Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

2016 Edition
| Editors: Henk ten Have

Stem Cells: Embryonic

  • D. Gareth JonesEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_401


The advent of stem cells into the public arena in 1998 raised hopes for the treatment of a host of debilitating diseases affecting many organs and tissues of the body. The stem cells on which most attention was paid were embryonic stem cells, on account of their enormous biological potential. However, their derivation from human embryos raised major ethical qualms, involving as it does the destruction of embryos. The hype accompanying stem cells has had repercussions ranging from medical tourism to scientific fraud. The emergence in 2006 of induced pluripotent stem cells added to the clamor surrounding stem cells, since these appeared to surmount the ethical problems through bypassing an origin in embryos. These stem cells are obtained by reprogramming adult body cells so that they revert to a pluripotent state and appear to have a potential akin to that of embryonic stem cells. Embryos from which embryonic stem cells are derived may be nonviable, surplus embryos from IVF programs, embryos produced for research purposes, embryos created using somatic cell nuclear transfer, and human admixed embryos. Policy and regulatory frameworks governing the production of embryonic stem cells fall into four dominant categories, each with differing underlying ethical strictures and also with substantial scientific and clinical repercussions. The comparative status of embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells is assessed both scientifically and ethically.


Stem cells Embryonic stem cells Induced pluripotent stem cells Embryo research Moral status of the embryo 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Bridge, S. (2013). Induced pluripotent stem cells: An alternative to embryonic stem cells? Asian Bioethics Review, 5, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bush, G. W. (2006). On stem cell research. In M. Ruse & C. A. Pynes (Eds.), The stem cell controversy: Debating the issues (2nd ed.). Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  3. Cyranoski, D. (2004). Korea’s stem-cell stars dogged by suspicion of ethical breach. Nature, 429, 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cyranoski, D. (2014). Cloning comeback. Nature, 505, 468–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. European Science Foundation. (2013). Human stem cell research and regenerative medicine: Focus on European policy and scientific contributions. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. Francis, D. P., et al. (2013). Autologous bone marrow-derived stem cell therapy in heart disease: Discrepancies and contradictions. International Journal of Cardiology, 168, 3381–3401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hinxton Group: An International Consortium on Stem Cells, Ethics and Law. (2006). World stem cell policies http://www.hinxtongroup.org/wp_ao_map.html. Accessed 28 May 2014.
  8. Human Fertilisation Embryology Authority (HFEA). (2007). Hybrids and Chimeras: A report on the findings of the consultation. London: HFEA.Google Scholar
  9. Jones, D. G., & Whitaker, M. I. (2009). Speaking for the dead: The human body in biology and medicine (2nd ed.). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Jonlin, E. C. (2014). Differing standards fir the NIH stem cell registry and FDA approval render most federally funded hESC lines unsuitable for clinical use. Cell Stem Cell, 14, 139–140.Google Scholar
  11. Solbakk, J. H. (2008). The ethics of stem cell research: Can the disagreements be resolved? Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 831–832.Google Scholar
  12. Tachibana, M., et al. (2013). Human embryonic stem cells derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cell, 153, 1228–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126, 663–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Thomson, J. A., et al. (1998). Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science, 282, 1145–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Towns, C., & Jones, D. G. (2004). Stem cells, embryos and the environment: A context for both science and ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Towns, C., & Jones, D. G. (2006). Stem cells: Policy and ethics. In M. Ruse & C. A. Pynes (Eds.), The stem cell controversy: Debating the issues (2nd ed., pp. 329–341). Amherst: New York, Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Cohen, C. B. (2007). Renewing the stuff of life: Stem cells, ethics and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. President’s Council on Bioethics. (2007). Advancing stem cell science without destroying human life, Domestic Policy Council, The White House.Google Scholar
  3. Ruse, M., & Pynes, C. A. (Eds.). (2006). The stem cell controversy: Debating the issues (2nd ed.). Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand