General Look
Start-ups and small businesses (SU&SB) refer to entrepreneurial businesses, with a focus on the early stages that hinge on innovation and provide new, wide-ranging value to their environment, including customers, suppliers, community, investors, etc. SU&SB are deemed promising trajectories to development and growth in business terms as well as within communities, both regional and global, by introducing innovation, creating new jobs, using advanced technology, facilitating upward social mobility, and stimulating innovative strategies and technologies. These are typically carried out by small teams, with constrained resources in a highly competitive environment.
SU&SB develop in dynamic environments with changing needs, among them unmet problems and new desires. Tackling such needs and desires invigorates the search for opportunities.An opportunity is a...
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvarez SA, Young SL, Woolley JL. Opportunities and institutions: a co-creation story of the king crab industry. J Bus Ventur. 2015;30(1):95–112.
Arend RJ. Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: how firm age and size affect the ‘capability enhancement–SME performance’relationship. Small Bus Econ. 2014;42(1):33–57.
Arend RJ, Sarooghi H, Burkemper A. Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Rev. 2015;40(4):630–51.
Austin J, Stevenson H, Wei-Skillern J. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrep Theory Pract. 2006;30(1):1–22.
Baker T, Nelson RE. Creating something from nothing: resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Adm Sci Q. 2005;50(3):329–66.
Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag. 1991;17(1):99–120.
Baron RA, Mueller BA, Wolfe MT. Self-efficacy and entrepreneurs’ adoption of unattainable goals: the restraining effects of self-control. J Bus Ventur. 2016;31(1):55–71.
Boeker W, Wiltbank R. New venture evolution and managerial capabilities. Organ Sci. 2005;16(2):123–33.
Bullough A, De Luque MS, Abdelzaher D, Heim W. Developing women leaders through entrepreneurship education and training. Acad Manag Perspect. 2015;29(2):250–70.
Colombo MG, Piva E. Strengths and weaknesses of academic startups: a conceptual model. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 2008;55(1):37–49.
Deligianni I, Voudouris I, Lioukas S. Do effectuation processes shape the relationship between product diversification and performance in new ventures? Entrep Theory Pract. 2017;41(3):349–77.
Desa G, Basu S. Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strateg Entrep J. 2013;7(1):26–49.
Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manag J. 2000;21:1105–21.
Fisher G. Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: a behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrep Theory Pract. 2012;36(5): 1019–51.
Frederiksen SH. Entrepreneurship education as identity workspace. Acad Manag Proc. 2016;2016(1):12509. Academy of Management
Garcia-Castro R, Aguilera RV. Incremental value creation and appropriation in a world with multiple stakeholders. Strateg Manag J. 2015;36(1):137–47.
Granovetter M. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J Econ Perspect. 2005;19(1):33–50. Hanks, 2015
Hanks GF, Bonaparte ES. Sbdc Maximum Business Series: A Framework for Developing a Successful Innovative Entrepreneur Education Program. J Bus and Entrep. 2015;26(3):163–187.
Hashai N, Buckley PJ. Is competitive advantage a necessary condition for the emergence of the multinational enterprise? Glob Strateg J. 2014;4(1):35–48.
Huang L, Knight AP. Resources and relationships in entrepreneurship: an exchange theory of the development and effects of the entrepreneur-investor relationship. Acad Manag Rev. 2017;42(1):80–102.
Huang KF, Dyerson R, Wu LY, Harindranath G. From temporary competitive advantage to sustainable competitive advantage. Br J Manag. 2015;26(4):617–36.
Kellermanns F, Walter J, Crook TR, Kemmerer B, Narayanan V. The resource-based view in entrepreneurship: a content-analytical comparison of researchers’ and entrepreneurs’ views. J Small Bus Manag. 2016;54(1):26–48.
Keyhani M, Lévesque M, Madhok A. Toward a theory of entrepreneurial rents: a simulation of the market process. Strateg Manag J. 2015;36(1):76–96.
Kuratko DF. The emergence of entrepreneurship education: development, trends, and challenges. Entrep Theory Pract. 2005;29(5):577–98.
Lechner C, Dowling M. Firm networks: external relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrep Reg Dev. 2003;15(1): 1–26.
Lofstrom M, Bates T, Parker SC. Why are some people more likely to become small-businesses owners than others: entrepreneurship entry and industry-specific barriers. J Bus Ventur. 2014;29(2):232–51.
Mankevich V, Holmström J. Gateways to digital entrepreneurship: investigating the organizing logics for digital startups. Acad Manag Proc. 2016;2016(1):13995. Academy of Management
Matlay H. Researching entrepreneurship and education: Part 2: what is entrepreneurship education and does it matter? Educ Train. 2006;48(8/9):704–18.
McMullen JS, Kier AS. Trapped by the entrepreneurial mindset: opportunity seeking and escalation of commitment in the Mount Everest disaster. J Bus Ventur. 2016;31(6):663–86.
Miller D, Le Breton-Miller I. Underdog entrepreneurship: A model of challenge-based entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 2017;41(1):7–17.
Nabi G, Liñán F, Fayolle A, Krueger N, Walmsley A. The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: a systematic review and research agenda. Acad Manag Learn Educ. 2016; https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026.
Nambisan S, Baron RA. Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: entrepreneurs’ self-regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrep Theory Pract. 2013;37(5):1071–97.
Partanen J, Chetty SK, Rajala A. Innovation types and network relationships. Entrep Theory Pract. 2014;38(5):1027–55.
Perry JT, Chandler GN, Markova G. Entrepreneurial effectuation: a review and suggestions for future research. Entrep Theory Pract. 2012;36(4):837–61.
Peteraf M, Di Stefano G, Verona G. The elephant in the room of dynamic capabilities: bringing two diverging conversations together. Strateg Manag J. 2013;34(12): 1389–410.
Politis D. The process of entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework. Entrep Theory Pract. 2005;29(4): 399–424.
Ray G, Barney JB, Muhanna WA. Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strateg Manag J. 2004;25(1):23–37.
Sarasvathy SD. Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manag Rev. 2001;26(2): 243–63.
Sarasvathy S, Kumar K, York JG, Bhagavatula S. An effectual approach to international entrepreneurship: overlaps, challenges, and provocative possibilities. Entrep Theory Pract. 2014;38(1):71–93.
Sarooghi H, Libaers D, Burkemper A. Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: a meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. J Bus Ventur. 2015;30(5):714–31.
Shaikh F. The benefits of new online (digital) technologies on business: understanding the impact of digital. Digit Entrep Global Innov. 2016;1:1–17
Shane S, Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manag Rev. 2000;25(1):217–26.
Shepherd DA. Learning from business failure: propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Acad Manag Rev. 2003;28(2):318–28.
Stinchfield BT, Nelson RE, Wood MS. Learning from Levi-Strauss’ legacy: art, craft, engineering, bricolage, and brokerage in entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract. 2013;37(4):889–921.
Suddaby R, Bruton GD, Si SX. Entrepreneurship through a qualitative lens: insights on the construction and/or discovery of entrepreneurial opportunity. J Bus Ventur. 2015;30(1):1–10.
Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J. 1997;18: 509–33.
Townsend DM, Busenitz LW. Turning water into wine? Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in early-stage capitalization processes. J Bus Ventur. 2015;30(2):292–306.
Ucbasaran D, Westhead P, Wright M, Flores M. The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism. J Bus Ventur. 2010;25(6): 541–55.
Welter C, Mauer R, Wuebker RJ. Bridging behavioral models and theoretical concepts: effectuation and bricolage in the opportunity creation framework. Strateg Entrep J. 2016;10(1):5–20.
Wincent J, Thorgren S, Anokhin S. Costly ties: social capital as a retardant of network-level entrepreneurial orientation. J Small Bus Manag. 2016;54(1):229–43.
Witt P. Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups. Entrep Reg Dev. 2004;16(5):391–412.
Zahra SA. Entrepreneurship and disciplinary scholarship: return to the fountainhead. In: Handbook of entrepreneurship research. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 253–68.
Zahra SA, Gedajlovic E, Neubaum DO, Shulman JM. A typology of social entrepreneurs: motives, search processes and ethical challenges. J Bus Ventur. 2009;24(5):519–32.
Zhang SX, Cueto J. The study of bias in entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract. 2017;41(3):419–54.
Zollo M, Winter SG. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ Sci. 2002;13(3): 339–51.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kariv, D. (2020). Start-Up and Small Business Life. In: Carayannis, E.G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_466
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_466
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15346-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15347-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences