells. J Clin Invest 73:1121–1129.  https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI111298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davies PF, Remuzzi A, Gordon EJ, Dewey CF Jr, Gimbrone MA Jr (1986) Turbulent fluid shear stress induces vascular endothelial cell turnover in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:2114–2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Davis GE, Camarillo CW (1996) An alpha 2 beta 1 integrin-dependent pinocytic mechanism involving intracellular vacuole formation and coalescence regulates capillary lumen and tube formation in three-dimensional collagen matrix. Exp Cell Res 224:39–51.  https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1996.0109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dewey CF Jr, Bussolari SR, Gimbrone MA Jr, Davies PF (1981) The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. J Biomech Eng 103:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ding H, Shang K, Lan H, Lei Y, Sheng L, Liu Z, Zeng Y (2015) In vitro simulation research on the hoop stress of myocardial bridge – coronary artery. J Cardiothorac Surg 10:60.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0261-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL (2005) Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310:1139–1143.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. DuFort CC, Paszek MJ, Weaver VM (2011) Balancing forces: architectural control of mechanotransduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12:308–319.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Durham JT, Surks HK, Dulmovits BM, Herman IM (2014) Pericyte contractility controls endothelial cell cycle progression and sprouting: insights into angiogenic switch mechanics. Am J Phys Cell Phys 307:C878–C892.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00185.2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Edgar LT, Sibole SC, Underwood CJ, Guilkey JE, Weiss JA (2013) A computational model of in vitro angiogenesis based on extracellular matrix fibre orientation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 16:790–801.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2012.662678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Edgar LT et al (2014a) Mechanical interaction of angiogenic microvessels with the extracellular matrix. J Biomech Eng 136:021001.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Edgar LT, Underwood CJ, Guilkey JE, Hoying JB, Weiss JA (2014b) Extracellular matrix density regulates the rate of neovessel growth and branching in sprouting angiogenesis. PLoS One 9:e85178.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Edgar LT, Hoying JB, Weiss JA (2015a) In silico investigation of angiogenesis with growth and stress generation coupled to local extracellular matrix density. Ann Biomed Eng 43:1531–1542.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1334-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Edgar LT, Maas SA, Guilkey JE, Weiss JA (2015b) A coupled model of neovessel growth and matrix mechanics describes and predicts angiogenesis in vitro. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 14:767–782.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-014-0635-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Eskin SG, Ives CL, Mcintire LV, Navarro LT (1984) Response of cultured endothelial-cells to steady flow. Microvasc Res 28:87–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2862(84)90031-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Folkman J (1997) Angiogenesis and angiogenesis inhibition: an overview. EXS 79:1–8Google Scholar
  47. Forsythe JA, Jiang BH, Iyer NV, Agani F, Leung SW, Koos RD, Semenza GL (1996) Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Mol Cell Biol 16:4604–4613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Frangos JA, Eskin SG, McIntire LV, Ives CL (1985) Flow effects on prostacyclin production by cultured human endothelial cells. Science 227:1477–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fry DL (1978) The thrombotic process and atherogenesis in specific arterial injury. Summary of workshop 3a: hemodynamic injury. Adv Exp Med Biol 104:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Fukumura D, Jain RK (2007) Tumor microenvironment abnormalities: causes, consequences, and strategies to normalize. J Cell Biochem 101:937–949.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gaengel K, Genove G, Armulik A, Betsholtz C (2009) Endothelial-mural cell signaling in vascular development and angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29:630–638.  https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.161521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Gale NW et al (2004) Haploinsufficiency of delta-like 4 ligand results in embryonic lethality due to major defects in arterial and vascular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:15949–15954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Galie PA, Nguyen DH, Choi CK, Cohen DM, Janmey PA, Chen CS (2014) Fluid shear stress threshold regulates angiogenic sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:7968–7973.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1310842111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gerhardt H et al (2003) VEGF guides angiogenic sprouting utilizing endothelial tip cell filopodia. J Cell Biol 161:1163–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ghaffari S, Leask RL, Jones EA (2015) Flow dynamics control the location of sprouting and direct elongation during developmental angiogenesis. Development 142:4151–4157.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.128058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ghaffari S, Leask RL, Jones EA (2017) Blood flow can signal during angiogenesis not only through mechanotransduction, but also by affecting growth factor distribution. Angiogenesis.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-017-9553-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ghajar CM et al (2008) The effect of matrix density on the regulation of 3-D capillary morphogenesis. Biophys J 94:1930–1941.  https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.120774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gjorevski N, Piotrowski AS, Varner VD, Nelson CM (2015) Dynamic tensile forces drive collective cell migration through three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Sci Rep 5:11458.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Gonzalez-Cinca R, Folch R, Benitez R, Ramirez-Piscina L, Casademunt J, Hernandez-Machado A (2003) Phase-field models in interfacial pattern formation out of equilibrium. Adv Condens Matter Stat Phys:203–236. arXiv preprint cond-mat/0305058Google Scholar
  60. Graner F, Glazier JA (1992) Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. Phys Rev Lett 69:2013–2016.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Greenberg JI et al (2008) A role for VEGF as a negative regulator of pericyte function and vessel maturation. Nature 456:809–813.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hamm MJ, Kirchmaier BC, Herzog W (2016) Sema3d controls collective endothelial cell migration by distinct mechanisms via Nrp1 and PlxnD1. J Cell Biol 215:415–430.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201603100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hansen-Smith F, Egginton S, Hudlicka O (1998) Growth of arterioles in chronically stimulated adult rat skeletal muscle. Microcirculation 5:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hellstrom M, Kalen M, Lindahl P, Abramsson A, Betsholtz C (1999) Role of PDGF-B and PDGFR-beta in recruitment of vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes during embryonic blood vessel formation in the mouse. Development 126:3047–3055Google Scholar
  65. Hellstrom M et al (2007) Dll4 signalling through Notch1 regulates formation of tip cells during angiogenesis. Nature 445:776–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Helm CL, Fleury ME, Zisch AH, Boschetti F, Swartz MA (2005) Synergy between interstitial flow and VEGF directs capillary morphogenesis in vitro through a gradient amplification mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:15779–15784.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0503681102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Helmlinger G, Berk BC, Nerem RM (1995) Calcium responses of endothelial cell monolayers subjected to pulsatile and steady laminar flow differ. Am J Phys 269:C367–C375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Hernandez Vera R, Genove E, Alvarez L, Borros S, Kamm R, Lauffenburger D, Semino CE (2009) Interstitial fluid flow intensity modulates endothelial sprouting in restricted Src-activated cell clusters during capillary morphogenesis. Tissue Eng A 15:175–185.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hershey JC, Baskin EP, Glass JD, Hartman HA, Gilberto DB, Rogers IT, Cook JJ (2001) Revascularization in the rabbit hindlimb: dissociation between capillary sprouting and arteriogenesis. Cardiovasc Res 49:618–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Hirschi KK, Rohovsky SA, Beck LH, Smith SR, D’Amore PA (1999) Endothelial cells modulate the proliferation of mural cell precursors via platelet-derived growth factor-BB and heterotypic cell contact. Circ Res 84:298–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hoying JB, Utzinger U, Weiss JA (2014) Formation of microvascular networks: role of stromal interactions directing angiogenic growth. Microcirculation 21:278–289.  https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hsieh HJ, Li NQ, Frangos JA (1991) Shear stress increases endothelial platelet-derived growth factor mRNA levels. Am J Phys 260:H642–H646Google Scholar
  73. Huang S, Ingber DE (1999) The structural and mechanical complexity of cell-growth control. Nat Cell Biol 1:E131–E138.  https://doi.org/10.1038/13043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Hudlicka O (1994) Mechanical factors involved in the growth of the heart and its blood vessels. Cell Mol Biol Res 40:143–152Google Scholar
  75. Hudlicka O, Brown MD (1996) Postnatal growth of the heart and its blood vessels. J Vasc Res 33:266–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Hughes CC (2008) Endothelial-stromal interactions in angiogenesis. Curr Opin Hematol 15:204–209.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282f97dbcCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Hutchings H, Ortega N, Plouet J (2003) Extracellular matrix-bound vascular endothelial growth factor promotes endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and survival through integrin ligation. FASEB J 17:1520–1522.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.02-0691fjeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Huynh J et al (2011) Age-related intimal stiffening enhances endothelial permeability and leukocyte transmigration. Sci Transl Med 3:112ra122.  https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3002761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Iba T, Mills I, Sumpio BE (1992) Intracellular cyclic AMP levels in endothelial cells subjected to cyclic strain in vitro. J Surg Res 52:625–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ingber DE (1991) Control of capillary growth and differentiation by extracellular matrix. Use of a tensegrity (tensional integrity) mechanism for signal processing. Chest 99:34S–40SGoogle Scholar
  81. Ingber DE, Folkman J (1989) Mechanochemical switching between growth and differentiation during fibroblast growth factor-stimulated angiogenesis in vitro: role of extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 109:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ingber DE, Prusty D, Sun Z, Betensky H, Wang N (1995) Cell shape, cytoskeletal mechanics, and cell cycle control in angiogenesis. J Biomech 28:1471–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ishida T, Takahashi M, Corson MA, Berk BC (1997) Fluid shear stress-mediated signal transduction: how do endothelial cells transduce mechanical force into biological responses? Ann N Y Acad Sci 811:12–23; discussion 23-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Jain RK (2003) Molecular regulation of vessel maturation. Nat Med 9:685–693.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0603-685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Jain RK, di Tomaso E, Duda DG, Loeffler JS, Sorensen AG, Batchelor TT (2007) Angiogenesis in brain tumours. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:610–622.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Jakobsson L et al (2010) Endothelial cells dynamically compete for the tip cell position during angiogenic sprouting. Nat Cell Biol 12:943–953.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Javierre E, Vermolen FJ, Vuik C, van der Zwaag S (2009) A mathematical analysis of physiological and morphological aspects of wound closure. J Math Biol 59:605–630.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-008-0242-7MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  88. Jones EA (2011) Mechanical factors in the development of the vascular bed. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 178:59–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2011.03.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Jones EA, Le NF, Eichmann A (2006) What determines blood vessel structure? Genetic prespecification vs. hemodynamics. Physiology (Bethesda) 21:388–395Google Scholar
  90. Joung IS, Iwamoto MN, Shiu YT, Quam CT (2006) Cyclic strain modulates tubulogenesis of endothelial cells in a 3D tissue culture model. Microvasc Res 71:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2005.10.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Jung JE et al (2005) STAT3 is a potential modulator of HIF-1-mediated VEGF expression in human renal carcinoma cells. FASEB J 19:1296–1298.  https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.04-3099fjeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Kanematsu A et al (2004) Type I collagen can function as a reservoir of basic fibroblast growth factor. J Control Release 99:281–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.07.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Kang H, Bayless KJ, Kaunas R (2008) Fluid shear stress modulates endothelial cell invasion into three-dimensional collagen matrices. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295:H2087–H2097.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00281.2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Kassab GS (2006) Scaling laws of vascular trees: of form and function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 290:H894–H903.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00579.2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Kassianidou E, Kumar S (2015) A biomechanical perspective on stress fiber structure and function. Biochim Biophys Acta 1853:3065–3074.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Kilarski WW, Samolov B, Petersson L, Kvanta A, Gerwins P (2009) Biomechanical regulation of blood vessel growth during tissue vascularization. Nat Med 15:657–664.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Kim S, Bell K, Mousa SA, Varner JA (2000) Regulation of angiogenesis in vivo by ligation of integrin alpha5beta1 with the central cell-binding domain of fibronectin. Am J Pathol 156:1345–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Kim S, Chung M, Ahn J, Lee S, Jeon NL (2016) Interstitial flow regulates the angiogenic response and phenotype of endothelial cells in a 3D culture model. Lab Chip 16:4189–4199.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6lc00910gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Kirkpatrick ND, Andreou S, Hoying JB, Utzinger U (2007) Live imaging of collagen remodeling during angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292:H3198–H3206.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.01234.2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Kniazeva E, Putnam AJ (2009) Endothelial cell traction and ECM density influence both capillary morphogenesis and maintenance in 3-D. Am J Phys Cell Phys 297:C179–C187.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00018.2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Kniazeva E, Kachgal S, Putnam AJ (2011) Effects of extracellular matrix density and mesenchymal stem cells on neovascularization in vivo. Tissue Eng A 17:905–914.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Kniazeva E, Weidling JW, Singh R, Botvinick EL, Digman MA, Gratton E, Putnam AJ (2012) Quantification of local matrix deformations and mechanical properties during capillary morphogenesis in 3D. Integr Biol 4:431–439.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ib00120aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Korff T, Augustin HG (1999) Tensional forces in fibrillar extracellular matrices control directional capillary sprouting. J Cell Sci 112(Pt 19):3249–3258Google Scholar
  104. Krishnan L, Weiss JA, Wessman MD, Hoying JB (2004) Design and application of a test system for viscoelastic characterization of collagen gels. Tissue Eng 10:241–252.  https://doi.org/10.1089/107632704322791880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Krishnan L, Hoying JB, Nguyen H, Song H, Weiss JA (2007) Interaction of angiogenic microvessels with the extracellular matrix. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 293:H3650–H3658.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00772.2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Krishnan L, Underwood CJ, Maas S, Ellis BJ, Kode TC, Hoying JB, Weiss JA (2008) Effect of mechanical boundary conditions on orientation of angiogenic microvessels. Cardiovasc Res 78:324–332.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvn055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Krishnan L, Utzinger U, Maas S, Reese S, Weiss JA, Williams SK, Hoying JB (2009) Extracellular matrix stiffness modulates microvascular morphology during early sprouting angiogenesis in vitro. In: ASME 2009 summer bioengineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, pp 1289–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Krishnan R et al (2011) Substrate stiffening promotes endothelial monolayer disruption through enhanced physical forces. Am J Phys Cell Phys 300:C146–C154.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00195.2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Krishnan L, Chang CC, Nunes SS, Williams SK, Weiss JA, Hoying JB (2013) Manipulating the microvasculature and its microenvironment. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 41:91–123.  https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2013008077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Kutcher ME, Kolyada AY, Surks HK, Herman IM (2007) Pericyte Rho GTPase mediates both pericyte contractile phenotype and capillary endothelial growth state. Am J Pathol 171:693–701.  https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2007.070102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Kutys ML, Doyle AD, Yamada KM (2013) Regulation of cell adhesion and migration by cell-derived matrices. Exp Cell Res 319:2434–2439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.05.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Larson DM, Carson MP, Haudenschild CC (1987) Junctional transfer of small molecules in cultured bovine brain microvascular endothelial cells and pericytes. Microvasc Res 34:184–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. LaValley DJ, Reinhart-King CA (2014) Matrix stiffening in the formation of blood vessels. Adv Regen Biol 1:25247.  https://doi.org/10.3402/arb.v1.25247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. le Noble F et al (2004) Flow regulates arterial-venous differentiation in the chick embryo yolk sac. Development 131:361–375.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. LeBlanc AJ, Nevitt CD (2015) Targeting the vessel underdogs: therapeutic approaches for microvessel dysfunction in the heart. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 43:473–489.  https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2016016083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. LeBlanc AJ, Krishnan L, Sullivan CJ, Williams SK, Hoying JB (2012) Microvascular repair: post-angiogenesis vascular dynamics. Microcirculation 19:676–695.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-8719.2012.00207.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Lee S, Zeiger A, Maloney JM, Kotecki M, Van Vliet KJ, Herman IM (2010) Pericyte actomyosin-mediated contraction at the cell-material interface can modulate the microvascular niche. J Phys Condens Matter 22:194115.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/22/19/194115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Lemon G, Howard D, Rose FR, King JR (2011) Individual-based modelling of angiogenesis inside three-dimensional porous biomaterials. Biosystems 103:372–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2010.11.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Levesque MJ, Nerem RM (1985) The elongation and orientation of cultured endothelial-cells in response to shear-stress. J Biomech Eng-T Asme 107:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Lo CM, Wang HB, Dembo M, Wang YL (2000) Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. Biophys J 79:144–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76279-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Logsdon EA, Finley SD, Popel AS, Mac Gabhann F (2014) A systems biology view of blood vessel growth and remodelling. J Cell Mol Med 18:1491–1508.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.12164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Long BL, Rekhi R, Abrego A, Jung J, Qutub AA (2013) Cells as state machines: cell behavior patterns arise during capillary formation as a function of BDNF and VEGF. J Theor Biol 326:43–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.11.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Lu P, Takai K, Weaver VM, Werb Z (2011) Extracellular matrix degradation and remodeling in development and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a005058.  https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Mac Gabhann F, Popel AS (2007) Interactions of VEGF isoforms with VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, and neuropilin in vivo: a computational model of human skeletal muscle. Am J Phys Heart Circ Phys 292:H459–H474.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00637.2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Mac Gabhann F, Ji JW, Popel AS (2006) Computational model of vascular endothelial growth factor spatial distribution in muscle and pro-angiogenic cell therapy. PLoS Comput Biol 2:e127.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Maggelakis SA (2003) A mathematical model of tissue replacement during epidermal wound healing. Appl Math Model 27:189–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0307-904X(02)00100-2CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  127. Mammoto A et al (2009) A mechanosensitive transcriptional mechanism that controls angiogenesis. Nature 457:1103–1108.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Martin A, Komada MR, Sane DC (2003) Abnormal angiogenesis in diabetes mellitus. Med Res Rev 23:117–145.  https://doi.org/10.1002/med.10024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Mason BN, Starchenko A, Williams RM, Bonassar LJ, Reinhart-King CA (2013) Tuning three-dimensional collagen matrix stiffness independently of collagen concentration modulates endothelial cell behavior. Acta Biomater 9:4635–4644.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Matsumoto T, Yung YC, Fischbach C, Kong HJ, Nakaoka R, Mooney DJ (2007) Mechanical strain regulates endothelial cell patterning in vitro. Tissue Eng 13:207–217.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.0058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Mayor R, Etienne-Manneville S (2016) The front and rear of collective cell migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17:97–109.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2015.14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Mayrovitz HN, Wiedeman MP, Noordergraaf A (1975) Microvascular hemodynamic variations accompanying microvessel dimensional changes. Microvasc Res 10:322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Mayrovitz HN, Tuma RF, Wiedeman MP (1977) Relationship between microvascular blood velocity and pressure distribution. Am J Phys 232:H400–H405Google Scholar
  134. McDougall SR, Anderson AR, Chaplain MA, Sherratt JA (2002) Mathematical modelling of flow through vascular networks: implications for tumour-induced angiogenesis and chemotherapy strategies. Bull Math Biol 64:673–702.  https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0293CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  135. McGettrick HM, Butler LM, Buckley CD, Rainger GE, Nash GB (2012) Tissue stroma as a regulator of leukocyte recruitment in inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 91:385–400.  https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0911458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Milde F, Bergdorf M, Koumoutsakos P (2008) A hybrid model for three-dimensional simulations of sprouting angiogenesis. Biophys J 95:3146–3160.  https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.124511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Morin KT, Smith AO, Davis GE, Tranquillo RT (2013) Aligned human microvessels formed in 3D fibrin gel by constraint of gel contraction. Microvasc Res 90:12–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2013.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Mow VC, Holmes MH, Lai WM (1984) Fluid transport and mechanical properties of articular cartilage: a review. J Biomech 17:377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Mudera VC et al (2000) Molecular responses of human dermal fibroblasts to dual cues: contact guidance and mechanical load. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 45:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(200001)45:1<1::AID-CM1>3.0.CO;2-JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Naruse K, Sokabe M (1993) Involvement of stretch-activated ion channels in Ca2+ mobilization to mechanical stretch in endothelial cells. Am J Phys 264:C1037–C1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Nelson CM, Jean RP, Tan JL, Liu WF, Sniadecki NJ, Spector AA, Chen CS (2005) Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:11594–11599.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502575102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Nguyen TD, Jones RE, Boyce BL (2008) A nonlinear anisotropic viscoelastic model for the tensile behavior of the corneal stroma. J Biomech Eng 130:041020.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2947399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Noris M et al (1995) Nitric oxide synthesis by cultured endothelial cells is modulated by flow conditions. Circ Res 76:536–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Nunes SS et al (2010a) Implanted microvessels progress through distinct neovascularization phenotypes. Microvasc Res 79:10–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2009.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Nunes SS, Krishnan L, Gerard CS, Dale JR, Maddie MA, Benton RL, Hoying JB (2010b) Angiogenic potential of microvessel fragments is independent of the tissue of origin and can be influenced by the cellular composition of the implants. Microcirculation 17:557–567.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00052.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Nunes SS, Rekapally H, Chang CC, Hoying JB (2011) Vessel arterial-venous plasticity in adult neovascularization. PLoS One 6:e27332.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Orlidge A, D’Amore PA (1987) Inhibition of capillary endothelial cell growth by pericytes and smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol 105:1455–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Oubaha M et al (2012) Formation of a PKCzeta/beta-catenin complex in endothelial cells promotes angiopoietin-1-induced collective directional migration and angiogenic sprouting. Blood 120:3371–3381.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-03-419721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Patel TH, Kimura H, Weiss CR, Semenza GL, Hofmann LV (2005) Constitutively active HIF-1alpha improves perfusion and arterial remodeling in an endovascular model of limb ischemia. Cardiovasc Res 68:144–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Peirce SM (2008) Computational and mathematical modeling of angiogenesis. Microcirculation 15:739–751.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10739680802220331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Peirce SM, Mac Gabhann F, Bautch VL (2012) Integration of experimental and computational approaches to sprouting angiogenesis. Curr Opin Hematol 19:184–191.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MOH.0b013e3283523ea6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Pelham RJ Jr, Wang Y (1997) Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:13661–13665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Pellegrin S, Mellor H (2007) Actin stress fibres. J Cell Sci 120:3491–3499.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.018473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Pepper MS (1997) Transforming growth factor-beta: vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and vessel wall integrity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 8:21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Pipp F et al (2004) Elevated fluid shear stress enhances postocclusive collateral artery growth and gene expression in the pig hind limb. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24:1664–1668.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000138028.14390.e4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Plutoni C et al (2016) P-cadherin promotes collective cell migration via a Cdc42-mediated increase in mechanical forces. J Cell Biol 212:199–217.  https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201505105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Potente M, Gerhardt H, Carmeliet P (2011) Basic and therapeutic aspects of angiogenesis. Cell 146:873–887.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Price GM, Wong KH, Truslow JG, Leung AD, Acharya C, Tien J (2010) Effect of mechanical factors on the function of engineered human blood microvessels in microfluidic collagen gels. Biomaterials 31:6182–6189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Pries AR, Secomb TW, Gaehtgens P (1995) Design principles of vascular beds. Circ Res 77:1017–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Pries AR, Secomb TW, Gaehtgens P (1998) Structural adaptation and stability of microvascular networks: theory and simulations. Am J Phys 275:H349–H360Google Scholar
  161. Pries AR, Reglin B, Secomb TW (2005) Remodeling of blood vessels: responses of diameter and wall thickness to hemodynamic and metabolic stimuli. Hypertension 46:725–731.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000184428.16429.beCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Pugsley MK, Tabrizchi R (2000) The vascular system. An overview of structure and function J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 44:333-340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Qi YX et al (2016) Nuclear envelope proteins modulate proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells during cyclic stretch application. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:5293–5298.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604569113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Qutub AA, Popel AS (2009) Elongation, proliferation & migration differentiate endothelial cell phenotypes and determine capillary sprouting. BMC Syst Biol 3:13–13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-3-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Qutub AA, Mac Gabhann F, Karagiannis ED, Vempati P, Popel AS (2009) Multiscale models of angiogenesis. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 28:14–31.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2009.931791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Rao RR, Peterson AW, Ceccarelli J, Putnam AJ, Stegemann JP (2012) Matrix composition regulates three-dimensional network formation by endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells in collagen/fibrin materials. Angiogenesis 15:253–264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-012-9257-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. RayChaudhury A, D’Amore PA (1991) Endothelial cell regulation by transforming growth factor-beta. J Cell Biochem 47:224–229.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240470307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Reese SP, Underwood CJ, Weiss JA (2013) Effects of decorin proteoglycan on fibrillogenesis, ultrastructure, and mechanics of type I collagen gels. Matrix Biol 32:414–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2013.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Reginato S, Gianni-Barrera R, Banfi A (2011) Taming of the wild vessel: promoting vessel stabilization for safe therapeutic angiogenesis. Biochem Soc Trans 39:1654–1658.  https://doi.org/10.1042/bst20110652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. Reglin B, Secomb TW, Pries AR (2009) Structural adaptation of microvessel diameters in response to metabolic stimuli: where are the oxygen sensors? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 297:H2206–H2219.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00348.2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. Reinhart-King CA, Dembo M, Hammer DA (2008) Cell-cell mechanical communication through compliant substrates. Biophys J 95:6044–6051.  https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.127662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  172. Resnick N, Yahav H, Shay-Salit A, Shushy M, Schubert S, Zilberman LC, Wofovitz E (2003) Fluid shear stress and the vascular endothelium: for better and for worse. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 81:177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  173. Rivron NC, Vrij EJ, Rouwkema J, Le Gac S, van den Berg A, Truckenmuller RK, van Blitterswijk CA (2012) Tissue deformation spatially modulates VEGF signaling and angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:6886–6891.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201626109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Ruehle MA, Krishnan L, LaBelle SA, Willett NJ, Weiss JA, Guldberg RE (2017) Decorin-containing collagen hydrogels as dimensionally stable scaffolds to study the effects of compressive mechanical loading on angiogenesis. MRS Commun:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1557/mrc.2017.54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Rutkowski JM, Swartz MA (2007) A driving force for change: interstitial flow as a morphoregulator. Trends Cell Biol 17:44–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2006.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Santos-Oliveira P et al (2015) The force at the tip – modelling tension and proliferation in sprouting angiogenesis. PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004436.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Saunders RL, Hammer DA (2010) Assembly of human umbilical vein endothelial cells on compliant hydrogels. Cell Mol Bioeng 3:60–67.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-010-0112-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Scheel K, Fitzgerald E, Martin R, Larsen R (1979) The possible role of mechanical stresses on coronary collateral development during gradual coronary occlusion. In: Schaper W (ed) The pathophysiology of myocardial perfusion. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 489–518Google Scholar
  179. Sears NA, Seshadri DR, Dhavalikar PS, Cosgriff-Hernandez E (2016) A review of three-dimensional printing in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 22:298–310.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2015.0464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Secomb TW, Pries AR (2011) The microcirculation: physiology at the mesoscale. J Physiol 589:1047–1052.  https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2010.201541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. Secomb TW, Dewhirst MW, Pries AR (2011) Structural adaptation of normal and tumour vascular networks. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2011.00815.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. Semenza GL (2000) HIF-1: mediator of physiological and pathophysiological responses to hypoxia. J Appl Physiol 88:1474–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. Shamloo A (2014) Cell-cell interactions mediate cytoskeleton organization and collective endothelial cell chemotaxis. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, NJ) 71:501–512.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.21185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Shamloo A, Heilshorn SC (2010) Matrix density mediates polarization and lumen formation of endothelial sprouts in VEGF gradients. Lab Chip 10:3061–3068.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c005069eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Shamloo A, Mohammadaliha N, Heilshorn SC, Bauer AL (2016) A comparative study of collagen matrix density effect on endothelial sprout formation using experimental and computational approaches. Ann Biomed Eng 44:929–941.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-015-1416-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Shukla A, Dunn AR, Moses MA, Van Vliet KJ (2004) Endothelial cells as mechanical transducers: enzymatic activity and network formation under cyclic strain. Mech Chem Biosyst 1:279–290Google Scholar
  187. Shweiki D, Itin A, Soffer D, Keshet E (1992) Vascular endothelial growth factor induced by hypoxia may mediate hypoxia-initiated angiogenesis. Nature 359:843–845.  https://doi.org/10.1038/359843a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. Sieminski AL, Hebbel RP, Gooch KJ (2004) The relative magnitudes of endothelial force generation and matrix stiffness modulate capillary morphogenesis in vitro. Exp Cell Res 297:574–584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2004.03.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  189. Song JW, Munn LL (2011) Fluid forces control endothelial sprouting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:15342–15347.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105316108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Stabenfeldt SE, Gourley M, Krishnan L, Hoying JB, Barker TH (2012) Engineering fibrin polymers through engagement of alternative polymerization mechanisms. Biomaterials 33:535–544.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Streit M, Riccardi L, Velasco P, Brown LF, Hawighorst T, Bornstein P, Detmar M (1999) Thrombospondin-2: a potent endogenous inhibitor of tumor growth and angiogenesis [In Process Citation]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:14888–14893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. Stupack DG, Cheresh DA (2002) ECM remodeling regulates angiogenesis: endothelial integrins look for new ligands. Sci STKE 2002:pe7.  https://doi.org/10.1126/stke.2002.119.pe7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. Sulsky D, Zhou S-J, Schreyer HL (1995) Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics. Comput Phys Commun 87:236–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(94)00170-7CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  194. Sumpio BE, Banes AJ, Levin LG, Johnson G Jr (1987) Mechanical stress stimulates aortic endothelial cells to proliferate. J Vasc Surg 6:252–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. Sumpio BE, Banes AJ, Buckley M, Johnson G Jr (1988) Alterations in aortic endothelial cell morphology and cytoskeletal protein synthesis during cyclic tensional deformation. J Vasc Surg 7:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. Sun J, Jamilpour N, Wang FY, Wong PK (2014) Geometric control of capillary architecture via cell-matrix mechanical interactions. Biomaterials 35:3273–3280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. Sun X, Evren S, Nunes SS (2015) Blood vessel maturation in health and disease and its implications for vascularization of engineered tissues. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 43:433–454.  https://doi.org/10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.2016016063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. Sun X, Altalhi W, Nunes SS (2016) Vascularization strategies of engineered tissues and their application in cardiac regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 96:183–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2015.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. Tambe DT et al (2011) Collective cell guidance by cooperative intercellular forces. Nat Mater 10:469–475.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Theveneau E, Marchant L, Kuriyama S, Gull M, Moepps B, Parsons M, Mayor R (2010) Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity. Dev Cell 19:39–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Topper JN, Cai J, Falb D, Gimbrone MA Jr (1996) Identification of vascular endothelial genes differentially responsive to fluid mechanical stimuli: cyclooxygenase-2, manganese superoxide dismutase, and endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase are selectively up-regulated by steady laminar shear stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10417–10422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. Travasso RD, Corvera Poire E, Castro M, Rodriguez-Manzaneque JC, Hernandez-Machado A (2011) Tumor angiogenesis and vascular patterning: a mathematical model. PLoS One 6:e19989.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. Trepat X, Fredberg JJ (2011) Plithotaxis and emergent dynamics in collective cellular migration. Trends Cell Biol 21:638–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Tschumperlin DJ et al (2004) Mechanotransduction through growth-factor shedding into the extracellular space. Nature 429:83–86.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Tzima E et al (2005) A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature 437:426–431.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Udan RS, Vadakkan TJ, Dickinson ME (2013) Dynamic responses of endothelial cells to changes in blood flow during vascular remodeling of the mouse yolk sac. Development 140:4041–4050.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.096255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Uematsu M et al (1995) Regulation of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression by shear stress. Am J Phys 269:C1371–C1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Underwood CJ, Edgar LT, Hoying JB, Weiss JA (2014) Cell-generated tkraction forces and the resulting matrix deformation modulate microvascular alignment and growth during angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00995.2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Utzinger U, Baggett B, Weiss JA, Hoying JB, Edgar LT (2015) Large-scale time series microscopy of neovessel growth during angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 18:219–232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-015-9461-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. Uzer G et al (2015) Cell mechanosensitivity to extremely low-magnitude signals is enabled by a LINCed nucleus. Stem Cells 33:2063–2076.  https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Uzer G, Rubin CT, Rubin J (2016) Cell mechanosensitivity is enabled by the LINC nuclear complex. Curr Mol Biol Rep 2:36–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40610-016-0032-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. Van Gieson EJ, Murfee WL, Skalak TC, Price RJ (2003) Enhanced smooth muscle cell coverage of microvessels exposed to increased hemodynamic stresses in vivo. Circ Res 92:929–936.  https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000068377.01063.79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Koolwijk P, Versteilen A, van Hinsbergh VW (2003) Involvement of RhoA/Rho kinase signaling in VEGF-induced endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis in vitro. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23:211–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. van Oers RF, Rens EG, LaValley DJ, Reinhart-King CA, Merks RM (2014) Mechanical cell-matrix feedback explains pairwise and collective endothelial cell behavior in vitro. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003774.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Vavourakis V, Eiben B, Hipwell JH, Williams NR, Keshtgar M, Hawkes DJ (2016) Multiscale mechano-biological finite element modelling of oncoplastic breast surgery – numerical study towards surgical planning and cosmetic outcome prediction. PLoS One 11:e0159766.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. Vempati P, Mac Gabhann F, Popel AS (2010) Quantifying the proteolytic release of extracellular matrix-sequestered VEGF with a computational model. PLoS One 5:e11860.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. Vempati P, Popel AS, Mac Gabhann F (2011) Formation of VEGF isoform-specific spatial distributions governing angiogenesis: computational analysis. BMC Syst Biol 5:59.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  218. Vermolen FJ, Gefen A (2012) A semi-stochastic cell-based formalism to model the dynamics of migration of cells in colonies. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11:183–195.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-011-0302-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. Vitorino P, Meyer T (2008) Modular control of endothelial sheet migration. Genes Dev 22:3268–3281.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1725808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. Vitorino P, Hammer M, Kim J, Meyer T (2011) A steering model of endothelial sheet migration recapitulates monolayer integrity and directed collective migration. Mol Cell Biol 31:342–350.  https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.00800-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. Walpole J, Chappell JC, Cluceru JG, Mac Gabhann F, Bautch VL, Peirce SM (2015) Agent-based model of angiogenesis simulates capillary sprout initiation in multicellular networks. Integr Biol 7:987–997.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ib00024fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Wang DL, Wung BS, Peng YC, Wang JJ (1995) Mechanical strain increases endothelin-1 gene expression via protein kinase C pathway in human endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 163:400–406.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1041630220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. Wang N et al (2001) Mechanical behavior in living cells consistent with the tensegrity model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:7765–7770.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.141199598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. Wimmer R, Cseh B, Maier B, Scherrer K, Baccarini M (2012) Angiogenic sprouting requires the fine tuning of endothelial cell cohesion by the Raf-1/Rok-alpha complex. Dev Cell 22:158–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.11.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. Yao C, Roderfeld M, Rath T, Roeb E, Bernhagen J, Steffens G (2006) The impact of proteinase-induced matrix degradation on the release of VEGF from heparinized collagen matrices. Biomaterials 27:1608–1616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Yeh YT, Hur SS, Chang J, Wang KC, Chiu JJ, Li YS, Chien S (2012) Matrix stiffness regulates endothelial cell proliferation through septin 9. PLoS One 7:e46889.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. Yokoyama S, Matsui TS, Deguchi S (2017) New wrinkling substrate assay reveals traction force fields of leader and follower cells undergoing collective migration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 482:975–979.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.11.142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Zakrzewicz A, Secomb TW, Pries AR (2002) Angioadaptation: keeping the vascular system in shape. News Physiol Sci 17:197–201Google Scholar
  229. Zeng G et al (2007) Orientation of endothelial cell division is regulated by VEGF signaling during blood vessel formation. Blood 109:1345–1352.  https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2006-07-037952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. Zhao S, Suciu A, Ziegler T, Moore JE Jr, Burki E, Meister JJ, Brunner HR (1995) Synergistic effects of fluid shear stress and cyclic circumferential stretch on vascular endothelial cell morphology and cytoskeleton. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 15:1781–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laxminarayanan Krishnan
    • 1
  • Steven A. LaBelle
    • 2
  • Marissa A. Ruehle
    • 1
  • Jeffrey A. Weiss
    • 2
  • James B. Hoying
    • 3
  • Robert E. Guldberg
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Parker H. Petit Institute for Bioengineering and BioscienceGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Bioengineering and Scientific Computing InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA
  3. 3.Advanced Solutions Life SciencesManchesterUSA
  4. 4.Phil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific ImpactUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations