Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences

Living Edition
| Editors: Dana Jalobeanu, Charles T. Wolfe

Women Philosophers in the French Revolution (Gouges, Roland, Grouchy)

  • Sandrine BergèsEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_415-1
  • 2 Downloads

Introduction

Because one of the values of the French Revolution was equality, it is not surprising that a number of philosophers and political thinkers asked questions about the role and place of women in the new republic. Some of these thinkers were men, such as Nicolas de Condorcet, who published a paper defending women’s rights to citizenship. But those who were immediately concerned by potential reforms also produced writings on various aspects of the Revolution and the political reforms it promised.

Women wrote to defend the French Revolution in England (e.g., Catharine Macaulay, Mary Wollstonecraft) and in France (Olympe de Gouges, Manon Roland, Sophie de Grouchy – and many more). Although they were greatly influenced by Rousseau, as were most revolutionary writers, they took issues with the more misogynist aspects of his writings, while engaging with his arguments regarding the nature of women and their function in a republic. The result of their engagement was a new or...

Related Topics

Women on Liberty Education Les Salonières Society and Sociability 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bergès S (2015) Sophie de Grouchy on the cost of domination in the letters on sympathy and two anonymous articles in Le Républicain. Monist 98:102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergès S (2016a) A republican housewife: Marie-Jeanne Phlippon Roland on women’s political role. Hypatia 31:107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergès S (2016b) Wet-Nursing and political participation: the republican approaches to motherhood of Mary Wollstonecraft and Sophie de Grouchy. In: Bergès S, Coffee A (eds) The social and political philosophy of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mind association occasional series. Oxford, Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergès S (2018) Olympe de Gouges vs Rousseau: happiness, primitive societies and the theatre. J Am Philos Assoc 4(4):433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berville J, Barrière A (1827) Mémoires de Madame Roland, avec une notice sur sa vie, des notes et des éclaircissements historiques. Baudoin Frère, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanc O (2014) Olympe de Gouges, Des Droits de la Femme à la Guillotine. Tallandier, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Coffee AMSJ (2017) Catharine Macaulay’s republican conception of social and political liberty. Polit Stud.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321716686991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Condorcet N (1790) “Sur l’Admission des Femmes au droits de la cité” Journal of the Society of 1789 (3 July 1790); “On the emancipation of women”. In: Lukes S, Urbinati N (eds) Condorcet: political writings. 2012. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Dauban CA (1864) Etude sur Madame Roland et son temps. Plon, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Gouges O (1789) Le Bonheur Primitif, ou Rêveries Patriotiques.Royer, Libraire, Quai des Augustins, Bailly, barrière des Sergens, Amsterdam/Paris. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k42599j.r=Le+bonheur+primitif+de+l’homme,+ou+les+rêveries+patriotiques.langFR
  11. Gouges O (1792) L’esclavage des noirs ou l’heureux naufrage, Drame en Trois Actes, representé à la Comédie Francaise en Décember 1789. La veuve Duchesne, rue Saint-Jacques, La veuve Bailly, barrière des Sergens, et chez les Marchands de Nouveautés, Paris. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k566870
  12. Green K (2015) A history of women’s political thought in Europe, 1700–1800. Press, Cambridge UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Green K, Petix A (2013) Etta Palm d’Aelders and Louise Keralio-Robert: ‘Feminist controversy during the French Revolution’. In: Curtis-Wendlandt L, Gibbard P, Green K (eds) Political ideas of Enlightenment women: virtue and citizenship. Ashgate, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  14. Grouchy S (2008) In: Brown K, McClellan JE III (eds) Letters on sympathy (1798) a critical edition, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New series, vol. 98, pt. 4. American Philosophical Society, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillois A (1897) La Marquise de Condorcet, Sa Famille, Son Salon, Ses Amis 1764–1822. Paul Ollendorff, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Gutwirth M (2004) Suzanne Necker’s legacy: breastfeeding as Metonym in Germaine de Stael’s Delphine. Eighteenth Century Life 28(2):17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halldenius L (2015) Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism. Pickering and Chatto, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hesse C (2001) The other Enlightenment: how French women became modern. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobus M (1992) Incorruptible milk: breastfeeding and the French Revolution. In: Melzer SE, Rabine LW (eds) Rebel daughters women and the French Revolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Pateman C (1980) “The disorder of women”. Women, love and the sense of justice. Ethics 91(1):20–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reynolds S (2012) Marriage and revolution: Monsieur et Madame Roland. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rousseau J-J (1968) Letter to D’Alembert on the theatre (trans: Bloom A) Politics and the arts. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  23. Rousseau J-J (1997a) New Heloise. Edited by J Vache. Translated by P Steward. University Press of New England, LebanonGoogle Scholar
  24. Rousseau J-J (1997b) In: Gourevitch V (ed) The discourses and other early political writings. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott J (1997) Only paradoxes to offer: French feminists and the rights of man. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith A (2002) In: Haakonsen K (ed) The theory of moral sentiments. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Trouille MS (1997) Sexual politics in the Enlightenment. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  28. Wollstonecraft M (2014) In: Botting EH (ed) A vindication of the rights of woman. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyBilkent UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Section editors and affiliations

  • Ruth Hagengruber
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Humanwissenschaften, PhilosophieUniversität PaderbornPaderbornDeutschland