Advertisement

Assessing Pediatric Foot Deformities by Pedobarography

  • Dieter Rosenbaum
Reference work entry

Abstract

The majority of children’s feet are considered as normal at birth but still may develop certain characteristics where a distinction between normal shape and foot deformity appears necessary, not only for addressing parents’ concerns for their child’s health and well-being but also to decide whether an intervention – be it conservative or surgical – is warranted. Therefore the natural development of children’s feet should be monitored not only with visual and/or radiographical assessment but preferably also with functional assessment. There are several methods to assess foot function under dynamic loading conditions, one regularly applied method being pedobarography, i.e., the measurement of the plantar pressure distribution during gait.

This method can be and has been used from infancy all the way to adolescence as it provides a detailed description and analysis of the local load distribution under the plantar aspect of the foot. The spatial resolution of the sensor area should be sufficient to identify the main loading areas even in the smaller feet of children, and the temporal resolution should be fast enough to provide sufficient detail for the various phases of the ground contact in dynamic loading situations. With a range of parameters, the local loading characteristics can be described for various regions of the foot. This allows for a detailed assessment of the individual’s foot loading characteristics and for comparisons across the life-span.

The present contribution aims to provide insights into the application of pedobarography as an assessment tool for normal children’s feet as well as for pediatric foot deformities such as clubfeet, idiopathic flatfeet, and CMT feet, supported by demonstrations with appropriate examples.

Keywords

Children’s feet Foot deformities Pediatric orthopedics Foot loading Plantar pressure measurements Pedobarography Clubfoot Flatfoot Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 

References

  1. Aharonson Z, Voloshin A, Steinbach TV et al (1980) Normal foot-ground pressure patterns in children. Clin Orthop 150:220–223Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez C, De Vera M, Chhina H et al (2008) Normative data for the dynamic pedobarographic profiles of children. Gait Posture 28:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beely F (1882) Zur Mechanik des Stehens. Langenbecks Arch Chir 27:457–471Google Scholar
  4. Bernius P (2010) Sensomotoric shoe inserts – what’s new, what’s known? Fuß Sprunggelenk 8:16–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertsch C, Rosenbaum D, Winkelmann W (2003) Evaluation of early walking patterns by plantar pressure distribution. Clin Biomech 18:S3–S4Google Scholar
  6. Bertsch C, Unger H, Winkelmann W et al (2004) Evaluation of early walking patterns from plantar pressure distribution measurements. First year results of 42 children. Gait Posture 19:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosch K, Gerss J, Rosenbaum D (2007) Preliminary normative values for foot loading parameters of the developing child. Gait Posture 26:238–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosch K, Gerss J, Rosenbaum D (2010) Development of healthy children’s feet – nine-year results of a longitudinal investigation of plantar loading patterns. Gait Posture 32:564–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlet G (1872) Sur la locomotion humaine. Ann Sci Nat 5:1–92Google Scholar
  10. Chan G, Sampath J, Miller F et al (2007) The role of the dynamic pedobarograph in assessing treatment of cavovarus feet in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Pediatr Orthop 27:510–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Church C, Coplan JA, Poljak D et al (2012) A comprehensive outcome comparison of surgical and Ponseti clubfoot treatments with reference to pediatric norms. J Child Orthop 6:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper DM, Dietz FR (1995) Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1477–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cousins SD, Morrison SC, Drechsler WI (2012) The reliability of plantar pressure assessment during barefoot level walking in children aged 7–11 years. J Foot Ankle Res 5:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cousins SD, Morrison SC, Drechsler WI (2013) Foot loading patterns in normal weight, overweight and obese children aged 7 to 11 years. J Foot Ankle Res 6:36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis BL, Cothren RM, Quesada P et al (1996) Frequency content of normal and diabetic plantar pressure profiles: implications for the selection of transducer sizes. J Biomech 29:979–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dhanendran M, Hutton WC, Klenerman L et al (1980) Foot function in juvenile chronic arthritis. Rheumatol Rehabil 19:20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dobbs MB, Corley CL, Morcuende JA, Ponseti IV. Late recurrence of clubfoot deformity: a 45-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(411):188–92Google Scholar
  18. Evans AM, Rome K (2011) A Cochrane review of the evidence for non-surgical interventions for flexible pediatric flat feet. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 47:69–89Google Scholar
  19. Fairburn PS, Panagamuwa B, Falkonakis A et al (2002) The use of multidisciplinary assessment and scientific measurement in advanced juvenile idiopathic arthritis can categorise gait deviations to guide treatment. Arch Dis Child 87:160–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Favre P, Exner GU, Drerup B et al (2007) The contralateral foot in children with unilateral clubfoot: a study of pressures and forces involved in gait. J Pediatr Orthop 27:54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forriol F, Pascual J (1990) Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years of age. Foot Ankle 11:101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gurney JK, Marshall PWM, Rosenbaum D, Kersting UG (2013) Test–retest reliability of dynamic plantar loading and foot geometry measures in diabetics with peripheral neuropathy. Gait posture 37(1):135–137Google Scholar
  23. Hallemans A, D’aout K, De Clercq D et al (2003) Pressure distribution patterns under the feet of new walkers: the first two month of independent walking. Foot Ankle Int 24:444–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hallemans A, De Clercq D, Dongen SV et al (2006) Changes in foot-function parameters during the first 5 months after the onset of independent walking: a longitudinal follow-up study. Gait Posture 23:142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamel J (2010) Die calcaneostop-arthrorise–eine retrospektive klinische Studie mit Komplikations-Analyse. Fuß Sprunggelenk 8(1):35–41Google Scholar
  26. Hennig EM, Rosenbaum D (1991) Pressure distribution patterns under the feet of children in comparison with adults. Foot Ankle 11:306–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hennig EM, Staats A, Rosenbaum D (1994) Plantar pressure distribution patterns of young school children in comparison to adults. Foot Ankle Int 15:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hughes J (1993) The clinical use of pedobarography. Acta Orthop Belg 59:10–16Google Scholar
  29. Hughes J, Clark P, Jagoe JR et al (1991) The pattern of pressure distribution under the weightbearing forefoot. Foot 1:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeans KA, Karol LA (2010) Plantar pressures following Ponseti and French physiotherapy methods for clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 30:82–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Katoh Y, Chao EYS, Laughman RK et al (1983) Biomechanical analysis of foot function during gait and clinical applications. Clin Orthop 177:23–33Google Scholar
  32. Kellermann P, Roth S, Gion K et al (2011) Calcaneo-stop procedure for paediatric flexible flatfoot. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1363–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lampe R, Mitternacht J, von Pfister L, Turova V, Blumenstein T, Alves-Pinto A (2016) Development of congenital clubfoot during growth: a long-term study on the basis of pedobarography, biomechanics, and magnetic resonance imaging measurements of muscle volumes. J Pediatr Orthop B [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  34. Lykissas MG, Crawford AH, Eismann EA et al (2013) Ponseti method compared with soft-tissue release for the management of clubfoot: a meta-analysis study. World J Orthop 4:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marey M (1873) De la locomotion terrestre chez les bipedes et les quadrupedes. J Anat Physiol 9:42Google Scholar
  36. Merker J, Hartmann M, Kreuzpointner F et al (2015) Pathophysiology of juvenile idiopathic arthritis induced pes planovalgus in static and walking condition: a functional view using 3D gait analysis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 13:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muller S, Carlsohn A, Muller J et al (2012) Static and dynamic foot characteristics in children aged 1–13 years: a cross-sectional study. Gait Posture 35:389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Onodera AN, Sacco IC, Morioka EH et al (2008) What is the best method for child longitudinal plantar arch assessment and when does arch maturation occur? Foot (Edinb) 18:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Orlin MN, Pierrynowski MR, Robertson W (1990) Normative static foot pressure distribution patterns in children. In: 6th annual east coast clinical gait conference, East Lansing, pp 123–125Google Scholar
  40. Phethean J, Nester C (2012) The influence of body weight, body mass index and gender on plantar pressures: results of a cross-sectional study of healthy children’s feet. Gait Posture 36:287–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Phethean J, Pataky TC, Nester CJ et al (2014) A cross-sectional study of age-related changes in plantar pressure distribution between 4 and 7 years: a comparison of regional and pixel-level analyses. Gait Posture 39:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Putti AB, Arnold GP, Cochrane LA et al (2008) Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed ST4 system. Gait Posture 27:501–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Riad J, Coleman S, Henley J et al (2007) Reliability of pediobarographs for paediatric foot deformity. J Child Orthop 1:307–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richter M, Zech S (2013) Arthrorisis with calcaneostop screw in children corrects Talo-1st Metatarsal-Index (TMT-Index). Foot Ankle Surg 19:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Riddiford-Harland DL, Steele JR, Cliff DP et al (2015) Lower activity levels are related to higher plantar pressures in overweight children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 47:357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Riddiford-Harland DL, Steele JR, Cliff DP et al (2016) Does participation in a physical activity program impact upon the feet of overweight and obese children? J Sci Med Sport 19:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rosenbaum D, Lorei T (2003) Influence of density of pressure sensors on parameters of plantar foot load – a pedographic comparison of two pressure distribution recording platforms. Biomed Tech (Berl) 48:166–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwartz RP, Heath AL (1932) The pneumographic method of recording gait. J Bone Joint Surg 4:783–794Google Scholar
  49. Sinclair MF, Bosch K, Rosenbaum D et al (2009) Pedobarographic analysis following Ponseti treatment for congenital clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1223–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M (1987) The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:426–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tong JW, Kong PW (2013) Reliability of footprint geometric and plantar loading measurements in children using the Emed((R)) M system. Gait Posture 38:281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tsaknakis K, Hell AK (2013) Fußdeformitäten im Kindesalter. Kinderarztl Prax 84:35–40Google Scholar
  53. Van Der Leeden M, Dekker JH, Siemonsma PC et al (2004) Reproducibility of plantar pressure measurements in patients with chronic arthritis: a comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step protocols and an estimate of the number of measurements required. Foot Ankle Int 25:739–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Velasco R (2012) Fußdeformitäten im Kindesalter. Pädiatrie 9(17):2Google Scholar
  55. Westberry DE, Davids JR, Anderson JP et al (2013) The operative correction of symptomatic flat foot deformities in children: the relationship between static alignment and dynamic loading. Bone Joint J 95-B:706–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yan SH, Zhang K, Tan GQ et al (2013) Effects of obesity on dynamic plantar pressure distribution in Chinese prepubescent children during walking. Gait Posture 37:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhao D, Li H, Zhao L et al (2014) Results of clubfoot management using the Ponseti method: do the details matter? A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:1329–1336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Funktionsbereich Bewegungsanalytik, Institut für Experimentelle Muskuloskelettale Medizin, Zentrum für Muskuloskelettale MedizinUniversitätsklinikum MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations