Until the early 1990s, the tools available to measure musculoskeletal motion were typically highly invasive. Thus, knowledge of musculoskeletal system dynamics was primarily derived through cadaver and modeling experiments. The rapid development of dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging techniques changed this and opened vast new opportunities for the study of 3D musculoskeletal dynamics during volitional activities. Today, dynamic MR methodologies remain the only techniques that can noninvasively track in vivo 3D musculoskeletal movement.
One difficulty in applying these dynamic MR techniques to the study of musculoskeletal motion is the complex interplay of parameters that affect the spatial/temporal resolution, accuracy, and precision. The purpose of this chapter is to first provide an explanation of the fundamental principles behind two of these dynamic imaging techniques, cine and cine phase-contrast MR. Tagged cine MR is another technique that has been primarily used to track muscle motion and strain but will not be addressed. In doing so, this will create a platform for future experimental designs using dynamic MR. This will be followed by a review of the accuracies, the advantages, and disadvantages of the these dynamic MR methods. Finally, several previously published studies will be highlighted to provide an explanation of how these techniques can be applied and what main challenges must be considered for future experiments using dynamic MR.
MR Magnetic resonance imaging Cine Cine phase contrast Fastcard CPC Fast-PC Musculoskeletal Kinematics Strain Moment arms Tendon
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
This work was funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. This research was also made possible through the NIH Medical Research Scholars Program, a public-private partnership (http://fnih.org). We thank Judith Welsh for her help and support in the work.
Asakawa DS, Blemker SS, Gold GE, Delp SL (2002) In vivo motion of the rectus femoris muscle after tendon transfer surgery. J Biomech 35(8):1029–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fregly BJ, Rahman HA, Banks SA (2005) Theoretical accuracy of model-based shape matching for measuring natural knee kinematics with single-plane fluoroscopy. J Biomech Eng 127(4):692–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara T, Togashi K, Yamaoka T, Nakai A, Kido A, Nishio S, Yamamoto T, Kitagaki H, Fujii S (2004) Kinematics of the uterus: cine mode MR imaging. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 24(1):e19. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.e19Google Scholar
Glover GH, Pelc NJ (1988) A rapid-gated cine MRI technique. In: Magnetic resonance annual. Raven Press, New York, NY, pp 299–333Google Scholar
Keegan J, Firmin D, Gatehouse P, Longmore D (1994) The application of breath hold phase velocity mapping techniques to the measurement of coronary artery blood flow velocity: phantom data and initial in vivo results. Magn Reson Med 31(5):526–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinugasa R, Shin D, Yamauchi J, Mishra C, Hodgson JA, Edgerton VR, Sinha S (2008) Phase-contrast MRI reveals mechanical behavior of superficial and deep aponeuroses in human medial gastrocnemius during isometric contraction. J Appl Physiol (Bethesda, MD: 1985) 105(4):1312–1320. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.90440.2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manal K, McClay I, Stanhope S, Richards J, Galinat B (2000) Comparison of surface mounted markers and attachment methods in estimating tibial rotations during walking: an in vivo study. Gait Posture 11(1):38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moro-oka TA, Hamai S, Miura H, Shimoto T, Higaki H, Fregly BJ, Iwamoto Y, Banks SA (2007) Can magnetic resonance imaging-derived bone models be used for accurate motion measurement with single-plane three-dimensional shape registration? J Orthop Res 25(7):867–872. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riederer SJ (1993) Spatial encoding and image reconstruction. In: Bronskill MJ, Sprawls P (eds) The physics of MRI: 1992 AAP< summer school proceedings. American Instiutes of Physics, Woodbury, pp 135–165Google Scholar
Shibanuma N, Sheehan FT, Stanhope SJ (2005) Limb positioning is critical for defining patellofemoral alignment and femoral shape. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:198–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih YF, Bull AM, McGregor AH, Humphries K, Amis AA (2003) A technique for the measurement of patellar tracking during weight-bearing activities using ultrasound. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med 217(6):449–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha S, Shin DD, Hodgson JA, Kinugasa R, Edgerton VR (2012) Computer-controlled, MR-compatible foot-pedal device to study dynamics of the muscle tendon complex under isometric, concentric, and eccentric contractions. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI 36(2):498–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.23617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone M, Davis EP, Douglas AS, NessAiver M, Gullapalli R, Levine WS, Lundberg A (2001) Modeling the motion of the internal tongue from tagged cine-MRI images. J Acoust Soc Am 109(6):2974–2982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen H, Dou Z, Finni T, Havu M, Kang Z, Cheng S, Sipila S, Sinha S, Usenius JP, Cheng S (2008) Thigh muscle function in stroke patients revealed by velocity-encoded cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Muscle Nerve 37(6):736–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.20986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood M, Wiang Q (1993) Motion artifacts and remedies. In: Bronskill MJ, Sprawls P (eds) The physics of MRI: 1992 AAP< summer school proceedings. American Instiutes of Physics, Woodbury, pp 383–411Google Scholar
Yamashita S, Isoda H, Hirano M, Takeda H, Inagawa S, Takehara Y, Alley MT, Markl M, Pelc NJ, Sakahara H (2007) Visualization of hemodynamics in intracranial arteries using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging: JMRI 25(3):473–478. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20828CrossRefGoogle Scholar