Skip to main content

Prejudice as an Expression of Tribalism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Racism and prejudice; Tribalism; Tribalism in moral tribes

Definition

People show a set of tribalistic tendencies such as ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination since they were adaptive in the past environmental conditions. In other words, groups that showed stronger ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination were more likely to survive in the past selective pressures. Therefore, prejudice can be seen as a reflection of our evolved tribalist psychology.

Introduction

The finding that people cooperate more with members of their own group and thereby show tribal tendencies has been established in many different areas of research (Balliet et al. 2018; Fowler and Kam 2007; Yamagishi and Mifune 2016). For example, Ben-Ner et al. (2009) showed that when people share an identity (religious, political, etc.), they tend to make clear distinctions between ingroups and outgroups in their intended and actual social behavior. Other research shows that newborns show preferential...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balliet, D., Tybur, J. M., Wu, J., Antonellis, C., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2018). Political ideology, trust, and cooperation: In-group favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US national election. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(4), 797–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361–382). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Haim, Y., Ziv, T., Lamy, D., & Hodes, R. M. (2006). Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychological Science, 17(2), 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner, A., McCall, B. P., Stephane, M., & Wang, H. (2009). Identity and in-group/out-group differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72(1), 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J. (2017). Predicting ideological prejudice. Psychological Science, 28, 713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617693004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J., & Van Tongeren, D. R. (2017). People both high and low on religious fundamentalism are prejudiced toward dissimilar groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 76. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. J., Reyna, C., Chambers, J. R., Crawford, J. T., & Wetherell, G. (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413510932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Waal, F. B., Leimgruber, K., & Greenberg, A. R. (2008). Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(36), 13685–13689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., & Kam, C. D. (2007). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 813–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geary, D. C. (2005). Origin of mind: Evolution of brain, cognition, and general intelligence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, N., Martinez, M. A., Gutierrez, N. L., Diesendruck, G., Banaji, M. R., & Santos, L. R. (2011). The evolution of intergroup bias: Perceptions and attitudes in rhesus macaques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 387–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nail, P. R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A. E., Steele, G. M., & Thompson, A. W. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B. K. (2006). Weapon bias: Split-second decisions and unintended stereotyping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(6), 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., & Mifune, N. (2016). Parochial altruism: Does it explain modern human group psychology? Current Opinion in Psychology, 7, 39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, O., Karadöller, D. Z., & Sofuoglu, G. (2016). Analytic thinking, religion, and prejudice: An experimental test of the dual-process model of mind. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 26(4), 360–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onurcan Yilmaz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Yilmaz, O. (2019). Prejudice as an Expression of Tribalism. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3807-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3807-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics