Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Altruism Norms

  • Aaron BermondEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3061-1

Synonyms

Definition

Altruism refers to any helping behavior whose intended goal is to improve another’s welfare, typically at some cost to the helper. Altruism norms are defined as the typical patterns of behavior seen surrounding these selfless acts. This chapter will summarize prototypical norms of altruism that are commonly seen in families and societies.

Introduction

Altruism norms have evolved and changed throughout the course of human history and can include things such as self-sacrifice, philanthropy, or just doing a good deed. It has been suggested that altruism is influenced in part by genetic factors but more so by the types of societies to which individuals are exposed (Bell et al. 2009). Altruism can be seen as an evolved mechanism that is molded to fit within the norms of different cultures, yet it operates automatically when loved ones, family members, or even strangers require help.

Kin Selection and Pro-family Norms

Engaging...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bell, A. V., Richerson, P. J., & McElreath, R. (2009). Culture rather than genes provides greater scope for the evolution of large-scale human prosociality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(42), 17671–17674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgida, E., Conner, C., & Manteufel, L. (1992). Understanding living kidney donation: A behavioral decision-making perspective. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The Claremont symposium on applied psychology. Helping and being helped: Naturalistic studies (pp. 183–211). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 773–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farrelly, D., Lazarus, J., & Roberts, G. (2007). Altruists attract. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(2), 313–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1402–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rand, D. G., Brescoll, V. L., Everett, J. A., Capraro, V., & Barcelo, H. (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4), 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tisak, M. S., & Tisak, J. (1996). My sibling’s but not my friend’s keeper: Reasoning about responses to aggressive acts. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16(3), 324–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Whatley, M. A., Webster, J. M., Smith, R. H., & Rhodes, A. (1999). The effect of a favor on public and private compliance: How internalized is the norm of reciprocity? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(3), 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jordan, J. J., Hoffman, M., Bloom, P., & Rand, D. G. (2016). Thirdparty punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness. Nature, 530(7591), 473.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Catherine Salmon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of RedlandsRedlandsUSA