What Motivates Exemplary Online Teachers? A Multiple-Case Study

Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history



Teachers’ embracing of online teaching is a key factor in the growth of online education. While it is critical to examine exemplary online teachers’ practices to present models for successful online teaching, limited research exists on why exemplary teachers decide to teach online. In order to identify strategies for supporting online teachers, a multiple case study was conducted in the context of a large research university in the Midwestern United States. Ethnographic interviews were conducted with six online teachers identified as exemplary. Results suggested that both intrinsic factors (e.g., observing exemplary courses, having a background in distance education, answering the needs of nontraditional students, and trying alternative approaches to online teaching) and extrinsic factors (e.g., technology, pedagogy, professional development, and financial support) influenced exemplary online teachers’ decisions to teach online. The results of this study reveal critical recommendations for faculty support and development for online teaching.


e-Learning Multiple case study Online teacher 


  1. Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2014). Grade change: Tracking online education in the United States. Newburyport, MA: Online Learning Consortium. Retrieved from Scholar
  2. Bailey, C. J., & Card, K. A. (2009). Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: Perception of experienced instructors. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 152–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baran, E., & Correia, A.-P. (2014). A professional development framework for online teaching. Techtrends: Linking Reasearch and Practice to Improve Learning, 58(5), 95–101. doi:10.1007/s11528-014-0791-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baran, E., Correia, A.-P., & Thompson, A. (2013). Tracing successful online teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–41.Google Scholar
  5. Bolliger, D., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education, 30(1), 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonk, C. (2006). Online teaching in an online world. Bloomington, IN: Retrieved from Scholar
  7. Brooks, C. F. (2010). Toward ‘hybridised’ faculty development for the twenty-first century: Blending online communities of practice and face-to-face meetings in instructional and professional support programmes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, C., Shen, H.-Y., & Liu, Z.-F. (2014). University faculty’s perspectives on the roles of e-instructors and their online instruction practice. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3). Retrieved from:
  9. Chen, T., & Chen, T. (2006). Examination of attitudes towards teaching online courses based on theory of reasoned action of university faculty in Taiwan. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 683–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conceição, S. (2006). Faculty lived experiences in the online environment. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(1), 26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook, R., Ley, K., Crawford, C., & Warner, A. (2009). Motivators and inhibitors for university faculty in distance and e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Boer, W., & Collis, B. (2005). Becoming more systematic about flexible learning: Beyond time and distance. Research in Learning Technology, 13(1). Retrieved from
  13. Glaser, B. G. (2002). Constructivist grounded theory? Forum Qualitative Social Research, 3(3). Retrieved from
  14. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  15. Gonzalez, C. (2009). Conceptions of, and approaches to, teaching online: A study of lecturers teaching postgraduate distance courses. Higher Education, 57(3), 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kale, U., Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2009). Assisting teachers’ thinking and participation online. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 287–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, K.-J., & Frick, T. (2011). Changes in student motivation during online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. King, K. (2002). Identifying success in online teacher education and professional development. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levine, A., & Sun, J. (2002). Barriers to distance education. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
  20. Lin, Y.-M., Lin, G.-Y., & Laffey, J. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Maguire, L. (2005). Literature review – faculty participation in online distance education: Barriers and motivators. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). Retrieved from
  23. Major, C. (2010). Do virtual professors dream of electric students? College faculty experiences with online distance education. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 2154–2208.Google Scholar
  24. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Ndubisi, N. O. (2006). Factors of online learning adoption: A comparative juxtaposition of the theory of planned behavior and the technology acceptance model. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(4), 571–591.Google Scholar
  26. O’Quinn, L. (2002). Factors that deter faculty from participating in distance education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(4). Retrieved from
  27. Roby, T., Ashe, S., Singh, N., & Clark, C. (2013). Shaping the online experience: How administrators can influence student and instructor perceptions through policy and practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Samarawickrema, G., & Stacey, E. (2007). Adopting web-based learning and teaching: A case study in higher education. Distance Education, 28(3), 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schifter, C. (2000). Faculty motivators and inhibitors for participation in distance education. Educational Technology, 40(2), 43–46.Google Scholar
  30. Seaman, J. (2009). Online learning as a strategic asset. Volume II: The paradox of faculty voices. Washington DC: Association of Public and Land-Grant Universities, Sloan Consortium, and Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from
  31. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  32. Ulmer, L., Watson, L., & Derby, D. (2007). Perceptions of higher education faculty members on the value of distance education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 59–70.Google Scholar
  33. Van De Vord, R., & Pogue, K. (2012). Teaching time investment: Does online really take more time than face-to-face? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(3), 132–146. Retrieved from Scholar
  34. Wan, E. (2005). Teacher empowerment: Concepts, strategies, and implications for schools in Hong Kong. Teachers College Record, 107(4), 842–861.Google Scholar
  35. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Zhang, J., & Walls, R. (2009). Instructors’ self-perceived pedagogical principle implementation in the online environment. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(4), 413–426.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational SciencesMiddle East Technical UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations