Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Innate and Learned Tool Use

  • Ivo Jacobs
  • Mathias Osvath
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3154-1

Definition

Innate tool use normally means that it is a highly heritable evolved adaptation, found in at least one age-sex class, or not learned.

Introduction

The concept of innateness is surrounded by controversy. Some claim it is a meaningful notion, while others argue it has no explanatory power. Innateness is commonly pitted against learning, but definitions vary widely. There are at least nine different meanings of innate: “present at birth or particular stage of development; not learned; genetic – highly heritable; adapted during evolution; develops before function is established; shared by all members of species/sex/age group; a functional behavioral system; controlled by a specialized neural module; and developmentally robust – well-canalized” (Bateson and Curley 2013). For the sake of clarity, it is therefore more appropriate to talk about specific meanings than innateness in general.

Tool use in nonhuman animals has often been described as either innate or learned, but a...

Keywords

Hermit Crab Morphological Adaptation Daily Energy Intake Chemical Shield Egyptian Vulture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bateson, P., & Curley, J. (2013). Developmental approaches to behavioural biology. Nova Acta Leopoldina, 111, 89–110.Google Scholar
  2. Hopkins, W. D., Russell, J. L., & Schaeffer, J. (2014). Chimpanzee intelligence is heritable. Current Biology, 24, 1649–1652. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.076.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Hunt, G. R., Gray, R. D., & Taylor, A. H. (2013). Why is tool use rare in animals? In C. M. Sanz, J. Call, & C. Boesch (Eds.), Tool use in animals: Cognition and ecology (pp. 89–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511894800.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Matsui, H., Hunt, G. R., Oberhofer, K., Ogihara, N., McGowan, K. J., Mithraratne, K., Yamasaki, T., Gray, R. D., & Izawa, E.-I. (2016). Adaptive bill morphology for enhanced tool manipulation in New Caledonian crows. Scientific Reports, 6, 22776. doi:10.1038/srep22776.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Meulman, E. J. M., Seed, A. M., & Mann, J. (2013). If at first you don’t succeed… Studies of ontogeny shed light on the cognitive demands of habitual tool use. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368, 20130050. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rutz, C., & St Clair, J. (2012). The evolutionary origins and ecological context of tool use in New Caledonian crows. Behavioural Processes, 89, 153–165. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2011.11.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rutz, C., Klump, B. C., Komarczyk, L., Leighton, R., Kramer, J., Wischnewski, S., Sugasawa, S., Morrissey, M. B., James, R., St Clair, J. J. H., Switzer, R. A., & Masuda, B. M. (2016). Discovery of species-wide tool use in the Hawaiian crow. Nature, 537, 403–407. doi:10.1038/nature19103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shumaker, R. W., Walkup, K. R., & Beck, B. B. (2011). Animal tool behavior: The use and manufacture of tools by animals. Baltimore: JHU Press.Google Scholar
  9. Tebbich, S., & Teschke, I. (2013). Why do woodpecker finches use tools? In C. M. Sanz, J. Call, & C. Boesch (Eds.), Tool use in animals: Cognition and ecology (pp. 134–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511894800.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Woodley of Menie, M. A., Fernandes, H. B. F., & Hopkins, W. D. (2015). The more g-loaded, the more heritable, evolvable, and phenotypically variable: Homology with humans in chimpanzee cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 50, 159–163. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lund UniversityLundSweden

Section editors and affiliations

  • Catherine Salmon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of RedlandsRedlandsUSA