Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Modeling Language Transmission

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3353-1

Definition

Languages adapt as they are transmitted from one generation to the next. Modeling language transmission in computer simulations and laboratory experiments shows how this process gives rise to the structure found in language.

Introduction

Language is a defining characteristic of our species, so understanding its evolutionary origins is central to understanding human evolution. In their seminal paper, Pinker and Bloom (1990) argued that the evolution of language is best understood as the result of conventional Darwinian processes, just like other complex biological traits. However, languages themselves also adapt and evolve over repeated episodes of learning and use, providing two evolutionary mechanisms that shape language: the biological evolution of the human capacity for language andthe cultural evolution of language itself. This entry outlines the consequences of cultural evolution for language and gives examples of how modeling language transmission can shed light on...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Carr, J. W., Smith, K., Cornish, H., & Kirby, S. (2016). The cultural evolution of structured languages in an open-ended, continuous world. Cognitive Science. doi:10.1111/cogs.12371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–558. doi:10.1017/S0140525X08004998.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Fitch, W. T. (2010). The evolution of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569–1579. doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kirby, S. (2002). Learning, bottlenecks and the evolution of recursive syntax. In T. Briscoe (Ed.), Linguistic evolution through language acquisition: Formal and computational models (pp. 173–203). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486524.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 10681–10686. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707835105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kirby, S., Griffiths, T. L., & Smith, K. (2014). Iterated learning and the evolution of language. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 28, 108–114. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirby, S., Tamariz, M., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2015). Compression and communication in the cultural evolution of linguistic structure. Cognition, 141, 87–102. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Thompson, B., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2016). Culture shapes the evolution of cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 4530–4535. doi:10.1073/pnas.1523631113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK