Most foods that are consumed have not been subject to systematic toxicological and nutritional assessment but are generally regarded as safe to eat because of their long history of consumption and knowledge around preparation. This “history of safe use” of traditionally consumed foods can serve as a benchmark for comparative safety assessment of more novel foods and ingredients. It should be remembered that although traditionally consumed foods are considered safe, they may contain components such as antinutrients, toxins, and/or allergens. For example, potatoes are known to contain the glycoalkaloid solanine and the health risks of eating old or green potatoes have been understood for over a century (BMJ 1979; American Journal of Public Health 1917). Thus complete freedom from risks is an unattainable goal, safety and wholesomeness are related to a level of risk that society regards as reasonable in the context, and in comparison with other risks in everyday life (FAO 1997), and this needs to be considered when introducing new foods/ingredients.
Keywords
- Nutritional Assessment
- Comparator Material
- Antinutritional Factor
- Residual Solvent
- Complete Freedom
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.