Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Status and Reproductive Success

  • James G. ZerbeEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2571-1

Synonyms

Definition

The common statistical association between accessing greater positions of relative social rank within a group and measures of evolutionary fitness.

Introduction

Social status seems to be a key component of social organization among small-scale human societies. Status is often defined as relative access to contested resources within a social group (Henrich and Gil-White 2001). More broadly, it can be conceptualized as access to social power and influence or the ability to advance one’s aims and interests when they conflict with the goals or motives of others. The purpose of this entry is to provide a general introduction to the concept of social status and detailed results from research studies among two small-scale societies on the link between status and reproductive success, as well as citing summarizing research which provides context on the prevalence of finding this...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239(4843), 985–992.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4843.985.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hooper, P. L., Kaplan, H. S., & Boone, J. L. (2010). A theory of leadership in human cooperative groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 265(4), 633–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.05.034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Macfarlan, S. J. (2015). Warfare, marriage, and friendship in Yanomamö-land. Presented at the human evolutionary studies 4th annual symposium, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  5. Macfarlan, S. J., Walker, R. S., Flinn, M. V., & Chagnon, N. A. (2014). Lethal coalitionary aggression and long-term alliance formation among Yanomamö men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(47), 16662–16669.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418639111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. von Rueden, C. R. (2014). The roots and fruits of social status in small-scale human societies. In J. T. Cheng, J. L. Tracy, & C. Anderson (Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 179–200). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. von Rueden, C. R., & Jaeggi, A. V. (2016). Men’s status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(39), 10824–10829.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606800113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. von Rueden, C. R., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status? Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1715), 2223–2232.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Institute of Human OriginsArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Jessica Hehman
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of RedlandsRedlandsUSA