Geoengineering for Climate Stabilization

  • Maximilian Lackner
Reference work entry


Engineering the climate by means of carbon dioxide removal (CDR), Earth radiation management (ERM), and/or solar radiation management (SRM) approaches has recaptured the attention of scientists, policy makers, and the public. Climate engineering is being assessed as a set of tools to deliberately, and on a large scale, moderate or retard global warming. There are several concepts available, like injecting aerosol-forming SO2 into the stratosphere or placing huge objects in orbit to partly shade Earth from incoming radiation or fertilizing the ocean with iron for increased algae growth and creation of carbon sinks. Such concepts are highly speculative, and irrespective of whether they would work, they bear huge risks, from adversely affecting the complex climate system on a regional or global scale to potentially triggering droughts, famine, or wars. More research is needed to better understand promising concepts and to work them out in depth, so that options are made available in case they should become necessary in the future, when climate change mitigation and adaptation measures do not suffice and fast action becomes imperative. Apart from the technological hurdles, which are anyhow mostly far beyond today’s engineering capabilities, huge social, moral, and political issues would have to be overcome. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight a few common concepts of CDR, ERM, and SRM for climate engineering to mitigate climate change.


Climate engineering Geoengineering Solar radiation management (SRM) Carbon dioxide removal (CRD) Earth radiation management (ERM) Meteorological reactor Stratospheric aerosols Ocean fertilization Biochar Dyson dots Enhanced weathering 


  1. Aaltonen H, Pumpanen J, Pihlatie M, Hakola H, Hellén H, Kulmala L, Vesala T, Bäck J (2011) Boreal pine forest floor biogenic volatile organic compound emissions peak in early summer and autumn. Agr Forest Meteorol 151(6):682–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anshelm J, Hansson A (2014) Battling Promethean dreams and Trojan horses: revealing the critical discourses of geoengineering. Energy Res Soc Sci 2:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barreras F, Amaveda H, Lozano A (2002) Transient high frequency ultrasonic water atomization. Exp Fluids 33:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE, Lenton TM (2012) Appraising geoengineering. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, working paper 153, June 2012Google Scholar
  5. Bewick R, Sanchez JP, McInnes CR (2012) The feasibility of using an L1 positioned dust cloud as a method of space-based geoengineering. Adv Space Res 49(7):1212–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bewick R, Lücking C, Colombo C, Sanchez JP, McInnes CR (2013) Heliotropic dust rings for Earth climate engineering. Adv Space Res 51(7):1132–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blue Carbon Initiative (2015)
  8. Bonn A, Reed MS, Evans CD, Joosten H, Bain C, Farmer J, Emmer I, Couwenberg J, Moxey A, Artz R, Tanneberger F, von Unger M, Smyth M-A, Birnie D (2014) Investing in nature: developing ecosystem service markets for peatland restoration. Ecosyst Serv 9:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boston PJ (2008) Gaia hypothesis. In: Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences, from encyclopedia of ecology. Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 1727–1731Google Scholar
  10. Butler JH, Montzka SA (2013) The NOAA annual greenhouse gas index (AGGI). NOAA/ESRL Global Monitoring Division. (2015)
  11. Burke J (2010) Could a massive dam between Alaska and Russia save the Arctic? Huffington Post. 27 Nov 2010. Retrieved 10 Mar 2011Google Scholar
  12. Byrnes SJ, Blanchard R, Capasso F (2014) Harvesting renewable energy from Earth’s mid-infrared emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(11):3927–3932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chossudovsky M (2007, Dec 7) Weather warfare: beware the US Military’s experiments with climatic warfare. The Ecologist, Global Research.
  14. Climate Modification Schemes, American Institute of Physics (AIP) (2011)
  15. Cole JJ (2013) Chapter 6 – The carbon cycle: with a brief introduction to global biogeochemistry. In: Fundamentals of ecosystem science. pp 109–135Google Scholar
  16. Collyns D (2010) Can painting a mountain restore a glacier? BBC.
  17. Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon N, Vaughan NE (2013) Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Glob Environ Change 23(5):938–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim Change 77:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de_Richter RK, Ming T, Caillol S (2013) Fighting global warming by photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using giant photocatalytic reactors. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 19:82–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dean C (2011) Group urges research into aggressive efforts to fight climate change.
  21. Dixon T, Garrett J, Kleverlaan E (2014) GHGT-12, update on the London protocol – developments on transboundary CCS and on geoengineering. Energy Procedia 63:6623–6628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DOE/NETL carbon dioxide capture and storage RD&D roadmap, Dec 2010.
  23. Early JT (1989) Space-based solar shield to offset greenhouse effect. J Br Interplanet Soc 42:567–569.
  24. Ebersbach F, Assmy P, Martin P, Schulz I, Wolzenburg S, Nöthig E-M (2014) Particle flux characterisation and sedimentation patterns of protist plankton during the iron fertilisation experiment LOHAFEX in the Southern Ocean. Deep Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap 89:94–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Field C, Barros V, Stocker TF, Dahe Q, Minx J, Mach K, Plattner G-K, Schlömer S, Hansen G, Mastrandrea M (2012) IPCC expert meeting on geoengineering, meeting report, Lima, 20–22 June 2011, ISBN 978-92-9169-136-4Google Scholar
  26. Edmonds I, Smith G (2011) Surface reflectance and conversion efficiency dependence of technologies for mitigating global warming. Renew Energy 36:1343–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Evans J, Stride E, Edirisinghe M, Andrews D, Simons R (2010) Can oceanic foams limit global warming? Climate Res 42(2):155–160. doi:10.3354/cr00885. editCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferraro AJ, Highwood EJ, Charlton-Perez AJ (2014) Weakened tropical circulation and reduced precipitation in response to geoengineering. Environ Res Lett 9:014001 (7 pp)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goes M, Tuana N, Keller K (2010) The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering. In: Climatic change. Springer. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9961-z,
  30. Goldberg P, Chen Z-Y, O’Connor W, Walters R, Ziock H (1998) CO2 mineral sequestration studies in US.
  31. Goldenberg S (2014) Al Gore says use of geo-engineering to head off climate disaster is insane,, Wednesday 15 Jan 2014.
  32. Gomes MS de P, de Araújo MSM (2011) Artificial cooling of the atmosphere – a discussion on the environmental effects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(1):780–786Google Scholar
  33. Herzog H (2002) Carbon sequestration via mineral carbonation: overview and assessment (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 5 Mar 2009Google Scholar
  34. Heyward C, Rayner S (2013) A curious asymmetry: social science expertise and geoengineering. Climate geoengineering governance working paper series: 007.
  35. House KZ et al (2011) An economic and energetic analysis of capturing CO2 from ambient air. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:20428–20433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hyland C, Sarmah AK (2014) Chapter 25 – Advances and innovations in biochar production and utilization for improving environmental quality. In: Bioenergy research: advances and applications. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 435–446Google Scholar
  37. IPCC (2015) 2.2.3. Afforestation, reforestation, and deforestation.
  38. Keith DW, Parson E, Morgan MG (2010) Research on global sun block needed now. Nature (Nat Publ Group) 463(7280):426–427Google Scholar
  39. Kennedy RG III, Roy KI, Fields DE (2013) Dyson dots: changing the solar constant to a variable with photovoltaic lightsails. Acta Astronaut 82(2):225–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kintisch E (2010) Hack the planet: science’s best hope – or worst nightmare – for averting climate catastrophe. Wiley, Hoboken. ISBN 0-470-52426-XGoogle Scholar
  41. Kosugi T (2010) Role of sunshades in space as a climate control option. Acta Astronaut 67(1–2):241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kravitz B (2013) Geoengineering has its limits. Nature 501:9. doi:10.1038/501009aGoogle Scholar
  43. Kunzig R (2008) Geoengineering: how to cool earth – at a price. Scientific American.
  44. Lenton TM, Vaughan NE (2009) The radiative forcing potential of different climate, geoengineering options. Atmos Chem Phys 9:5539–5561.
  45. Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic non-periodic flow. J Atoms Sci 20:130–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lorenz EN (1972) Predictability: does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? American Association for the Advancement of Science, 139th meeting, 29 Dec 1972.
  47. MacMynowski DG, Keith DW, Caldeira K, Shin HJ (2011) Can we test geoengineering? Energy Environ Sci 4:5044–5052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGrath M (2014) Geoengineering plan could have ‘unintended’ side effect.
  49. Ming T, de_Richter R, Liu W, Caillol S (2014) Fighting global warming by climate engineering: is the Earth radiation management and the solar radiation management any option for fighting climate change? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:792–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mitchell DL, Finnegan W (2009) Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming. Environ Res Lett 4:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mitchell DL, Mishra S, Lawson RP (2011) Cirrus clouds and climate engineering: new findings on ice nucleation and theoretical basis. In: Planet earth. Intech, Rijeka, pp 257–288Google Scholar
  52. O’Mahony T (2013) Decomposition of Ireland’s carbon emissions from 1990 to 2010: an extended Kaya identity. Energy Policy 59:573–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oke TR (1997) Urban climates and global environmental change. In: Thompson RD, Perry A (eds) Applied climatology: principles & practices. Routledge, New York, pp 273–287Google Scholar
  54. Pacella RM (2007) Duct tape methods to save the earth: insulate the glaciers. Pop Sci.
  55. Rasch PJ, Tilmes S, Turco RP, Robock A, Oman L, Chen C, Stenchikov GL, Garcia RR (2008) An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 366(1882):4007–4037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rinnan R, Rinnan Å, Faubert P, Tiiva P, Holopainen JK, Michelsen A (2011) Few long-term effects of simulated climate change on volatile organic compound emissions and leaf chemistry of three subarctic dwarf shrubs. Environ Exp Bot 72(3):377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Robock A (2012) Is geoengineering research ethical? Peace Secur 4:226–229Google Scholar
  58. Robock A (2014) Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering. Issues Environ Sci Techol (special issue “Geoeng Clim Syst”) 38:162–185Google Scholar
  59. Robock A, Marquardt A, Kravitz B, Stenchikov G (2009) Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 36, L19703. doi:10.1029/2009GL039209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475. doi:10.1038/461472aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rusco F, Stephenson J (2010) Climate change, a coordinated strategy could focus federal geoengineering research and inform governance efforts, report to the Chairman, Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, GAO-10-903. United States Government Accountability Office (GAO).
  62. Schirmer J, Bull L (2014) Assessing the likelihood of widespread landholder adoption of afforestation and reforestation projects. Glob Environ Chang 24:306–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2012) Geoengineering in relation to the convention to biological diversity: technical and regulatory matters. CBD technical series no 66. Montreal, ISBN 92-9225-429-4.
  64. Shepherd J (2009) Geoengineering the climate: science governance and uncertainty. The Royal Society, London.
  65. Shukman D (2014) Geo-engineering: climate fixes ‘could harm billions’. Accessed 5 Jan 2015
  66. Sikka T (2012) A critical theory of technology applied to the public discussion of geoengineering. Technol Soc 34(2):109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. SPICE Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (2015)
  68. Stilgoe J, Watson M, Kuo K (2013a) Public engagement with biotechnologies offers lessons for the governance of geoengineering research and beyond. PLoS Biol 11(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001707Google Scholar
  69. Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013b) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42:1568–1580Google Scholar
  70. Stirling A (2014) Transforming power: social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:83–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stix TH (1993) Removal of chlorofluorocarbons from the troposphere, Plasma Science. IEEE conference record – abstracts, 1993 I.E. international conference on, ISBN 0-7803-1360-7Google Scholar
  72. Strand SE, Benford G (2009) Ocean sequestration of crop residue carbon: recycling fossil fuel carbon back to deep sediments. Environ Sci Technol 43(4):1000–1007. doi:10.1021/es8015556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sweeney JA (2014) Command-and-control: alternative futures of geoengineering in an age of global weirding. Futures 57:1–13MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tate KR (2015) Soil methane oxidation and land-use change – from process to mitigation. Soil Biol Biochem 80:260–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Teller E, Hyde R, Wood L (1997) Global warming and ice ages: prospects for physics-based modulation of global change (PDF). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Retrieved 30 Oct 2018. See pages 10–14 in particularGoogle Scholar
  76. Trabucco A, Zomer RJ, Bossio DA, van Straaten O, Verchot LV (2008) Climate change mitigation through afforestation/reforestation: a global analysis of hydrologic impacts with four case studies. Agr Ecosyst Environ 126(1–2):81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Victor DG, Granger Morgan M, Apt J, Steinbruner J, Ricke K (2009) The geoengineering option: a last resort against global warming?. Geoengineering. Council on Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 19 Aug 2009Google Scholar
  78. Vidal J (2011) Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment. The Guardian.
  79. von Neumann J (1955) Can we survive technology? Fortune, June, pp 106–108, 151–152. Reprinted in Sarnoff D (ed) (1956) The fabulous future: America in 1980. Dutton, New York, pp 33–48Google Scholar
  80. Weaver IS, Dyke JG (2012) The importance of timescales for the emergence of environmental self-regulation. J Theor Biol 313:172–180MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Willoughby HE, Jorgensen DP, Black RA, Rosenthal SL (1985) Project STORMFURY, a scientific chronicle, 1962–1983. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 66:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zeng N (2008) Carbon sequestration via wood burial. Carbon Balance Manage 3:1. doi:10.1186/1750-0680-3-1,
  83. Zhang Z, Moore JC, Huisingh D, Zhao Y (2015) Review of geoengineering approaches to mitigating climate change. J Clean Prod 15:898–907Google Scholar
  84. Zhou S, Flynn PC (2005) Geoengineering downwelling ocean currents: a cost assessment. Clim Change 71(1–2):203–220. doi:10.1007/s10584-005-5933-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Bossio DA, Verchot LV (2008) Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agr Ecosyst Environ 126(1–2):67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Advanced Engineering TechnologiesUniversity of Applied Sciences FH Technikum WienViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations