Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Memory Enhanced for Cheaters Versus Non-cheaters

  • Raoul Bell
  • Axel Buchner
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2633-1



Enhanced memory for the association between a face and cheating behavior in comparison to the association between a face and trustworthy or neutral behavior


Assumptions about memory are an important component of models of reciprocal cooperation. This can be exemplified using the well-known tit-for-tat strategy, which consists of (a) cooperating on the first move in a prisoner’s dilemma game and (b) then mirroring the partner’s behavior in the next round of the game. This strategy obviously implies that people are able to remember specific instances of cooperation or defection. All models of direct reciprocity require that the previous history of interactions is remembered to some extent. Increasingly complex strategies make increasing demands on memory. Models of indirect reciprocity often imply that reputational...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Barclay, P. (2008). Enhanced recognition of defectors depends on their rarity. Cognition, 107, 817–828. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2011). Source memory for faces is determined by their emotional evaluation. Emotion, 11, 249–261. doi:10.1037/a0022597.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Musch, J. (2010). Enhanced old-new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game. Cognition, 117, 261–275. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.08.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, R., Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Giang, T., Schain, C., & Riether, N. (2012a). How specific is source memory for faces of cheaters? Evidence for categorical emotional tagging. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 457–472. doi:10.1037/a0026017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, R., Buchner, A., Kroneisen, M., & Giang, T. (2012b). On the flexibility of social source memory: A test of the emotional incongruity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1512–1529. doi:10.1037/a0028219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, R., Schain, C., & Echterhoff, G. (2014). How selfish is memory for cheaters? Evidence for moral and egoistic biases. Cognition, 132, 437–442. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchner, A., Bell, R., Mehl, B., & Musch, J. (2009). No enhanced recognition memory, but better source memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior,30, 212–224. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Graesser, A. C., & Nakamura, G. V. (1982). The impact of a schema on comprehension and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of leaning and motivation (pp. 59–109). New York: Academic. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60547-2.Google Scholar
  9. Mealey, L., Daood, C., & Krage, M. (1996). Enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 119–128. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(95)00131-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mieth, L., Bell, R., & Buchner, A. (2016). Memory and disgust: Effects of appearance-congruent and appearance-incongruent information on source memory for food. Memory, 24, 629–639. doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1034139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Heinrich Heine University DüsseldorfDüsseldorfGermany