Encyclopedia of Couple and Family Therapy

Living Edition
| Editors: Jay Lebow, Anthony Chambers, Douglas C. Breunlin

Quantitative Research in Couple and Family Therapy

  • Elizabeth Oshrin ParkerEmail author
  • Jennifer Chang
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15877-8_410-1

Name of Concept

Quantitative Research in Couple and Family Therapy

Synonyms

Introduction

The relationship between the profession and research of couple and family therapy has evolved over time. At its inception in the 1950s, couple and family therapy was considered a bold new tradition that pressed or broke many of the contemporary ideas of effective psychotherapy. Conceptualizing individual pathology through a systematic lens and including multiple people in the therapy room were revolutionary concepts that pushed the field of psychotherapy in new and exciting directions. As the field progressed, the study of couple and family therapy theories and interventions also advanced.

Theoretical Context for Concept

Research Trends. The field of couple and family therapy is considered to have five main research...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2002). Criteria for evaluating treatment guidelines. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1052–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amundson, J. K., Alladin, A., & Gill, E. (2003). Efficacy vs. effectiveness research in psychotherapy: Implications for clinical hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 46(1), 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambless, D. L., Baker, M. J., Baucom, D. H., Beutler, L. E., Calhoun, K. S., Crits-Christoph, P., Daiuto, A., DeRubeis, R., Detweiler, J., Haaga, D. A. F., Johnson, S. B., McCurry, S., Mueser, K. T., Pope, K. S., Sanderson, W. C., & Woody, S. R. (1998). Update on empirically validated therapies, II. The Clinical Psychologist, 51(1), 3–16.Google Scholar
  4. Diamond, G., & Josephson, A. (2005). Family-based treatment research: A 10-year update. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(9), 872–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hawley, D. R., Bailey, C. E., & Pennick, K. A. (2000). A content analysis of research in family therapy journals. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26, 9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00271.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. James, P. S. (1991). Effects of a communication training component added to an emotionally focused couples therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 17, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Johnson, S. M., & Greenberg, L. S. (1985). Differential effects of experiential and problem-solving interventions in resolving marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson, S. M., & Greenberg, L. (1988). Relating process to outcome in martial therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14, 175–183.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1988.tb00733.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, S. M., & Lee, A. C. (2005). Emotionally focused family therapy: Restructuring attachment. In E. C. Bailey (Ed.), Children in therapy: Using the family as a resource (pp. 112–133). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, S. M., & Talitman, E. (1997). Predictors of success in emotionally focused marital therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23, 135–152.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb00239.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson, S. M., Hunsley, J., Greenberg, L., & Schindler, D. (1999). Emotionally focused couples therapy: Status and challenges. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 67–79.  https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/6.1.67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lambert, M. J. (2013). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 169–218). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Palmer, G., & Efron, D. (2007). Emotionally focused family therapy: Developing the model. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 26, 17–24.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2007.26.4.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Palmer, G., & Johnson, S. (2002). Becoming an emotionally focused couple therapist. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 3, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Parker, E. O., Chang, J., & Thomas, V. (2016). A content analysis of quantitative research in journal of marital and family therapy: A 10 year review. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sexton, T. L., & Datchi, C. (2014). The development and evolution of family therapy research: Its impact on practice, current status, and future directions. Family Process, 53(3), 415–433.  https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12084.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sprenkle, D. H., & Piercy, F. P. (Eds.). (2005). Research methods in family therapy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Sullivan, G. M. (2011). Getting off the “gold standard”: Randomized controlled trials and education research. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 3(3), 285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wood, N. D., Crane, D. R., Schaalje, G. B., & Law, D. D. (2005). What works for whom: A meta-analytic review of marital and couples therapy in reference to marital distress. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 273–287.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01926180590962147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of IowaIowa CityUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Heather Pederson
    • 1
  • Diana Semmelhack
    • 2
  1. 1.Council for RelationshipsPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Midwestern UniversityDowners GroveUSA