Abstract
For many adults, doing a doctoral study at a distance can be a very challenging process. In that process, many adult students face a series of disorienting dilemmas. Those moments may trigger critical reflection and rational dialogue, which in turn may lead to planning different actions and developing new perspectives: effectively, transformative learning. However, given that transformative learning processes are often accompanied by negative emotional experiences, which can result in failures and dropouts, it is very important to provide online doctoral students with appropriate pedagogical support. This chapter introduces “autoethnography” as a pedagogical method, illustrating how it can be used to facilitate and support transformative learning experiences of online doctoral students (as well as the ones of online tutors). The chapter is built upon the author’s multi-year design-and-teaching experiences on one UK-based online doctoral programme in the field of educational research. In this focused case, 24 adult students in a single cohort are all working professionals in different educational contexts, pursuing their doctoral study as part-time distance students. Many of them have experienced disorienting dilemmas while participating in the very first module of their online doctoral programme. To support online doctoral students’ transformative learning, the author has used and taught a qualitative methodology of “autoethnography,” which allows researchers to articulate their personal experiences and emotions and use them to explore and interpret aspects of their own cultural practice and social relationships. The chapter also describes how using autoethnography as a pedagogical method has guided the author’s course (re-)design and teaching practices, which further enable the author to effectively transform her pedagogical perspectives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Adams, T. E., Holman Jones, S., & Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography: Understanding qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (2006). Autoethnography. In G. J. Shepherd, J. S. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as…: Perspectives on theory (pp. 110–122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Campbell, K. (2015). The feminist instructional designer: An autoethnography. In: B. Hokanson, G. Clinton, & M. Tracey (Eds.), The design of learning experience. Cham: Springer.
Chang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as a method. Abingdon, England: Taylor & Francis.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abingdon, England: Taylor & Francis.
Ellis, C. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.
Glisczinski, D. J. (2007). Transformative higher education: A meaningful degree of understanding. Journal of Transformative Education, 5(4), 317–328.
Hannafin, M. J. (1989). Interaction strategies and emerging instructional technologies: Psychological perspectives. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 18, 167–179.
Herbers, M. S. (1998). Perspective transformation in preservice teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis, Tennessee.
Johnson, B. R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
Lee, K. (2015). Discourses and realities of online higher education: A history of [discourses of] online education in Canada’s Open University (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto).
Lee, K. (2018). Everyone already has their community beyond the screen: Reconceptualizing online learning and expanding boundaries. Educational Technology Research & Development, 66, 1255–1268.
Lee, K., & Brett, C. (2015). Dialogic understanding of teachers’ online transformative learning: A qualitative case study of teacher discussions in a graduate-level online course. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 72–83.
Lee, K., Choi, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2019). Becoming a competent self: A developmental process of adult distance learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 25–33.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions in adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation. Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1, 58–63.
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New directions for adult and continuing education, 1997(74), 5–12.
Stevens-Long, J., Schapiro, S. A., & McClintock, C. (2012). Passionate scholars: Transformative learning in doctoral education. Adult Education Quarterly, 62(2), 180–198.
Woo, Y., & Reeves, T. C. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation. Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 15–25.
Yorks, L., & Kasl, E. (2006). I know more than I can say: A taxonomy for using expressive ways of knowing to foster transformative learning. Journal of Transformative Education, 4(1), 43–64.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lee, K. (2019). Transformative Learning in an Online Doctoral Programme: Autoethnography as a Pedagogical Method. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds) Learning, Design, and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_150-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_150-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17727-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education