Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Positive and Negative Reinforcement and Punishment

  • Ioulia PapageorgiEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1048-1

Synonyms

Definition

Consequences of behavior in operant conditioning that result in strengthening (reinforcement) or weakening (punishment) the frequency of that behavior.

Introduction

During the operant conditioning process, the consequences of behavior affect the probability of future demonstrations of that behavior. Thorndike (1898, 1911) and Skinner (1938) have shown that reinforcement (also known as reward) strengthens a behavior, i.e., increases its frequency, whereas punishment weakens a behavior, i.e., decreases its frequency. Reinforcement can also be distinguished as primary/secondary and intrinsic/extrinsic.

Positive and Negative Reinforcement

Reinforcement is an environmental stimulus whose presentation results in the strengthening (increase of the frequency) of an exhibited behavior. An organism, after a number of contiguous presentations of behavior-reward, associates a specific...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akin-Little, K. A., Eckert, T. L., Lovett, B. J., & Little, S. G. (2004). Extrinsic reinforcement in the classroom: Bribery or best practice. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 344–362.Google Scholar
  2. Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64, 363–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickinson, A. M. (1989). The detrimental effects of extrinsic reinforcement on “intrinsic motivation”. The Behavior Analyst, 12, 1–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Harlow, H. F., Harlow, M. K., & Meyer, D. R. (1950). Learning motivated by a manipulative drive. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 228–234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lepper, M. R., Green, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Human learning. Boston: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  10. Powell, R. A., Honey, P. L., & Symbaluk, D. G. (2017). Introduction to learning and behavior (5th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  11. Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  12. Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 2(4), i-109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus

Section editors and affiliations

  • Menelaos Apostolou
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NicosiaNicosiaCyprus