Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences

Living Edition
| Editors: Dana Jalobeanu, Charles T. Wolfe

Hume, David (1711–1776)

  • Tamás DemeterEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_440-1
  • 3 Downloads

Introduction

David Hume is a towering figure of the Scottish Enlightenment, of the history of philosophy in general, and his contributions are significant in the history of the human sciences too. There are several good general introductions available to his ideas and arguments in varying length and detail (for two very different recent ones, see Garrett 2015 and Harris 2015), and I see no obvious ways to improve on the existing literature. So in accordance with the integrative aspirations of this Encyclopedia, this entry will be focused specifically on the much less discussed significance of his philosophy for the history of science. If looked at from this angle, Hume’s contributions can be summarized in at least two possible ways: they can be read as contributions to the early history of modern human sciences from cognitive psychology to sociology and as contributions to the metaphysical and epistemological discourse on then-contemporary knowledge-making practices. Here I propose to...

Related Topics

Robert Boyle Empiricism Experimental method Explanation Habit Inference John Locke Isaac Newton Principles Psychology 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Buckle S (2001) Hume’s Enlightenment Tract. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Cohon R (2008) Hume’s morality: feeling and fabrication. Clarendon, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de Pierris G (2015) Ideas, evidence, and method: Hume’s skepticism and naturalism concerning knowledge and causation. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demeter T (2016) David Hume and the culture of Scottish Newtonianism: methodology and ideology in Enlightenment inquiry. Brill, LeidenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demeter T (2019) Hume on the social construction of mathematical knowledge. Synthese 196:3615–3631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Demeter T (2021) Philosophical methods. In: Garrett A, Harris J (eds) Scottish philosophy in the eighteenth century, vol 2. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Fodor J (2003) Hume variations. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Garrett D (2015) Hume. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Gaukroger S (2014) Empiricism as a development of experimental natural philosophy. In: Biener Z, Schliesser E (eds) Newton and empiricism. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 15–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris J (2015) Hume: an intellectual biography. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hazony Y, Schliesser E (2016) Newton and Hume. In: Russell P (ed) The Oxford handbook of Hume. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 673–707Google Scholar
  12. Hume D (1998) An enquiry concerning the principles of morals (ed: Beauchamp TL). Clarendon, Oxford. [EPM]Google Scholar
  13. Hume D (2000) An enquiry concerning human understanding (ed: Beauchamp TL). Clarendon, Oxford. [EHU]Google Scholar
  14. Hume D (2007) A treatise of human nature, 2 vols (eds: Norton DF, Norton MJ). Clarendon, Oxford. [T]Google Scholar
  15. Landy D (2017) Hume’s science of human nature: scientific realism, reason, and substantial explanation. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McGuire JE (1970) Atoms and the ‘analogy of nature’: Newton’s third rule of philosophizing. Stud Hist Phil Sci 1:3–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merivale A (2018) Hume on art, emotion, and superstition. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Penelhum T (2000) Themes in Hume. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Sargent R-M (1995) The diffident naturalist: Robert Boyle and the philosophy of experiment. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schliesser E (2009) Hume’s attack on Newton’s philosophy. Enlightenment and Dissent 26:167–203Google Scholar
  21. Stroud B (1977) Hume. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wilson DB (2009) Seeking nature’s logic: natural philosophy in the Scottish Enlightenment. University of Pennsylvania Press, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  23. Wood PB (1995) The Aberdeen Enlightenment: the arts curriculum in the eighteenth century. Aberdeen University Press, AberdeenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of PhilosophyResearch Centre for the HumanitiesBudapestHungary
  2. 2.University of PécsPécsHungary

Section editors and affiliations

  • Dana Jalobeanu
    • 1
  • Charles T. Wolfe
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of PhilosophyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Sarton Centre for History of ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium