Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Intrasexual Selection

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1406-1
  • 2.4k Downloads

Synonyms

Definition

Intrasexual selection can refer to the act of competing with members of one’s own sex (for status, tangible resources, or directly for access to mates) as well as the evolutionary process that shapes the traits employed in this competition.

Introduction

In November of 2016, a striking image began making its way around the internet, two Alaskan bull moose, with their antlers locked, drowned, and frozen together at the presumptive site of their final combat – a stark illustration of the risks that animals will endure, or even pursue, in response to intrasexual selection pressures. Intrasexual selection refers to the within-sex component of the broader process of sexual selection (Darwin 1871). Whereas the other half, intersexual selection, is characterized by the choice of mates by the opposite sex, intrasexual selection refers to competition with members of the same sex. Among humans, the particular nature of the competition...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Atwood, M. (1989). Cat’s eye. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1995). Human sperm competition. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Brase, G. L., Caprar, D., & Voracek, M. (2004). Sex differences in responses to relationship threats in England and Romania. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 777–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (1998). Evolved homicide modules. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Davis, CA, July 10.Google Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., Choe, J. C., Lim, H. K., Hasegawa, M., Hasegawa, T., & Bennett, K. (1999). Jealousy and beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses in the United States, Korea, and Japan. Personal Relationships, 6, 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cerda-Flores, R. M., Barton, S. A., Marty-Gonzalez, L. F., Rivas, F., & Chakraborty, R. (1999). Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: Validation study with blood group markers. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 109, 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: A. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.Google Scholar
  11. De Backer, C. J. S., Nelissen, M., & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Let’s talk about sex: A study on the recall of gossip about potential mates and sexual rivals. Sex Roles, 56, 781–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2005). The plausibility of adaptations for homicide. In The innate mind: Structure and contents (pp. 291–304). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fay, F. H. (1982). Ecology and biology of the Pacific walrus, Odobenus rosmarus divergens Illiger. North American Fauna, 74, 1–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernandez, A. M., Sierra, J. C., Zubeidat, I., & Vera-Villarroel, P. (2006). Sex differences in response to sexual and emotional infidelity among Spanish and Chilean students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, M. (2013). Women’s intrasexual competition. In M. Fisher, J. Garcia, & R. Chang (Eds.), Evolution’s Empress: Darwinian perspectives on the nature of women (pp. 19–42). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2010). Four strategies used during intrasexual competition for mates. Personal Relationships, 18(1), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, R. A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review, 7, 184–192.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (1990). Toward an evolutionary history of female sociosexual variation. Journal of Personality, 58, 69–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., Cousins, A. J., Garver-Apgar, C. E., & Christensen, J. N. (2004). Women’s preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Garver-Apgar, C. E. (2005). Adaptations to ovulation. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Evolutionary psychology handbook (Vol. 14, p. 312). Boston: Allyn-Bacon.Google Scholar
  21. Hill, S. E., & Durante, K. M. (2011). Courtship, competition, and the pursuit of attractiveness: Mating goals facilitate health-related risk taking and strategic risk suppression in women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hyde, J. S. (1984). How large are gender differences in aggression? A developmental meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology, 20, 722–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kenrick, D. T., & Sheets, V. (1993). Homicidal fantasies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(4), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kilgallon, S. J., & Simmons, L. W. (2005). Image content influences men’s semen quality. Biology Letters, 1, 253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Markey, P., & Markey, C. (2011). Changes in women’s interpersonal styles across the menstrual cycle. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(5), 493–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKibbin, W. F., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2013). Investigating human sperm competition in post-industrial ecologies: Cues to sperm competition predict pornographic DVD sales rank. Behavioral Ecology, 24, 819–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sasse, G., Müller, H., Chakraborty, R., & Ott, J. (1994). Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland. Human Heredity, 44, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Short, R. V. (1979). Sexual selection and its component parts, somatic and genital selection, as illustrated by man and the great apes. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 9, 131–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Werner, N. E., & Crick, N. R. (1999). Relational aggression and social-psychological adjustment in a college sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whitty, M. T., & Quigley, L. (2008). Emotional and sexual infidelity offline and in cyberspace. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34(4), 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nova Southeastern UniversityFort LauderdaleUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Douglas Sellers
    • 1
  1. 1.Penn State Worthington ScrantonScrantonUSA