Advertisement

Learning Theories: The Role of Epistemology, Science, and Technology

  • Linda HarasimEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Scientific theories emerged in the nineteenth century to explain natural and social phenomena and became the basis for the twentieth century theories of learning: Behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. Behaviorism and cognitivism were based on an objectivist epistemology emphasizing an absolute “truth,” efficiency, and the superiority of technology; constructivist learning theory was based on an epistemology of progressive change, knowledge building, and human agency. The rise of educational computing and computer networking in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries sharpened epistemological and pedagogical differences: objectivist epistemologies emphasized the role of technology to replace human teachers. Learning theories based on constructivist epistemologies also emerged, emphasizing the role of technology to augment rather than replace human intelligence. Online collaborative learning theory, later renamed collaborativism, is the major learning theory and pedagogy that argues for technology to advance rather than replace human agency and provides empirical evidence of augmenting human learning in the digital age.

Keywords

Behaviourism Cognitivism Constructivism Constructivist Epistemology Connectionism Connectivism Collaborativism Learning Theory Technology Online Learning Education Theory Epistemology Pedagogy Discourse Educators Science, Scientific Thought or Scientific Epistemology Metaphysical Thought or Metaphysical Epistemology Positivism Conditioning Classical Conditioning Operant Conditioning Artificial Intelligence Augmented Human Intelligence Computer Networking Machine Learning MOOCs Objectivist Epistemology Open AI Facebook Google Apple Microsoft Pavlov Watson Thorndike Skinner Piaget Vygotsky Siemens Downes 

References

  1. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2004). Entering the mainstream: The quality and extent of online education in the United States, 2003 and 2004. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved November 26, 2009, from www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/entering_mainstream.pdf
  2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007). Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved November 26, 2009, from www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/online_nation.pdf
  3. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2008). NASULGC–Sloan national commission on online learning benchmarking study: Preliminary findings. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved November 26, 2009, from www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/nasulgc_prelim
  4. Andre, T., & Phye, G. D. (1986). Cognition, learning and education. In G. D. Phye & T. Andre (Eds.), Cognitive classroom learning. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bates, T. (2015). Is there a future in online learning? Online learning and distance education resources. Retrieved April 5, 2016, from Http://www.tonybates.ca/2015/09/07/is-there-a-future-in-online-learning/
  6. Bates, T. (2016). Automation or empowerment: Online learning at the crossroads, Online learning and distance education resources. Retrieved April 5, 2016, from http://www.tonybates.ca/2016/01/11/automation-or-empowerment-online-learning-at-the-crossroads/#sthash.75h5FZnl.dpuf
  7. Bates, A. W., & Pool, G. (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education. Foundations for success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63, 873–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bredo, E. (2006). Conceptual confusion and educational psychology. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  10. Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bruner, J. S. (1962). Introduction. In L. S. Vygotsky (Ed.), Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cellan-Jones, R. (2014, December 2). Stephen Hawking warns artificial intelligence could end mankind. BBC Interview. Retrieved May 16, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-30290540
  13. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s verbal behaviour. Language, 35(1), 26–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarck, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Downes, S. (2007, March 29). What I’m working on, from Downes’ Blog. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from http://www.downes.ca/post/40879
  17. Downes, S. (2012). Creating the connectivist course. Retrieved January 6, 2012, from http://www.downes.ca/post/57750
  18. Duffy, T. M., & Cunningham, D. J. (1996). Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for research for educational communications and technology. New York, NY: Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Engelbart, D., & Lehtman, H. (1988). Working together. Byte, 13(13), 245–252.Google Scholar
  20. Farrell, M. P. (2001). Collaborative circles: Friendship dynamics & creative work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. New York, NY: CBS College Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Gagne, R. M., & Driscoll, M. P. (1988). Essentials of learning for instruction (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Gagne, R. M., & Medsker, K. (1996). The conditions of learning: Training applications. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace and Company.Google Scholar
  24. Gardner, H. (2008). Wrestling with Jean Piaget, my paragon. In What have you changed your mind about? Edge Foundation, Inc. Retrieved November 26, 2009, from www.edge.org/q2008/q08_1.html#gardner
  25. Gibbs, S. (2015, July 27). Musk, Wozniak and Hawking urge ban on warfare AI and autonomous weapons. The Guardian, UK.Google Scholar
  26. Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of the teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition (pp. 117–138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Griffin, Andrew (2016). Stephen Hawking: Humanity is going to use science and technology to wipe itself out, professor warns, The Independent, January 19, 2016. Retrieved May 31, 2016 from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking-humanity-a6821341.html.
  28. Hafner, K., & Lyon, M. (1996). Where wizards stay up late: The origins of the internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Harasim, L. M. (1990). Online education: Perspectives on a new environment. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  30. Harasim, L. M. (2002). What makes online learning communities successful? The role of collaborative learning in social and intellectual development. In C. Vrasidas & G. V. Glass (Eds.), Distance education and distributed learning (pp. 181–200). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Harasim, L. (2004). Collaboration. In A. DeStafano, K. Rudestam, & R. Silverman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of distributed learning (pp. 65–68). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Harasim, L. M. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. New York, NY: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  33. Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  34. Harasim, L. & Smith, D.E. (1986). Final report on the ontario women educators’ computer research network. Toronto, ON: Federation of Women Teachers’ Association of Ontario (100 pp).Google Scholar
  35. Harasim, L., & Smith, D.E. (1994). Making connections, thinking change together: Women teachers and computer networks. In: Bourne, P. (ed.) Feminism and Education: A Canadian Perspective: Toronto ON: CWSE, OISEGoogle Scholar
  36. Harasim, L. M., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turnoff, M. (1995). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hawking, S., Russel, S., Tegmark, M., & Wilczek, F. (2014, May 1). Stephen Hawking: ‘Transcendence looks at the implications of artificial intelligence – But are we taking AI seriously enough?’. The Independent. Retrieved May 17, 2016, from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking-transcendence-looks-at-the-implications-of-artificial-intelligence-but-are-we-taking-9313474.html
  38. Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Interactive Educational Systems Design (IESD). (2009). National online survey of district technology directors exploring district use of Web 2.0 technologies. Retrieved January 31, 2010, from www.lightspeedsystems.com/researchsurvey
  40. Jonassen, D. H., Beissner, K., & Yacci, M. (1993). Structural knowledge: Techniques for representing, conveying, and acquiring structural knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  41. Kelly, H. (2015, December 12). Elon Musk and tech heavies invest $1 billion in artificial intelligence. CNN Money. Retrieved March 18, 2016, from http://money.cnn.com/2015/12/12/technology/openai-elon-musk/index.html
  42. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kurzweil, R. (2006). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, D. (2016, January 26). AI pioneer Marvin Minsky dies aged 88. BBC News Technology. http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35409119
  45. Luckerson, V. (2014, December 2). 5 very smart people who think artificial intelligence could bring the apocalypse. Time Magazine. Retrieved March 18, 2016, from http://time.com/3614349/artificial-intelligence-singularity-stephen-hawking-elon-musk/
  46. Mazur, E. (2009). Education: Farewell, lecture? Science, 323(5910), 50–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Minsky, M., & Papert, S. (1988). Perceptrons (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Munari, A. (1994). Jean Piaget (1896–1980). Prospects: The quarterly review of comparative education, XXIV(1/2), 311–327. Retrieved November 26, 2009, from ww.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/archieve/publications/ThinkersPdf/piagate.PDF
  49. Nelson, T. H. (1974). Dream machines. South Bend, IN: The Distributors.Google Scholar
  50. Nelson, T. H. (1987). Literary machines. South Bend, IN: The Distributors.Google Scholar
  51. Papert, S. (1999, March). Papert on Piaget. Time Magazine – The Century’s Greatest Minds.Google Scholar
  52. Piaget, J. (1969). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  53. Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores – And teaches. School and Society, 23(586), 373–376.Google Scholar
  54. Santrock, J. W. (2008). A topical approach to life span development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  55. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Swyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of learning sciences (pp. 97–118). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved September 30, 2015, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
  57. Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge, creative commons. Retrieved January 19, 2016 from http://www.elearnspace.org/KnowingKnowledge_LowRes.pdf.
  58. Siemens, G. (2011). From knowledge to bathroom renovations, July 3, 2011, from www.connectivism.ca (no longer available). Retrieved January 19, 2016, from http://www.scoop.it/t/connectivism?q=Bathroom+renovations
  59. Siemens, G. (2015). Adios Ed Tech. Hola something else. Retrieved September 9, 2015, from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2015/09/09/adios-ed-tech-hola-something-else/#comments)
  60. Skinner, B. F. (1948). Walden two. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  61. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Skinner, B. F. (1964). New methods and new aims in teaching. New Scientist, 122, 483.Google Scholar
  63. Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann, & G. Vakar, Ed. & Trans.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  65. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wilson, B. G. (1997). Thoughts on theory in educational technology. Educational Technology, 37(1), 22–27.Google Scholar
  67. Winn, W., & Snyder, D. (1996). Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for research for educational communications and technology. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  68. Zuboff, S. (2016, May 3). The secrets of surveillance capitalism. Frankfurter Allgemeine Feuilleton. Retrieved May 30, 2016, from http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/the-digital-debate/shoshana-zuboff-secrets-of-surveillance-capitalism-14103616.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations