Hill-Based Muscle Modeling

Reference work entry

Abstract

The Hill muscle model consists mainly of a contractile component (CC) in series with an elastic component (SEC) and is used widely in biomechanics and human movement science to actuate musculoskeletal models in simulations of human movement. This chapter summarizes the main features of Hill-based muscle models, including detailed treatments of the SEC force-extension relationship and the CC activation dynamics, force-length relationship, and force-velocity relationship. Additional model elements including CC pennation, parallel elasticity, history dependence, and metabolic energy expenditure are covered in brief. A contemporary summary of parameter values needed to implement muscle-specific models when creating models of the lower limb is included.

Keywords

Contractile component Series elastic component Activation Force length Force velocity Parameters 

References

  1. Abbott BC, Aubert XM (1952) The force exerted by active striated muscle during and after change of length. J Physiol 117:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander RM, Vernon A (1975) The dimensions of knee and ankle muscles and the forces they exert. J Hum Mov Stud 1:115–123Google Scholar
  3. An KN, Takahashi K, Harrigan TP, Chao EY (1984) Determination of muscle orientations and moment arms. J Biomech Eng 106:280–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson DE, Madigan ML, Nussbaum MA (2007) Maximum voluntary joint torque as a function of joint angle and angular velocity: model development and application to the lower limb. J Biomech 40:3105–3113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahler AS (1968) Modeling of mammalian skeletal muscle. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 15:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergmann G, Bender A, Graichen F, Dymke J, Rohlmann A, Trepczynski A, Heller MO, Kutzner I (2014) Standardized loads acting in knee implants. PLoS One 9:e86035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertram JEA (2005) Constrained optimization in human walking: cost minimization and gait plasticity. J Exp Biol 208:979–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchanan TS, Lloyd DG, Manal K, Besier TF (2004) Neuromusculoskeletal modeling: estimation of muscle forces and joint moments from measurements of neural command. J Appl Biomech 20:367–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caldwell GE (1995) Tendon elasticity and relative length: effects on the Hill two-component muscle model. J Appl Biomech 11:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chow JW, Darling WG (1999) The maximum shortening velocity of muscle should be scaled with activation. J Appl Physiol 86:1025–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clarkson PM, Kroll W, McBride TC (1980) Maximal isometric strength and fiber type composition in power and endurance athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol 44:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole GK, van den Bogert AJ, Herzog W, Gerritsen KGM (1996) Modelling of force production in skeletal muscle undergoing stretch. J Biomech 29:1091–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delp SL, Loan JP, Hoy MG, Zajac FE, Topp EL, Rosen JM (1990) An interactive graphics-based model of the lower extremity to study orthopaedic surgical procedures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 37:757–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dick TJ, Biewener AA, Wakeling JM (2017) Comparison of human gastrocnemius forces predicted by Hill-type muscle models and estimated from ultrasound images. J Exp Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.154807
  15. Edwards WB, Taylor D, Rudolphi TJ, Gillette JC, Derrick TR (2009) Effects of stride length and running mileage on a probabilistic stress fracture model. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:2177–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forcinito M, Epstein M, Herzog W (1998) Can a rheological muscle model predict force depression/enhancement? J Biomech 31:1093–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fuglevand AJ, Winder DA, Patla AE (1993) Models of recruitment and rate coding organization in motor-unit pools. J Neurophysiol 70:2470–2488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordon AM, Huxley AL, Julian FJ (1966) The variation in isometric tension with sarcomere length in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 184:170–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Günther M, Schmitt S, Wank V (2007) High-frequency oscillations as a consequence of neglected serial damping in Hill-type muscle models. Biol Cybern 97:63–79CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Hasson CJ, Caldwell GE (2012) Effects of age on mechanical properties of dorsiflexor and plantarflexor muscles. Ann Biomed Eng 40:1088–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatze H (1976) The complete optimization of a human motion. Math Biosci 28:99–135MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Hatze H (1977) A myocybernetic control model of skeletal muscle. Biol Cybern 25:103–119CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Hatze H (1981) Estimation of myodynamic parameter values from observations on isometrically contracting muscle groups. Eur J Appl Physiol 46:325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. He JP, Levine WS, Loeb GE (1991) Feedback gains for correcting small perturbations to standing posture. IEEE Trans Autom Control 36:322–332CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Herzog W (2004) History dependence of skeletal muscle force production: implications for movement control. Hum Mov Sci 23:591–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herzog W, Powers K, Johnston K, Duvall M (2015) A new paradigm for muscle contraction. Front Physiol 6:174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hicks JL, Uchida TK, Seth A, Rajagopal A, Delp SL (2015) Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement. J Biomech Eng 137:020905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hill AV (1938) The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 126:136–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill AV (1950) The series elastic component of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 137:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill TL (1974) Theoretical formalism for the sliding filament model of contraction of striated muscle: part I. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 28:267–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huijing PA (1996) Important experimental factors for skeletal muscle modelling: non-linear changes of muscle length force characteristics as a function of degree of activity. Eur J Morphol 34:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huxley AF (1957) Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem 7:255–318Google Scholar
  33. Katz B (1939) The relation between force and speed in muscular contraction. J Physiol 96:45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee SSM, Arnold AS, de Boef MM, Biewener AA, Wakeling JM (2013) Accuracy of gastrocnemius muscles forces in walking and running goats predicted by one-element and two-element Hill-type models. J Biomech 46:2288–2295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lichtwark GA, Wilson AM (2007) Is Achilles tendon compliance optimised for maximum muscle efficiency in locomotion? J Biomech 40:1768–1775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lieber RL, Loren GJ, Fridén J (1994) In vivo measurement of human wrist extensor muscle sarcomere length changes. J Neurophysiol 71:874–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lloyd DG, Besier TF (2003) An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. J Biomech 36:765–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maganaris CN, Baltzopoulos V, Sargeant AJ (1998) Changes in Achilles tendon moment arm from rest to maximum isometric plantarflexion: in vivo observations in man. J Physiol 510:977–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McGowan CP, Neptune RR, Herzog W (2013) A phenomenological muscle model to assess history dependent effects in human movement. J Biomech 46:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McLean SG, Su A, van den Bogert AJ (2003) Development and validation of a 3-D model to predict knee joint loading during dynamic movement. J Biomech Eng 125:864–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller RH (2014) A comparison of muscle energy models for simulating human walking in three dimensions. J Biomech 47:1373–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller RH (2016) Summary of muscle parameters for Hill-based muscle modeling in the human lower limb. bioRxiv:090944.  https://doi.org/10.1101/0909044
  43. Minetti AE, Alexander RM (1997) A theory of metabolic costs for bipedal gaits. J Theor Biol 186:467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neptune RR, Kautz SA, Zajac FE (2001) Contributions of the individual ankle plantar flexors to support, forward progression and swing initiation during walking. J Biomech 34:1387–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pandy MG (1999) Moment arm of a muscle force. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 27:79–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parkkola R, Alanen A, Kalimo H, Lillsunde I, Komu M, Kormano M (1993) MR relaxation times and fiber type predominance of the psoas and multifidus muscle: an autopsy study. Acta Radiol 34:16–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Riener R, Edrich T (1999) Identification of passive elastic joint moments in the lower extremities. J Biomech 32:539–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sacks RS, Roy RR (1982) Architecture of the hindlimb muscles of the cat: functional significance. J Morphol 173:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scott SH, Engstrom CM, Loeb GE (1993) Morphometry of human thigh muscles: determination of fascicle architecture by magnetic resonance imaging. J Anat 182:249–257Google Scholar
  50. Scott W, Stevens J, Binder-Macleod SA (2001) Human skeletal muscle fiber type classifications. Phys Ther 81:1810–1816Google Scholar
  51. Scovil CY, Ronsky JL (2006) Sensitivity of a Hill-based muscle model to perturbations in model parameters. J Biomech 39:2055–2063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siebert T, Rode C, Herzog W, Till O, Blickhan R (2008) Nonlinearities make a difference: comparison of two common Hill-type models with real muscle. Biol Cybern 98:133–143MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. Srinivasan M (2009) Optimal speeds for walking and running, and walking on a moving walkway. Chaos 19:026112MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Trotter JA (1990) Interfiber tension transmission in series-fibered muscles of the cat hindlimb. J Morphol 206:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Umberger BR, Gerritsen KGM, Martin PE (2003) A model of human muscle energy expenditure. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 6:99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van den Bogert AJ, Blana D, Heinrich D (2011) Implicit methods for efficient musculoskeletal simulation and optimal control. Procedia IUTAM 2:297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Van den Bogert AJ, Gerritsen KGM, Cole GK (1998) Human muscle modelling from a user’s perspective. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 8:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Soest AJ, Bobbert MF (1993) The contribution of muscle properties in the control of explosive movements. Biol Cybern 69:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Walker SM, Schroedt GR (1974) I segment lengths and thin filament periods in skeletal muscle fibers of the rhesus monkey and the human. Anat Rec 178:63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Winters JM, Stark L (1985) Analysis of fundamental human movement patterns through the use of in-depth antagonistic muscle models. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 32:826–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Woittiez RD, Huijing PA, Rozendal RH (1983) Influence of muscle architecture on the length-force diagram of mammalian muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 399:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zahalak GI (1981) A distribution-moment approximation for kinetic theories of muscular contraction. Math Biosci 55:89–114CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. Zajac FE, Gordon ME (1989) Determining muscle’s force and action in multi-articular movement. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 17:187–230Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of KinesiologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • William Scott Selbie
    • 1
  1. 1.Has-Motion Inc.KingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations