Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Psychic Unity

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2798-1
  • 251 Downloads

Synonyms

Definition

The “psychic unity” idea denotes the existence of a set of psychological and cognitive capacities universally shared by human beings and grounded in biological equality.

Introduction

The psychic unity idea assumes that all humans share cognitive and linguistic capacities that are grounded in biology and that uniformly underlie how we relate to one another and to the world we live in, regardless of differential cultural upbringing. This chapter is divided into three sections. In the first section, we detail how the idea originates in ancient Greek philosophy and how throughout the ages it has spread toward the different sociocultural and linguistic disciplines. In the second part, we discuss how today, researchers in the cognitive, behavioral, and cultural sciences are providing a new biological foundation to the search for human universals. And in part three, we point toward current debates on the nature and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is financed by FCT, the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology, Grant ID DL57/2016/CP1479/CT0066 and Project ID: UIDB/00678/2020. (Este trabalho é financiado por fundos nacionais através da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., no âmbito da Norma Transitória – DL57/2016/CP1479/CT0066; UIDB/00678/2020).

References

  1. Atran, S. (1998). Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 547–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett, H. C. (2015). The shape of thought: How mental adaptations evolve. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bastian, A. (1881). Der Volkergedanke Im Aufbau Einer Wissenschaft Vom Menschen. Berlin: Verlag von Ferdinand Dümmler.Google Scholar
  4. Buller, D. (2005). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (2001). Genes, peoples, and languages. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N. (1980). On cognitive structures and their development: A reply to Piaget. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 35–52). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1997). The modular nature of human intelligence. In A. B. Scheibel & J. W. Schopf (Eds.), The origin and evolution of intelligence (pp. 71–101). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  8. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex (Vol. 1–2, 1st ed.). London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Downes, S. M. (2010). The basic components of the human mind were not solidified during the Pleistocene epoch. In F. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology (pp. 243–252). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Downes, S. M. (2018). Evolutionary psychology. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/evolutionary-psychology/. Accessed 18 Nov 2019.
  11. Duprè, J. (2001). Human nature and the limits of science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Everett, C. (2013). Linguistic relativity: Evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foley, W. A. (1997). Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Gontier, N. (2006). Introduction to evolutionary epistemology, language and culture. In N. Gontier et al. (Eds.), Evolutionary epistemology, language and culture (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gontier, N. (2009). The origin of the social approach in language and cognitive research exemplified by studies into the origin of language. In H. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp. 25–46). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  19. Greenberg, J. H. (Ed.). (1963). Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Haspelmath, M. (2012). Escaping ethnocentrism in the study of word-class universals. Theoretical Linguistics, 38(1–2), 91–102.Google Scholar
  21. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298(5598), 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hull, D. L. (1986). On human nature. PSA (Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association), 2, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingold, T. (2006). Against human nature. In N. Gontier et al. (Eds.), Evolutionary epistemology, language and culture (pp. 259–281). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jahoda, G. (2013). Theodor Waitz on psychic unity. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9255-x. Accessed 22 June 2019.
  25. Job, S. (2006). Psychic unity of humankind. Encyclopedia of Anthropology.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412952453.n458. Accessed 22 June 2019.
  26. Lewens, T. (2015). Cultural Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Machery, E. (2008). A plea for human nature. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nùñez, R. E. (2017). Is there really an evolved capacity for number? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(6), 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Odenbaugh, J. (2015). Human nature and the problem of variation” (Rough draft). http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/11552/. Accessed 02 Dec 2019.
  30. Ravenscroft, I. (2019). Folk psychology as a theory. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.). The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2019 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/folkpsych-theory/. Accessed 18 Nov 2019.
  31. Samet, J., Zaitchik, D. (2017[2012]). Innateness and contemporary theories of cognition. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2017 edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/innateness-cognition/. Accessed 21 Nov 2019.
  32. Samuels, R. (1998). Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49, 575–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sapir, E. (1929). The status of linguistics as science. Language, 5, 207–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shore, B. (2000). Human diversity and human nature. The life and times of a false dichotomy. In N. Roughley (Ed.), Being humans: Anthropological universality and particularity in transdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 81–103). Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  35. Starratt, V. G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2010). The basic components of the human mind were solidified during the Pleistocene epoch. In F. Ayala & R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology (pp. 231–242). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 5–67). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  38. Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Evolutionary Epistemology Lab, Centro de Filosofia das Ciências, Departamento de História e Filosofia das Ciências, Faculdade de CiênciasUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Pavol Prokop
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental EcologyComenius UniversityBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Institute of ZoologySlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia